Prediction of protein functional specificity without an alignment

OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 56-65

  Fomenko, Andrey ^a   Filimonov, Dmitry ^a   Sobolev, Boris ^a   Poroikov, Vladimir ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL CHEMISTRY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENZYME; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; B STATISTICS; BAYES THEOREM; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; MULTILEVEL NEIGHBORHOODS OF ATOM; NOMENCLATURE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICS; SYMBOLISM;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; MATHEMATICS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 33645917038     PISSN: 15362310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/omi.2006.10.56     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ALTSCHUL, S.F., and GISH, W. (1996). Local alignment statistics. Methods Enzymol 266, 460-480.
2. ALTSCHUL, S.F., MADDEN, T.L., SCHAFFER, A.A., et al. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389-3402.
3. ATTWOOD, T.K., CRONING, M.D., FLOWER, D.R., et al. (2000). PRINTS-S: the database formerly known as PRINTS. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 225-227.
4. BABBITT, P.C. (2003). Definitions of enzyme function for the structural genomics era. Curr Opin Chem Biol 7, 230-237.
5. BAIROCH, A. (2000). The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 304-305.
6. BORODINA, Y., RUDIK, A., FILIMONOV, D., et al. (2004). A new statistical approach to predicting aromatic hydroxylation sites. Comparison with model-based approaches. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44, 1998-2009.
7. CASARI, G., SANDER, C., and VALENCIA, A. (1995). A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 2, 171-178.
8. DEL SOL MESA, A., PAZOS, F., and VALENCIA, A. (2003). Automatic methods for predicting functionally important residues. J Mol Biol 326, 1289-1302.
9. DEVOS, D., and VALENCIA, A. (2000). Practical limits of functional prediction. Proteins 41, 98-107.
10. DEVOS, D., and VALENCIA, A. (2001). Intrinsic errors in genome annotation. Trends Genet 17, 429-431.
11. EDDY, S.R. (1998). Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 14, 755-763.
12. FILIMONOV, D., POROIKOV, V., BORODINA, Y., et al. (1999). Chemical Similarity Assessment through multilevel neighborhoods of atoms: definition and comparison with the other descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39, 666-670.
13. FOMENKO, A.E., SOBOLEV, B.N., FILIMONOV, D.A., et al. (2003). Use of structural MNA descriptors for designing profiles of protein families. Biofizika 48, 595-605.
14. GALPERIN, M.Y., WALKER, D.R., and KOONIN, E.V. (1998). Analogous enzymes: independent inventions in enzyme evolution. Genome Res 8, 779-790.
15. HANNENHALLI, S.S., and RUSSEL, R.B. (2000). Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 303, 61-76.
16. HENIKOFF, J.G., GREENE, E.A., PIETROKOVSKI, S., et al. (2000). Increased coverage of protein families with the blocks database servers. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 228-230.
17. HOLM, L., and SANDER, C. (1996). Mapping the protein universe. Science 273, 595-602.
18. KALININA, O.V., MIRONOV, A.A., GELFAND, M.S., et al. (2004). Automated selections of positions determining-functional specificity of proteins by comparative analysis of orthologous groups in protein families. Protein Sci 13, 443-456.
19. LANDGRAF, R., XENARIOS, I., and EISENBERG, D. (2001). Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J Mol Biol 307, 1487-1502.
20. LIGHTARGE, O., BOURNE, H.R., and COHEN, F.E. (1996). An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 257, 342-358.
21. LIVINGSTONE, C.D., and BARTON, G.J. (1993). Protein sequence alignment: a strategy for the hierarchical analysis of residue conservation. Comput Appl Biosci 9, 745-756.
22. MIRNY, L.A., and GELFAND, M.S. (2002). Using orthologous and paralogous proteins to identify specificity-determining residues in bacterial transcription factors. J Mol Biol 321, 7-20.
23. ORENGO, C.A., MICHIE, A.D., JONES, S., et al. (1997). CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 15, 1093-1108.
24. PEARSON, W.R. (2000). Flexible sequence similarity searching with the FASTA3 program package. Methods Mol Biol 132, 185-219.
25. POROIKOV, V., and FILIMONOV, D. (2005). PASS: prediction of biological activity spectra for substances. In Predictive Toxicology. C. Helma, eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 459-478.
26. ROSE, T., and DI CERA, E. (2002). Substrate recognition drives the evolution of serine proteases. J Biol Chem 277, 19243-19246.
27. ROST, B., LIU, J., and NAIR, R., et al. (2003). Automatic prediction of protein function. Cell Mol Life Sci 60, 2637-2650.
28. SIGRIST, C.J., CERUTTI, L., HULO, N., et al. (2002). PROSITE: a documented database using patterns and profiles as motif descriptors. Brief Bioinform 3, 265-274.
29. THORNTON, J.M., ORENGO, C.A., TODD, A.E., et al. (1999). Protein folds, functions and evolution. J Mol Biol 293, 333-342.
30. TIAN, W., and SKOLNICK, J. (2003). How well is enzyme function conserved as a function of pairwise sequence identity? J Mol Biol 333, 863-882.
31. TIAN, W., ARAKAKI, A.K., and SKOLNICK, J. (2004). EFICAz: a comprehensive approach for accurate genome-scale enzyme function inference. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 6226-6239.
32. TODD, A.E., ORENGO, C.A., and THORNTON J.M. (2001). Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 307, 1113-1143.
33. WEBB, E.G. (1992). Enzyme Nomenclature 1992. Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Academic Press, New York).
34. WILSON, C.A., KREYCHMAN, J., and GERSTEIN, M. (2000). Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores. J Mol Biol 297, 233-249.