Evaluating models of object-decision priming: Evidence from event-related potential repetition effects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 230-248

  Soldan, Anja ^a   Mangels, Jennifer A ^a   Cooper, Lynn A ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potential; Implicit memory; Perceptual; Structural description system

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33645732223     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.230     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Allan, K., Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. Acta Psychologia, 98, 231-252.
2. Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551-565.
3. Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999). ERP manifestations of processing printing words at different psycholinguistic levels: Time course and scalp distribution. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 235-260.
4. Buckner, R. L., Goodman, J., Burock, M., Rotte, M., Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D., et al. (1998). Functional-anatomic correlates of object priming in humans revealed by rapid presentation event-related fMRI. Neuron, 20, 285-296.
5. Buckner, R. L., Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., & Rosen, B. R. (2000). Functional MRI evidence for a role of frontal and inferior temporal cortex in amodal components of priming. Brain, 123, 620-640.
6. Campanella, S., Hanoteau, C., Depy, D., Rossion, B., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., & Guerit, J. M. (2000). Right N170 modulation in a face discrimination task: An account for categorical perception of familiar faces. Psychophysiology, 37, 796-806.
7. Cooper, L. A., & Schacter, D. L. (1992). Dissociations between structural and episodic representations of visual objects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(5), 141-146.
8. Cooper, L. A., Schacter, D. L., Ballesteros, S., & Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 43-57.
9. Curran, T., Tanaka, J. W., & Weiskopf, D. M. (2002). An electrophysiological comparison of visual categorization and recognition memory. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral. Neuroscience, 2, 1-18.
10. Di Russo, R., Martinez, A., & Hillyard, S. A. (2003). Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-ispatial attention. Cerebral Cortex, 13 (5), 486-499.
11. Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95-111.
12. Doniger, G. M., Foxe, J. J., Murray, M. M., Higgins, B. A., Snodgrass, J. G., Schroeder, C. E., & Javitt, D. C. (2000). Activation timecourse of ventral visual stream object-recognition areas: High-density electrical mapping of perceptual closure processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 615-621.
13. Doniger, G. M., Foxe, J. J., Schroeder, C. E., Murray, M. M., Higgins, B. A., & Javilt, D. C. (2001). Visual perceptual learning in human object recognition areas: A repetition priming study using high-density electrical mapping. NeuroImage, 13, 305-313.
14. Düzel, E., Yonelinas, A. P., Mangun, G. R., Heinze, H. J., & Tulving, E. (1997). Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94, 5973-5978.
15. Eimer, M. (2000). The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. NeuroReport, 11, 2319-2324.
16. Fiebach, C. J., Gruber, T., & Supp, G. G. (2005). Neuronal mechanisms of repetition priming in occipitotemporal cortex: Spatiotemporal evidence form functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3414-3422.
17. Foxe, J. J., & Simpson, G. V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans. A framework for defining "early" visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142 (1), 139-150.
18. Friedman, D., & Johnson, R., Jr. (2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research & Technique, 51(1), 6-28.
19. Friedman, D., Ritter, W., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1996). ERPs during study as a function of subsequent direct and indirect memory testing in young and old adults. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 1-13.
20. Ganor-Stern, D., Seamon, J. G., & Carrasco, M. (1998). The role of attention and study time in explicit and implicit memory for unfamiliar visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1187-1195.
21. Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K. M., & Collins, D. (2003). Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 428-432.
22. George, N., Jemel, B., Fiori, N., & Renault, B. (1997). Face and shape repetition effects in humans: A spatio-temporal ERP study. NeuroReport, 8, 1417-1423.
23. Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Ilendler, T., Edelman, S., Itzchak, Y., & Malach, R. (1998). A sequence of object-processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 316-328.
24. Han, S., Fan, S., Chen, L., & Zhuo, Y. (1999). Modulation of brain activities by hierarchical processing: A high-density ERP study. Brain Topography, 11(3), 171-183.
25. Han, S., He, X., & Woods, D. L. (2000). Hierarchical processing and level-repetition effect as indexed by early brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 37, 817-830.
26. Han, S., He, X., Yund, E. W., & Woods, D. L. (2001). Attentional selection in the processing of hierarchical patterns: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 56, 113-130.
