HTself: Self-self based statistical test for low replication microarray studies

DNA Research

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 211-214

  Vêncio, Ricardo Z N ^a   Koide, Tie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Differential gene expression; Homotypical; Low cost; Microarray; Self self; Statistical test; Web server

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE REPLICATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; INTERNET; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; XYLELLA;

EID: 33645841299     PISSN: 13402838     EISSN: 13402838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsi007     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Rockett, J. C. and Hellmann, G. M. 2004, Confirming microarray data - is it really necessary? Genomics, 83, 541-549.
2. Nadon, R. and Shoemaker, J. 2002, Statistical issues with microarrays: processing and analysis, Trends Genet., 18, 265-271.
3. Stolovitzky, G. 2003, Gene selection in microarray data: the elephant, the blind men and our algorithms, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 13, 370-376.
4. Cui, X. and Churchill, G. A. 2003, Statistical tests for differential expression in cDNA microarray experiments, Genome Biol., 4, R210.
5. Yang, I. V., Chen, E., Hasseman, J. P., et al. 2002, Within the fold: assessing differential expression measures and reproducibility in microarray assays, Genome Biol., 3, R62.
6. Tu, Y., Stolovitzky, G., and Klein, U. 2002, Quantitative noise analysis for gene expression microarray experiments, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 14031-14036.
7. Kim, C. C., Joyce, E. A., Chan, K., and Falkow, S. 2002, Improved analytical methods for microarray-based genome-composition analysis, Genome Biol., 11, R65.
8. Tusher, V. G., Tibshirani, R., and Chu, G. 2001, Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5116-5121.
9. Troyanskaya, O. G., Garber, M. E., Brown, P. O., Botstein, D., and Altman, R. B. 2002, Nonparametric methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data, Bioinformatics, 18, 1454-1461.
10. Zhao, Y. and Pan, W. 2003, Modified nonparametric approaches to detecting differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments, Bioinformatics, 19, 1046-1054.
11. Papini-Terzi, F. S., Rocha, F. R., Vêncio, R. Z. N., et al. 2005, Transcription profiling of signal transduction-related genes in sugarcane tissues, DNA Res., 12, 27-38.
12. Koide, T., Zaini, P. A., Moreira, L. M, et al. 2004, DNA microarray-based genome comparison of a pathogenic and a non-pathogenic strain of Xylella fastidiosa delineates genes important for bacterial virulence, J. Bacteriol., 186, 5442-5449.
13. Park, T., Yi, S. G., Kang, S. H., Lee, S., Lee, Y. S., and Simon, R. 2003, Evaluation of normalization methods for microarray data, BMC Bioinformatics, 4, 33.
14. Uchida, S., Nishida, Y., Satou, K., Muta, S., Tashiro, K., and Kuhara, S. 2005, Detection and normalization of biases present in spotted cDNA microarray data: a composite method addressing dye, intensity-dependent, spatially-dependent, and print-order biases, DNA Res., 12, 1-7.
15. Vaquerizas, J. M., Dopazo, J., and Diaz-Uriarte, R. 2004, DNMAD: web-based diagnosis and normalization for microarray data, Bioinformatics, 20, 3656-3658.
16. Dudoit, S., Yang, Y. H., Callow, M. J., and Speed, T. P. 2002, Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments, Statistica Sinica, 12, 111-139.
17. Silverman, B. W. 1986, Density Estimation, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
18. Pashalidis, S., Moreira, L. M., Zaini, P. A., et al. 2004, Whole-genome expression profiling of Xylella fastidiosa in response to growth on glucose, OMICS, 9, 77-90.