Teacher education and the outcomes trap

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 411-417

  Cochran Smith, Marilyn ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944488654     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487105282112     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Abell Foundation. (2001a, October). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality. Retrieved from http://www.abell.org.
2. Abell Foundation. (2001b, November). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality. A rejoinder. Retrieved from http://www.abell.org.
3. Cochran-Smith, M. (2000). The questions that drive reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 331-333.
4. Cochran-Smith, M, (2001). Constructing outcomes in teacher education: Policy, practice and pitfalls. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 9(11). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/vol9.html/.
5. Cochran-Smith, M. (2005a). The new teacher education: For better or for worse? Educational Researcher, 34(6).
6. Cochran-Smith, M. (2005b). Studying teacher education: What we know and need to know. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 301-306.
7. Cohen, D. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher, 24(9), 11-17, 31.
8. Cuban, L. (2004). Looking through the rearview mirror at school accountability. In K. Sirotnik (Ed.), Holding accountability accountable (pp. 18-34). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The research and rhetoric on teacher certification: A response to "teacher certification reconsidered". Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.nctaf.org.
10. Decker, P., Mayer, D., & Glazerman, S. (2004). The effects of teach for American on students: Findings from a national evaluation (MPR Reference No. 8792-750). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
11. Elmore, R. (2002). The testing trap. Harvard Magazine, 205(1), 35.
12. Fuhrman, S. (Ed.). (2001). From the capital to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states, 100th yearbook of the national society for the scientific study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Palmer.
14. Graham, P., Lyman, R., & Trow, M. (1995). Accountability of colleges and universities: An essay. New York: Columbia University.
15. Grubb, W. N., & Lazerson, M. (2004). The education gospel: The economic power of schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Gutman, A. (1999). Democratic education (with a new preface and epilogue). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Haycock, K. (2005). Choosing to matter more. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(2).
18. Ingersoll, R. (2004). Four myths about America's teacher quality problem. In M. Smylie & D. Miretzky (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce: The 103rd yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 1-33). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Labaree, D. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). The effectiveness of "Teach for America" and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8. Retrieved September 23, 2002, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epasa/v10n37/.
21. Lagemann, E. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Michelli, N., & Keiser, D. (Eds.). (2004). Teacher education for diversity and social justice. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
23. Neville, K. S., Sherman, R. H., & Cohen, C. E. (2005). Preparing and training professionals: Comparing education to six other fields. New York: The Finance Project.
24. Noell, G. (2004, August 24). Assessing teacher preparation program effectiveness: A pilot examination of value added approaches. Baton Rouge: Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning, Louisiana State University.
25. Raymond, M., Fletcher, S. H., & Luque, J. (2001). Teach for America: An evaluation of teacher differences and student outcomes in Houston, Texas. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
26. Southeast Center for Teaching Quality. (2004). Teach for America study reports some gains but obscures failed teaching policies in urban schools. Retrieved June 11, 2004, from http://www.teachingquality.org/resources/html/TFA_Report.htm.
27. The Teaching Commission. (2004). Teaching at risk: A call to action. New York: Author.