Pollination and seed predation by moths on Silene and allied Caryophyllaceae: Evaluating a model system to study the evolution of mutualisms

New Phytologist

Volumn 169, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 667-680

  Kephart, Susan ^a   Reynolds, Richard J ^b   Rutter, Matthew T ^b   Fenster, Charles B ^b   Dudash, Michele R ^b  

^a WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Caryophyllaceae; Hadena and Perizoma; Moths; Mutualism; Nursery pollination; Parasitism; Seed predators; Silene

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; COEVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MORPHOLOGY; MOTH; MUTUALISM; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLINATION; SEED PREDATION;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CARYOPHYLLACEAE; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; METABOLISM; MOTH; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; REVIEW; SILENE; SYMBIOSIS;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CARYOPHYLLACEAE; EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTHS; POLLEN; SEEDS; SILENE; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 33645744473     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01619.x     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Alatalo J, Molau U. 2001. Pollen viability and limitation of seed production in a population of the circumpolar cushion plant, Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 21: 365-372.
2. Biere A. 1995. Genotypic and plastic variation in plant size: effects on fecundity and allocation patterns in Lychnis flos-cuculi along a gradient of natural soil fertility. Journal of Ecology 83: 629-642.
3. Biere A, Honders S. 2006. Coping with third parties in a nursery pollination mutualism: Hadena bicruris avoids oviposition on pathogen-infected, less rewarding Silene latifolia. New Phytologist. (In press.) doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01511.x
4. Blair A, Wolfe L. 2004. The evolution of an invasive plant: an experimental study with Silene latifolia. Ecology 85: 3035-3042.
5. Bopp S, Gottsberger G. 2004. Importance of Silene latifolia ssp alba and S. dioica (Caryophyllaceae) as host plants of the parasitic pollinator Hadena bicruris (Lepitdoptera, Noctuidae). Oikos 105: 221-228.
6. Brantjes N. 1976a. Riddles around pollination of Melandrium album (Mill) Garcke (Caryophyllaceae) during oviposition by Hadena bicruris Hufn (Noctuidae Lepidoptera). 1. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Van Wetenschappen Series C - Biological and Medical Sciences 79: 1-12.
7. Brantjes N. 1976b. Prevention of super-parasitism of Melandrium flowers (Caryophyllaceae) by Hadena (Lepidoptera). Oecologia 24: 1-6.
8. Brantjes N. 1976c. Riddles around pollination of Melandrium album (Mill) Garcke (Caryophyllaceae) during oviposition by Hadena bicruris Hufn (Noctuidae Lepidoptera). 2. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Van Wetenschappen Series C - Biological and Medical Sciences 79: 127-141.
9. Brown E, Kephart S. 1999. Variability in pollen load: implications for reproduction and seedling vigor in a rare plant Silene douglasii var. oraria. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: 1145-1152.
10. Buide M, Guitián J. 2002. Breeding system in the dichogamous hermaphrodite Silene acutifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Annals of Botany 90: 691-699.
11. Carlsson-Graner U, Elmqvist T, Agren J, Gardfjell H, Ingvarsson P. 1998. Floral sex ratios, disease, and seed set in dioecious Silene dioica. Journal of Ecology 86: 76-91.
12. Collin C, Pennings P, Rueffler C, Widmer A, Shykoff J. 2002. Natural enemies and sex: how seed predators and pathogens contribute to sex differential reproductive success in a gynodioecious plant. Oecologia 131: 94-102.
13. Dafni A, Kevan P, Husband B. 2005. Practical Pollination Biology. Cambridge, ON, Canada: Enviroquest.
14. Dale C, Young S, Haydon D, Welburn S. 2001. The insect symbiont Sodalis glossinidius utilizes a type III secretion system for cell invasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 1883-1888.
15. Datwyler S, Weiblen G. 2004. On the origin of the fig: phylogenetic relationship of Moraceae from ndhF sequences. American Journal of Botany 91: 767-777.
16. Delph L, Carroll S. 2001. Factors affecting relative seed fitness and female frequency in a gynodioecious species, Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae). Evolutionary Ecology Research 3: 487-505.
17. Dötterl S, Wolfe L, Jürgens A. 2005. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of flower scent in Silene latifolia. Phytochemistry 66: 203-213.