27. Han, S., Liu, W., Yund, W., & Woods, D. L. (2000). Interactions between spatial attention and global/local feature selection: An ERP study. NeuroReport, 11, 2753-2758.
28. Henson, R. N. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of priming. Progress in Neurobiology, 70(1), 53-81.
29. Henson, R. N., Rylands, A., Ross, E., Vuilleumier, P., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and hemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. NeuroImage, 21, 1674-1689.
30. Hillyard, S. A., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 781-787.
31. Hilton, H. J., Cooper, L. A., Pavlicic, T., Soldan, A., Warren, I., & Stern, Y. (2002, November). Age related performance in possible/impossible object-decision priming over delay with yoked possible and impossible stimuli. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Orlando, FL.
32. Hilton, H. J., Pavlicic, T., Cooper, L. A., Warren, I. G., & Stern, Y. (2003, November). Age differences in possible/impossible object-decision priming are reduced with a continuous trial-mediated priming para digm. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans. LA.
33. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2002). Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs. NeuroImage, 15, 353-372.
34. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 132-142.
35. Jemel, B., Calabria, M., Delvenne, J., Crommelinck, M., & Bruyer, R. (2003). Differential involvement of episodic and face representations in ERP repetition effects. NeuroReport, 14, 525-530.
36. Kiefer, M. (2001). Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Memory & Cognition, 29, 100-116.
37. Lerner, Y., Hendler, T., Ben-Bashat, D., Harel, M., & Malach, R. (2001). A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 287-297.
38. Lerner, Y., Hendler, T., & Malach, R. (2002). Object-completion effects in the human lateral occipital complex. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 163-177.
39. Liu, T., & Cooper, L. A. (2001). The influence of task requirements on priming in object-decision and matching. Memory & Cognition, 29, 874-882.
40. Mangels, J. A., Picton, T. W., & Craik, F. I. (2001). Attention and successful episodic encoding: An event-related potential study. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 77-95.
41. Mangun, G. R. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 32, 4-18.
42. Martinez, A., Anllo-Vento, L., Sereno, M. I., Frank, L. R., Buxton, R. B., Dubowitz, D. J., et al. (1999). Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience, 2 (4), 264-369.
43. Martinez, A., Di Russo, F., Anllo-Vento, L., & Hillyard, S. A. (2001). Electrophysiological analysis of cortical mechanisms of selective attention to high and low spatial frequencies. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 1980-1998.
44. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1995). How should implicit memory phenomena be modeled? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 777-784.
45. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (2001). Counter model for word identification: Reply to Bowers (1999). Psychological Review, 108, 674-681.
46. Mecklinger, A. (2000). Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 37, 565-582.
47. Paller, K. A. (1990). Recall and stem-completion priming have different electrophysiological correlates and are modified differentially by directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1021-1032.
48. Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., & Mayes, A. R. (1987). Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 67, 360-371.
49. Paller. K. A., Kutas, M., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1987). Brain responses to concrete and abstract words reflect processes that correlate with later performance on a test of stem-completion priming. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 40(Suppl.), 360-365.
50. Paller, K. A., & Wagner, A. D. (2002). Observing the transformation of experience into memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 93-102.
51. Penney, T. B., Mecklinger, A., Hilton, H. J., & Cooper, L. A. (2000). Priming and recognition of novel 3D objects: Guidance from eventrelated potentials. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 69-92.
52. Penney, T. B., Mecklinger, A., & Nessler, D. (2001). Repetition related ERP effects in a visual object target detection task. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 239-250.
53. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S., Johnson, R. J., et al. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
54. Poldrack, R. (1996). On testing for stochastic dissociations. Psychanomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 434-448.
55. Pourtois, G., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2004). Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. Cerebral Cortex, 14 (6), 619-633.
56. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1995). Bias in the priming of object-decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 754-767.
57. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1996). Bias effects in implicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 403-421.
58. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review, 104, 319-343.
59. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2000). Modeling the effects of repetition and word frequency in perceptual identification. Psychanomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 713-717.
60. Rossion, B., Curran, T., & Gauthier, I. (2002). A defense of the subordinate-level expertise account for the N170 component. Cognition, 85, 189-196.
61. Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, C. S., & Allan, K. (1998, April 9). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 392, 595-598.
62. Rugg, M. D., Soardi, M., & Doyle, M. C. (1995). Modulation of eventrelated potentials by the repetition of drawings of novel objects. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 17-24.
