Inheritance of species differences in female receptivity and song requirement between Drosophila virilis and D. montana

Hereditas

Volumn 131, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 203-209

  Isoherranen, Eija ^a   Aspi, Jouni ^a   Hoikkala, Anneli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; COURTSHIP; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA VIRILIS; FEMALE; INHERITANCE; MATING; NONHUMAN; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MONTANA; DROSOPHILA VIRILIS; VIRILIS GROUP;

EID: 0033497342     PISSN: 00180661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1999.t01-1-00203.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aspi J, (1992). Female mate choice and mating system among boreal Drosophila virilis group species. Acta Univ. Ouluensis A 241: 1-48.
2. Aspi J and Hoikkala A, (1995). Male mating success and survival in the field with respect to size and courtship song characters in Drosophila littoralis and D. montana (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav. 8: 67-87.
3. Bixler A, Jenkins JB, Tompkins L and McRobert SP, (1992) Identification of acoustic stimuli that mediate sexual behaviour in Drosohila busckii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav. 4: 469-478.
4. Carracedo MC, Casares P, Izquierdo JI and Pineiro R, (1991). Receptivity and sexual maturation on Drosophila melanogaster females in relation to hybridization with D. simulans males: a populational analysis. Anim. Behav. 42: 201-208.
5. Cohen J, (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (NJ).
6. Cook RM, (1973). Courtship processing in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Selection for receptivity of wingless males. Anim. Behav. 21: 338-348.
7. Cowling DE and Burnet B, (1981). Courthip songs and genetic control of their acoustic chareteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Anim. Behav. 29: 924-935.
8. Coyne JA, (1993). The genetics of an isolating mechanism between two sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 47: 778-788.
9. Coyne JA, (1996). Genetics of a difference in male cuticular hydrocarbons between two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 143: 1689-1698.
10. DeBenedictis P, (1977). Frequency-dependent choice, minority advantages, and frequency-dependent natural selection. Evolution 31: 666-673.
11. Ewing AW, (1983). Functional aspects of Drosophila courtship. Biol. Rev. 58: 275-292.
12. Falconer DS and MacKay TFC, (1989). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London.
13. Hoikkala A, (1988). The importance of different courtship stimuli in the mating behaviour of European species of the Drosophila virilis group. Ann. Zool. Fennici 25: 257-263.
14. Hoikkala A and Isoherranen E, (1997). Variation and repeatability of courtship song characters among wildcaught and laboratory-reared Drosophila montana and D. littoralis males (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav. 10: (193-202).
15. Hoikkala A and Lumme J, (1987). The genetic basis of evolution of male courtship sound in the Drosophila virilis group. Evolution 41: 827-845.
16. Hoikkala A, Aspi J and Suvanto L (1998). Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male genetic quality in an insect species, Drosophila montana. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 503-508.
17. Ikeda H, Idoji H and Takabatake I, (1981). Intraspecific variations in the thresholds of female responsiveness for auditory stimuli emitted by the male in Drosophila mercatorum. Zool. magaz. 90: 325-332.
18. Isoherranen E, Aspi J and Hoikkala A, (1999). Variation and consistency of female preferences for simulated courtship songs in Drosophila virilis. Anim. Behav 57: 619-625.
19. Izquierdo JI, Carracedo MC, Pineiro R and Casares P, (1992). Response to selection for increased hybridization between Drosophila melanogaster females and D. simulans males. J. Heredity 83: 100-104.
20. Koepfer HR, (1987). Selection for sexual isolation between geographic forms of Drosophila mojavensis. II. Effects of selection of mating preference and propensity. Evolution 41: 1409-1413.
21. Liimatainen JO and Hoikkala A, (1998). Interactions of the males and the females of three sympatric Drosophila virilis group species, D. montana, D. littoralis and D. lummei, in intra- and interspecific courtships in the wild and in laboratory. J. Insect Behav. 11: 399-417.
22. Liimatainen JO, Hoikkala A, Aspi J and Wellbergen P, (1992). Courtship in Drosophila montana: the effects of male auditory signals on the behaviour of the flies. Anim. Behav. 43: 35-48.
23. McRobert SP, Schnee FB and Tompkins L, (1995). Selection for increased sexual receptivity in raised stocks of Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 25: 303-309.
24. Pineiro R, Carracedo MC, Izquierdo JI and Casares P, (1993). Bidirectional selection for female receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genetics 23: 77-83.
25. Schilcher F von, (1976). The function of pulse song and sine song in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 24: 622-625.
26. Spieth HT and Ringo JM, (1983). Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila. In: The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Vol 3c (eds. M. Ashburner, HL Carson and JN Thompson). Academic Press, New York, p. 223-284.
27. Ritchie MG, Townhill RM and Hoikkala A, (1998). Female preference for fly song: playback experiments confirm the targets of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 56: 713-717.
28. Ritchie MG and Phillips SDF, (1998). The genetics of sexual isolation. In: Endless forms: species and speciation. (eds. DA Howard and WF Doolittle). Oxford University Press, New York, p. 291-308.
29. Tomaru M, Matsubayashi H and Oguma Y, (1995). Heterospecific inter-pulse intervals of courtship song elicit female refection on Drosophila biauraria. Anim. Behav. 50: 905-914.
30. Vuoristo M, Isoherranen E and Hoikkala A, (1996). Female wing spreading as acceptance signal in the Drosohila virilis group of species. J. Insect Behav. 9: 505-516.