18. Dötterl S, Jürgens A, Seifert K, Laube T, Weißbecker B, Schütz S. 2006. Nursery pollination by a moth in Silene latifolia: the role of odours in eliciting antennal and behavioural responses. New Phytologist. (In press.) doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01509.x
19. Dudash M, Fenster C. 1997. Multiyear study of pollen limitation and cost of reproduction in the iteroparous Silene virginica. Ecology 78: 484-493.
20. Dufay M, Anstett M. 2003. Conflicts between plants and pollinators that reproduce within inflorescences. Oikos 100: 3-14.
21. Elzinga J, Turin H, Van Damme J, Biere A. 2005. Plant population size and isolation affect herbivory of Silene latifolia by the specialist herbivore Hadena bicruris and parasitism of the herbivore by parasitoids. Oecologia 144: 416-426.
22. Erhardt A. 1988. Pollination and reproduction in Dianthus silvester Wulf. In: Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E, eds. Proceedings of the Tenth Internation Symposium on the Sexual Reproduction of Higher Plants. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 351-356.
23. Erhardt A. 1990. Pollination of Dianthus gratianopolitanus (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 170: 125-132.
24. Erhardt A. 1991. Pollination of Dianthus superbus L. Flora 185: 99-106.
25. Erhardt A, Jaggi B. 1995. From pollination by Lepidoptera to selfing: the case of Dianthus glacialis (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 195: 67-76.
26. Faegri K, van der Pijl L. 1979. Principles of Pollination Ecology. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
27. Fenster C, Armbruster W, Wilson P, Dudash M, Thomson J. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35: 375-403.
28. Fenster C, Dudash M. 2001. Spatiotemporal variation in the role of hummingbirds as pollinators of Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Ecology 82: 844-851.
29. Fleming T, Holland J. 1998. The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: senita cactus and senita moth. Oecologia 133: 534-540.
30. Giles B, Pettersson T, Corlsson-Granér U, Ingvarsson P. 2006. Natural selection on floral traits of female Silene dioica by a sexually transmitted disease. New Phytologist. (In press.) doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005. 01544.x
31. Goulson D, Jerrim K. 1997. Maintenance of the species boundary between Silene dioica and S latifolia (red and white campion). Oikos 70: 115-126.
32. Herre E, Knowlton N, Mueller U, Rehner S. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 49-53.
33. Holland J, Fleming T. 2002. Co-pollinators and specialization in the pollinating seed-consumer mutualism between senita cacti and senita moths. Oecologia 133: 534-540.
34. Inouye D, Gill D, Dudash M, Fenster C. 1994. A model and lexicon for pollen fate. American Journal of Botany 81: 1517-1530.
35. Jennersten O. 1988a. Pollination of Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae): the contributions of diurnal and nocturnal insects to seed set and seed predation. Oikos 52: 310-327.
36. Jennersten O. 1988b. Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): Effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conservation Biology 2: 359-366.
37. Jennersten O, Nilsson S. 1993. Insect flower visitation frequency and seed production in relation to patch size of Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Oikos 68: 283-292.
38. Jürgens A. 2004. Flower scent composition in diurnal Silene species (Caryophyllaceae): phylogenetic constraints or adaptation to flower visitors? Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32: 841-859.
39. Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G. 1996. Reproduction and pollination in Central European populations of Silene and Saponaria species. Botanica Acta 109: 316-324.
40. Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G. 2002a. Flower scent composition in night-flowering Silene species (Caryophyllaceae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 30: 383-397.
41. Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G. 2002b. Pollen grain numbers, ovule numbers and pollen- ovule ratios in Caryophylloideae: correlation with breeding system, pollination, life form, style number, and sexual system. Sexual Plant Reproduction 14: 279-289.
42. Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G. 2003. Flower scent composition in Dianthus and Saponaria species (Caryophyllaceae) and its relevance for pollination biology and taxonomy. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31: 345-357.
43. Kephart S, Brown E, Hall J. 1999. Inbreeding depression and partial selfing: evolutionary implications of mixed-mating in a coastal endemic, Silene douglasii var. oraria (Caryophyllaceae). Heredity 82: 543-554.