63. Schacter, D. L., & Cooper, L. A. (1993). Implicit and explicit memory for novel visual objects: Structure and function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 995-1009.
64. Schacter, D. L., & Cooper, L. A. (1995). Bias in the priming of object decisions: Logic, assumption, and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 768-776.
65. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., & Delaney, S. M. (1990a). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 5-24.
66. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., & Delaney, S. M. (1990b). Implicit memory for visual objects and the structural description system. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 367-372.
67. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., Delaney, S. M., Peterson, M. A., & Tharan, M. (1991). Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 3-19.
68. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., Tharan, M., & Rubens, A. B. (1991). Preserved priming of novel objects in patients with memory disorders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 117-130.
69. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., & Treadwell, J. (1993). Preserved priming of novel objects across size transformation in amnesic patients. Psychological Science, 4, 331-335.
70. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., & Valdiserri, M. (1992). Implicit and explicit memory for novel visual objects in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 7, 299-308.
71. Schendan, H. E., Ganis, G., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. Psychophysiology, 35, 240-251.
72. Schendan, H. H., & Kutas, M. (2002). Neurophysiological evidence for two processing times for visual object identification. Neuropsychologia, 40, 931-945.
73. Schendan, H. E., & Kutas, M. (2003). Time course of processes and representations supporting visual object identification and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 111-135.
74. Schott, B., Richardson-Klavehn, A., Heinze, H. J., & Düzel, E. (2002). Perceptual priming versus explicit memory: Dissociable neural correlates at encoding. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 578-592.
75. Schweinberger, S. R., Pfütze, E. M., & Sommer, W. (1995). Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 722-736.
76. Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Jentzsch, I., Burton, M., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2002). Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 398-409.
77. Seamon, J. G., & Carrasco, M. (1999). The effect of study time on priming possible and impossible figures in the object-decision test. Psicothema, 11, 801-819.
78. Seeck, M., Michel, C. M., Mainwaring, N., Cosgrove, R., Blume, H., Ives, J., et al. (1997). Evidence for rapid face recognition from human scalp and intracranial electrodes. Neuroreport, 8, 2749-2754.
79. Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C., & Pernier, J. (1997). Oscillatory gamma-band (30-70 Hz) activity induced by a visual search task in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 722-734.
80. Tanaka, J. W. (2001). The entry point of face recognition: Evidence for face expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 534-543.
81. Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. (2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 43-47.
82. Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A., & Collins, D. (2004, April). The N250 ERP component as an index of experimentally-induced and preexperimentally familiar faces. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco.
83. Tanaka, J., Luu, P., Weisbrod, M., & Kiefer, M. (1999). Tracking the timecourse of object categorization using event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 10, 829-835.
84. Taylor, M. J. (2002). Non-spatial attentional effects on PI. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1903-1908.
85. Thiel, C. M., Henson, R. N., Morris, J. S., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Pharmacological modulation of behavioral and neuronal correlates of repetition priming. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 6846-6852.
86. Trenner, M. U., Schweinberger, S. R., Jentzsch, I., & Sommer, W. (2004). Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: An event-related brain potentials study. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 388-400.
87. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990, January 19). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-306.
88. Uecker, A., Reiman, E. M., Schacter, D. L., Polster, M. R., Cooper, L. A., Yun, L. S., & Chen, K. (1997). Neuroanatomical correlates of implicit and explicit memory for structurally possible and impossible visual objects. Learning & Memory, 4, 337-355.
89. Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37, 190-203.
90. Vuilleumier, P., Henson, R. N., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 491-499.
91. Wiggs, C. L., & Martin, A. (1998). Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 227-233.
92. Williams, P. C., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Structural processing and implicit memory for possible and impossible figures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1344-1361.
93. Winocur, G., Moscovitch, M., & Stuss, D. T. (1996). Explicit and implicit memory in the elderly: Evidence for double dissociation involving temporal- and frontal-lobe functions. Neuropsychology, 10, 57-65.
94. Zarahn, E., Hilton, H. J., Flynn, J., Cooper, L. A., & Stern, Y. (2004). Differences in neural responses and repetition suppression between structurally possible and impossible line drawings: Evidence in support of a structural descriptive system. Manuscript in preparation.