Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the glenoid fossa and mandibular condyle bone after bilateral vertical ramus mandibular distraction in a canine model

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 111-119

  Sant'Anna, Eduardo Franzotti ^a,b,c   Gomez, David F ^a,b   Sumner, Dale R ^a   Williams, James M ^a   Figueroa, Alvaro A ^a,b   Ostric, Srdjan A ^b   Theodoru, Spero ^b   Polley, John W ^b  

^a RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Rush Craniofacial Center   (United States)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bone microarchitecture; Condyle; Distraction osteogenesis; Glenoid fossa; Hypoplasia; Mandibular ramus; Micro computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; DOG; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MANDIBLE RESECTION; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TEMPORAL BONE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ANIMAL; BONE DENSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TIME;

ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; DOGS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MODELS, ANIMAL; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; TEMPORAL BONE; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33645837238     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000195373.79012.96     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. McCormick SU, McCarthy JG, Grayson BH, et al. Effect of mandibular distraction on the temporomandibular joint: part 1, canine study. J Craniofac Surg 1995;6:358-363
2. McCormick SU, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG, Staffenberg D, et al. Effect of mandibular distraction on the temporomandibular joint: part 2, clinical study. J Craniofac Surg 1995;6:364-367
3. Stelnicki EJ, Stucki-McCormick SU, Rowe N, McCarthy JG, et al. Remodeling of the temporomandibular joint following mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the transverse dimension. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:647-658
4. Majumdar S. Advances in imaging: impact on studying craniofacial bone structure. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6:48-51
5. Soames RW. Skeletal system. In: Soames RW, ed. Gray's anatomy. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1999:425-712
6. Huiskes R. If bone is the answer, then what is the question? J Anat 2000;197(part 2):145-156
7. Zysset PK. A review of morphology-elasticity relationships in human trabecular bone: theories and experiments. J Biomech 2003;36:1469-1485
8. Judex S, Boyd S, Qin Y-X, et al. Combining high-resoloution micro-computed tomography with material composition to define the quality of bone tissue. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2003;1:11-19
9. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's law: the bone modeling problem. Anat Rec 1990;226:403-413
10. Gross RH. Limb lengthening for stature: another view. J Pediatr Orthop 2005;25:128-129
11. Karaharju-Suvanto T, Peltonen J, Laitinen O, Kahri A, et al. The effect of gradual distraction of the mandible on the sheep temporomandibular joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25:152-156
12. Thurmuller P, Troulis MJ, Rosenberg A, Kaban LB, et al. Changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:1327-1333
13. Fanuscu Ml, Chang TL. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone: microstructural data from maxilla and mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:213-218
14. Bell WH, Kennedy JW 3rd. Biological basis for vertical ramus osteotomies: a study of bone healing and revascularization in adult rhesus monkeys. J Oral Surg 1976;34:215-224
15. Ghafari J, Heeley JD. Condylar adaptation to muscle alteration in the rat. Angle Orthod 1982;52:26-37
16. Liu ZJ, King GJ, Herring SW. Alterations of morphology and microdensity in the condyle after mandibular osteodistraction in the rat. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:918-927
17. Kinney JH, Ladd AJ. The relationship between three-dimensional connectivity and the elastic properties of trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res 1998;13:839-845
18. Parfitt AM. Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. Am J Med 1987;82:68-72
19. Halloran BP, Ferguson VL, Simske SJ, et al. Changes in bone structure and mass with advancing age in the male C57BL/6J mouse. J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:1044-1050
20. Joo Yl, Sone T, Fukunaga M, et al. Effects of endurance exercise on three-dimensional trabecular bone microarchitecture in young growing rats. Bone 2003;33:485-493
21. Weinstein RS, Hutson MS. Decreased trabecular width and increased trabecular spacing contribute to bone loss with aging. Bone 1987;8:137-142
22. Kleerekoper M, Villanueva AR, Stanciu J, et al. The role of three-dimensional trabecular microstructure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1985;37:594-597
23. Giesen EB, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TM, et al. Mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the human mandibular condyle are anisotropic. J Biomech 2001;34:799-803
24. Malinin T, Ouellette EA. Articular cartilage nutrition is mediated by subchondral bone: a long-term autograft study in baboons. Osteoarthr Cartil 2000;8:483-491
25. Giesen EB, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TM, et al. Reduced mechanical load decreases the density, stiffness, and strength of cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:358-363
26. Ruegsegger P, Koller B, Muller R. A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calcif Tissue Int 1996;58:24-29
27. Ding M, Odgaard A, Linde F, Hvid I, et al. Age-related variations in the microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone. J Orthop Res 2002;20:615-621
28. Modlesky CM, Majumdar S, Narasimhan A, Dudley GA, et al. Trabecular bone microarchitecture is deteriorated in men with spinal cord injury. J Bone Miner Res 2004;19:48-55
29. Giesen EB, van Eijden TM. The three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the human mandibular condyle. J Dent Res 2000;79:957-963
30. Arnett GW, Milam SB, Gottesman L. Progressive mandibular retrusion-idiopathic condylar resorption: part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:8-15