Advances in imaging: Impact on studying craniofacial bone structure

Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research

Volumn 6, Issue SUPPL1, 2003, Pages 48-51

  Majumdar, S ^a,b  

^a University of Californias   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Micro imaging; Trabecular architecture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE DISEASE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FACIAL BONE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MICRORADIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SKULL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE DISEASES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FACIAL BONES; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICRORADIOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SKULL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0642273272     PISSN: 16016335     EISSN: 16016343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.234.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bonse U, Busch F, Gunnewig O, et al. 3D computed X-ray tomography of human cancellous bone at 8 lm spatial resolution and 10)4 energy resolution. Bone Mineral 1994;25:25-38.
2. Ciarelli TE, Fyhrie DP, Schaffler MB, Goldstein SA. Variations in three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fractures and in controls. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:32-40.
3. Goldstein SA, Goulet R, McCubbrey D. Measurement and significance of three-dimensional architecture to the mechanical integrity of trabecular bone. Calcif Tissue Int 1993;53(Suppl. 1):S127-S132; discussion S132-S133.
4. Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, Kuhn JL, Brown MB, Feldkamp LA. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1994;27:375-89.
5. Guo XE, McMahon TA, Keaveny TM, Hayes WC, Gibson LJ. Finite element modeling of damage accumulation in trabecular bone under cyclic loading. J Biomech 1994;27:145-55.
6. Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Feldkamp LA, Goulet RW, Jesion G. Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure. J Orthop Res 1990;8:833-42.
7. Muller R, Hahn M, Vogel M, Delling G, Ruegsegger P. Morphometric analysis of non-invasively assessed bone biopsies: comparison of high resolution computed tomography and histologic sections. Bone 1996;8:215-20.
8. Müller R, Koller B, Hildebrand T, Laib A, Gianolini S, Rüegsegger P. Resolution dependency of microstructural properties of cancellous bone based on three-dimensional mu-tomography. Technol Health Care 1996;4:113-19.
9. van Rietbergen B, Majumdar S, Pistoia W, Newitt DC, Kothari M, Laib A, Rüegsegger P. Assessment of cancellous bone mechanical properties from micro-FE models based on micro-CT, pQCT and MR images. Technol Health Care 1998;6:413-20.
10. Jara H, Wehrli FW, Chung H, Ford JC. High-resolution variable flip angle 3D MR imaging of trabecular microstructure in vivo. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:528-39.
11. Majumdar S, Gies A, Jergas M, Grampp S, Genant H. Quantitative measurement of trabecular bone structure using high resolution gradient echo imaging of the distal radius. Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, New York; 1993.
12. Wu Z, Chung H, Wehrli F. Sub-voxel tissue classification in NMR microscopic images of trabecular bone. Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, New York; 1993.
13. Chung HW, Wehrli FW, Williams JL, Kugelmass SD, Wehrli SL. Quantitative analysis of trabecular microstructure by 400 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:803-11.
14. Majumdar S, Newitt D, Mathur A, Osman D, Gies A, Chiu E, Lotz J, Kinney J, Genant H. Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics. Osteoporos Int 1996;6:376-85.
15. Kuehn B, Stampa B, Heller M, Glueer C. In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure of the human phalanges using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:291.
16. Majumdar S, Kothari M, Augat P, Newitt DC, Link TM, Lin JC, Lang T, Lu Y, Genant HK. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties. Bone 1998;22:445-54.
17. Majumdar S, Newitt D, Kothari M, et al. Measuring 3D trabecular structure and anisotropy using magnetic resonance (MR). Osteoporos Int 1997;7:272.
18. Kothari M, Newitt D, Majumdar S. Accounting for partial volume effects in trabecular structure assessment using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with optical imaging. Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia; 1998.
19. Link TM, Majumdar S, Augat P, et al. In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients. J Bone Miner Res 1998;13:1175-82.
20. Lang T, Augat P, Majumdar S, Ouyang X, Genant HK. Noninvasive assessment of bone density and structure using computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Bone 1998;22:149S-153S.
21. Link TM, Majumdar S, Lin JC, et al. A comparative study of trabecular bone properties in the spine and femur using high resolution MRI and CT. J Bone Miner Res 1998;13:122-32.
22. Majumdar S, Newitt D, Jergas M, et al. Evaluation of technical factors affecting the quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging. Bone 1995;17:417-30.
23. Majumdar S, Link TM, Augat P, et al. Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int 1999;10:231-9.
24. Pothuaud L, Porion P, Levitz P, Benhamou CL. 3D thresholding of trabecular bone images obtained by magnetic resonance imaging: effect of the threshold value on the 3D microarchitecture. 20th Annual Meeting of ASBM Toronto, Canada; 2000.
25. Wehrli FW, Gomberg BR, Saha PK, Song HK, Hwang SN, Snyder PJ. Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:1520-31.