The teacher effectiveness movement: How 80 years of essentialist control have shaped the teacher education profession

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 167-180

  Imig, David G ^a,c   Imig, Scott R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c American Association   (United States)

Author keywords

Essentialists; Progressives; Teacher effectiveness

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645696518     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487105285672     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abell Foundation. (2001). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality. Baltimore: Author.
2. Allen, M. (2003). Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say? Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
3. Ballou, D., and Podgursky, B. M. (2000). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: Continuing the debate. Teachers College Record, 102 (1). 5-27.
4. Berliner, D. C. (1979). Tempus educare. In P. Peterson - H. Walberg (Eds.), Research in teaching (pp. 120-135). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
5. Carnegie Corporation of New York. (2001). Teachers for a New Era prospectus. New York: Author. Retrieved June 8, 2005, from http://carnegie.org/ sub/program/teachers_prospectus.html
6. Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Taking stock in 2004: Teacher education in dangerous times. Journal of Teacher Education, 55 (1). 3-5.
7. Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Teacher education and the outcomes trap. Journal of Teacher Education, 56 (5). 411-417.
8. Cochran-Smith, M., and Zeichner, K. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Council of Chief State School Officers. (2005). INTASC standards development. Retrieved December 26, 2005, from http://www.ccsso.org/Projects/ interstate_new_teacher_assessment_and_support_consortium/projects/ standards_development/791.cfm
10. Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). (2000). Studies of excellence in teacher education. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.
11. Darling-Hammond, L., and Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Dewey, J. (1933). How wethink. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath Education of All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-142.
13. Evertson, C. M. (1982). Differences in instructional activities in higher and lower achieving junior high English and math classes. Elementary School Journal, 82 (4). 329-351.
14. Ferguson, P., and Womack, S. T. (1993). The impact of subject matter and education coursework on teaching performance. Journal of Teacher Education, 44 (1). 55-63.
15. Flexner, A. (1910). Medical education in the United States and Canada: A report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
16. Frazier, J. (in press). Preparing the American teacher: Teacher education in the United States, 1776-2006. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Gage, N. (1972). Teacher effectiveness and teacher education. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Books.
18. Glass, G. V. (1990). Using student test scores to evaluate teachers. In J. Millman - L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 229-240). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Goldhaber, D. D., and Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22 (2). 129-146.
20. Good, T. L., and Brophy, J. E. (1986). School effects. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 570-602). New York: Macmillan.
21. Goodlad, J. I. (1990). Teachers for our nation's schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Gutek, G. L. (2004). Philosophical and ideological voices in education. Boston: Allyn Bacon.
23. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19 (2). 141-164.
24. Johnson, J., and Duffett, A. (2005). Attitudes about teaching: Including the views of parents, administrators, teachers and the general pubic. New York: Public Agenda.
25. Kilpatrick, W. H. (1932). Education and the social crisis: A proposed program. New York: Liveright.
26. Koppich, J. (2001). Investing in teaching. Washington, DC: National Alliance of Small Business.
27. Labaree, D. F. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Learned, W. S., and Bagley, W. C. (with McMurry, C. A., Strayer, G. D., Dearborn, W. F., Kandel, I. L., and Josselyn, H. W.). (1920). The professional preparation of teachers for American public schools: A study based upon an examination of tax-supported normal schools in the state of Missouri (Bulletin No. 14). New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
29. Leigh, A., and Mead, S. (2005). Lifting teacher performance policy report. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
30. McCaffrey, D., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D. M., and Hamilton, L. S. (2004). Evaluating value-added models for teacher accountability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
31. Medley, D. (1978). Teacher competence and teacher effectiveness: A review of the process-product research. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
32. Medley, D. (1982). Teacher effectiveness. In H. E. Mitzel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (pp. 1345-1352). New York: Free Press.
33. Medley, D., and Mitzel, H. (1963). Measuring classroom behavior by systematic observation. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 247-328). Chicago: Rand McNally.
34. Mitzel, H. E. (1960). Teacher effectiveness. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (pp. 1481-1485). New York: Macmillan.
35. National Academies. (2005). Study of U.S. teacher education programs (STEP). Retrieved December 5, 2005, from http://www.nationalacademies.org/cfe/ teacherprep.html
36. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
37. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2001). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges and departments of education. Washington, DC: Author.
38. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
39. Null, J. W. (2003). A disciplined progressive educator: The life and career of William Chandler Bagley. New York: Peter Lang.
40. Paige, R. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge: The secretary's annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
41. Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of battles over school reform. New York: Simon-Schuster.
42. Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality, understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
43. Sanders, W. L., and Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value Research and Assessment Center.
44. Stallings, J. (1985). Effective elementary classroom practices. In M. J. Kyle (Ed.), Reaching for excellence: An effective schools sourcebook. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
45. Teaching Commission. (2004). Teaching at risk: A call to action. New York: Author.
46. Wilson, S., Floden, R., and Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for Teaching Policy.