On testing for stochastic dissociations

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 434-448

  Poldrack, Russell A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000969685     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03214547     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AGRESTI, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. BISHOP, Y. V., FIENBERG, S. E., & HOLLAND, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. CAPLAN, D. (1992). Language: Structure, processing, and disorders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. CHATTERJEE, S., & DELANEY, N. J. (1988). Contingencies for analysis of contingency tables: More on the chi-square test. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 41, 235-249.
5. COHEN, N. J., & EICHENBAUM, H. (1993). Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. EICH, E. (1984). Memory for unattended events: Remembering with and without awareness. Memory & Cognition, 12, 105-111.
7. FLEXSER, A. J. (1981). Homogenizing the 2 × 2 contingency table: A method for removing dependencies due to subject and item differ-ences. Psychological Review, 88, 327-339.
8. FODOR, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. GARDINER, J. M. (1991). Contingency relations in successive tests: Accidents do not happen. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 334-337.
10. GAZZANIGA, M. (ED.) (1994). The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. HAYMAN, C. G., & TULVING, E. (1989a). Contingent dissociations between recognition and fragment completion: The method of triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 228-240.
12. HAYMAN, C. G., & TULVING, E. (1989b). Is priming in fragment completion based on a "traceless" memory system? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 941-956.
13. HAYS, W. L. (1988). Statistics. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
14. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1980). Simpson's paradox and the analysis of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 87, 398-410.
15. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1990). Human learning and memory: Connections and dissociations. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 109-139.
16. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1991). Contingency analyses, hypotheses, and artifacts: Reply to Flexser and Gardiner. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 341-345.
17. HINTZMAN, D. L., & HARTRY, A. L. (1990). Item effects in recognition and fragment completion: Contingency relations vary for different subsets of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 955-969.
18. JACOBY, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 485-508.
19. MARTIN, E. (1981). Simpson's paradox resolved: A reply to Hintzman. Psychological Review, 4, 372-374.
20. OSTERGAARD, A. L. (1992). A method for judging measures of stochastic dependence: Further comments on the current controversy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 413-420.
21. OSTERGAARD, A. L. (1994). Who is mistaken about priming in "recognition/identification" experiments? A reply to Tulving and Hayman. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 1-11.
22. POSNER, M. I., & PETERSON, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
23. PRESS, W. H., TEUKOLSKY, S. A., VETTERLING, W. T., & FLANNERY, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in C (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63-131). New York: Elsevier.
25. SCHACTER, D. L., COOPER, L. A., & DELANEY, S. M. (1990). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends upon access to structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 5-24.
26. SCHACTER, D. L., COOPER, L. A., DELANEY, S. M., PETERSON, M. A., & THARAN, M. (1991). Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 3-19.
27. SHIMAMURA, A. P. (1985). Problems with the finding of stochastic independence as evidence for multiple memory systems. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 506-508.
28. SLOMAN, S. A., HAYMAN, C. G., OHTA, N., LAW, J., & TULVING, E. (1988). Forgetting in primed fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 223-239.
29. TULVING, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 4, 385-398.
30. TULVING, E., & HAYMAN, C. G. (1993). Stochastic independence in the recognition/identification paradigm. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 353-373.
31. TULVING, E., SCHACTER, D. L., & STARK, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8, 336-342.
32. WICKENS, T. D. (1989). Multiway contingency tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. WICKENS, T. D. (1993). Analysis of contingency tables with between-subjects variability. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 191-204.
34. WITHERSPOON, D., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (1989). Stochastic independence between two implicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 22-30.