44. Lesica P, Heidel B. 1996. Pollination Biology of Silene Spaldingii. Report. Helena, MT, USA: Montana Natural Heritage Program (available on request).
45. Menges E. 1995. Factors limiting fecundity and germination in small populations of Silene regia (Caryophyllaceae), a rare hummingbird-pollinated prairie forb. American Midland Naturalist 133: 242-255.
46. Müller H. 1873. Die Befruchtung der Blumen durch Insekten und die gegendeitigen Anpassungen beider. Liepzig, Germany: Wilhelm Engelmann.
47. Oxelman B, Lidén M, Rabeler Royal, Popp M. 2001. A revised generic classification of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 20: 513-518.
48. Pellmyr O. 2003. Yuccas, yucca moths, and coevolution: a review. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90: 35-55.
49. Pettersson MW. 1991a. Flower herbivory and seed predation in Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Effects of pollination and phenology. Holarctic Ecology 14: 45-50.
50. Pettersson M. 1991b. Pollination by a guild of fluctuation moth populations option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris. Journal of Ecology 79: 591-604.
51. Pettersson M. 1992. Taking a chance on moths: oviposition by Delia flavifrons (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) on the flowers of bladder campion Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Ecological Entomology 17: 57-62.
52. Pettersson M. 1997. Solitary plants do as well as clumped ones in Silene uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Ecography 20: 375-382.
53. Robinson G, Ackery P, Kitching I, Beccaloni G, Hernández L. 2005. HOSTS: a database of the hostplants of the world's Lepidoptera. [online 5 August 2005]. London, UK: Natural History Museum. (website: http:// www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/projects/hostplants)
54. Rutter M, Rausher M. 2004. Natural selection on extrafloral nectar production in Chamaecrista fasciculata: the costs and benefits of a mutualism trait. Evolution 58: 2567-2668.
55. Sakela M. 2005. Lepidoptera, Geometroidea and Noctuioidea [online 25 February 2005]. website: http://www.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/ lepidoptera/ditrysia
56. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS for Windows, Version 9.1. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.
57. Seppänen E. 1970. Suomen suurperhostoukkien ravin to kasvit. Animalia Fennica 14: 1-179.
58. Showers M. 1987. A systematic study of Silene suksdorfii, S. grayi, and S. sargentii (Caryophyllaceae). Madrono 34: 29-40.
59. Shykoff J. 1992. Sex polymorphism in Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae) and the possible role of sexual selection in maintaining females. American Journal of Botany 79: 138-143.
60. Shykoff J, Bucheli E. 1995. Pollinator visitation patterns, floral rewards and the probability of transmission of Microbotryum violaceum, a venereal disease of plants. Journal of Ecology 83: 189-198.
61. Strauss S, Sahli H, Conner J. 2005. Toward a more trait centered approach to diffuse (co) evolution. New Phytologist 165: 81-89.
62. Talavera S, Arista M, Salgueiro F. 1996. Population size, pollination, and breeding system of Silene stockenii Chater (Caryophyllaceae) and annual gynodioecious species of southern Spain. Botanica Acta 109: 333-339.
63. Thompson J, Cunningham B. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417: 735-738.
64. Thompson J, Pellmyr O. 1992. Mutualism with pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: Constraints on specialization. Ecology 73: 1780-1791.
65. Thomson J. 2003. When is it mutualism? 2001 Presidential Address, American Society of Naturalists. American Naturalist 162: S1-S9.
66. Troubridge J, Crabo L. 2002. A review of the Nearctic species of Hadena Schrank, 1802 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with descriptions of six new species. Fabreries 27: 109-154.
67. Weiblen G. 2002. How to be a fig wasp. Annual Review of Entomology 47:299-230.
68. Westerbergh A. 2004. An interaction between a specialize seed predator moth and its dioecious host plant shifting from parasitism to mutualism. Oikos 105: 564-574.
69. Westerbergh A, Westerbergh J. 2001. Interactions between seed predators/pollinators and their host plants: a first step towards mutualism? Oikos 95: 324-334.
70. Wolfe L. 2002. Why alien invaders succeed: Support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. American Naturalist 160: 705-711.
71. Wright J, Meagher T. 2003. Pollination and seed predation drive flowering phenology in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Ecology 84: 2062-2073.