Developmental changes in the allocation of semantic feedback during visual word recognition

Journal of Research in Reading

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 194-212

  Reimer, Jason F ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645659238     PISSN: 01410423     EISSN: 14679817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00285.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abboud, H. (1997). SuperLab experimental laboratory software user's guide [Computer software and manual]. Phoenix, AZ: Cedrus Corp.
2. Anderson, J.R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Anderson, J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Becker, C.A. & Killion, T.H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 389-401.
5. Besner, D. & Smith, M.C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 482-486.
6. Booth, J.R., Perfetti, C.A. & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers. Developmental Psychology, 35, 3-19.
7. Borowsky, R. & Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 813-840.
8. Bowey, J.A. (1990). Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading. Memory and Cognition, 18, 419-427.
9. Bowey, J.A. (1993). Orthographic rime priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 247-271.
10. Brown, M. & Besner, D. (2002). Semantic priming: On the role of awareness in visual word recognition in the absence of expectancy. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 402-422.
11. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P. & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
12. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
13. Ehri, L.C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr & M.L. Kamil (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Farrar, W.T. & Van Orden, G.C. (2001). Errors as multistable response options. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 5, 223-265.
15. Farrar, W.T., Van Orden, G.C. & Hamouz, V. (2001). When SOFA primes TOUCH: Interdependence of spelling, sound, and meaning in 'semantically mediated' phonological priming. Memory and Cognition, 29, 530-539.
16. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
17. Grossberg, S. & Stone, G.O. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Attentional priming, learning, and resonance. Psychological Review, 93, 46-74.
18. Hansen, J. & Bowey, J.A. (1992). Orthographic rimes as functional units of reading in fourth-grade children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44, 37-44.
19. Hino, Y. & Lupker, S.J. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1331-1356.
20. Hino, Y., Lupker, S.J. & Pexman, P.M. (2002). Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 686-713.
21. Jacobs, A.M. & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the interaction activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1174-1188.
22. Jacobs, A.M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J.C. & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A.M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Juel, C. (1983). The development and use of mediated word identification. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 306-327.
24. Kucera, H. & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
25. Leslie, L. & Thimke, B. (1986). The use of orthographic knowledge in beginning reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 229-241.
26. Lukatela, G. & Turvey, M.T. (1994a). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
27. Lukatela, G. & Turvey, M.T. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
28. Maisto, A.A. & Sipe, S. (1980). An examination of encoding and retrieval processes in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 223-230.
29. McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
30. McNamara, T.P. (1992a). Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval. Psychological Review, 99, 650-662.
31. McNamara, T.P. (1992b). Theories of priming: I. Associative distance and lag. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1173-1190.
32. Meyer, D.E., Schvaneveldt, R.W. & Ruddy, M.G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P.M.A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V. New York: Academic Press.
33. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
34. Neely, J.H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Role of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
35. Neely, J.H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processing in reading: Visual word recognition. (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Nelson, D.L., McEvoy, C.L. & Schreiber, T.A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
37. Pecher, D. (2001). Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 545-551.
38. Perfetti, C.A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition, (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Perfetti, C.A. & Bell, L. (1991). Speech activation during the first 40 ms of word activation: Evidence from backward masking and masked priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473-485.
40. Perry, C. (2003). A phoneme-grapheme feedback consistency effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2003, 392-397.
41. Pexman, P.M. & Lupker, S.J. (1999). Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 323-334.
42. Pexman, P.M., Lupker, S.J. & Hino, Y. (2002). The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 542-549.
43. Plaut, D.C. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in a distributed attractor network. In Proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 37-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Plaut, D.C. & Booth, J.R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming; Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107, 786-823.
45. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S. & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
46. Reimer, J.F., Brown, J.S. & Lorsbach, T.C. (2001). Orthographically mediated inhibition effects: Evidence of activational feedback during visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 102-110.
47. Rumelhart, D.E. & McClelland, J.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
48. Schneider, W., Eschman, A. & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
49. Schwantes, F.M. (1981). Locus of the context effects in children's word recognition. Child Development, 52, 895-903.
50. Seidenberg, M.S. & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
51. Simpson, G.B. & Foster, M.R. (1986). Lexical ambiguity and children's word recognition. Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 147-154.
52. Simpson, G.B. & Lorsbach, T.C. (1983). The development of automatic and conscious components of contextual facilitation. Child Development, 54, 760-772.
53. Simpson, G.B. & Lorsbach, T.C. (1987). Automatic and conscious context effects in average and advanced readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 10, 102-112.
54. Simpson, G.B., Lorsbach, T.C. & Whitehouse, D. (1983). Encoding and contextual components of word recognition in good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 161-171.
55. Smith, M.C. & Besner, D. (2001). Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 111-117.
56. Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F. & Feeman, D.J. (1981). A longitudinal study of sentence context effects in second-grade children: Test of an interactive-compensatory model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 185-199.
57. Stolz, J.A. & Neely, J.H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 596-611.
58. Stone, G.O., Vanhoy, M. & Van Orden, G.C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
59. Van Orden, G.C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181-198.
60. Van Orden, G.C. & Goldinger, S.D. (1994). The interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
61. Van Orden, G.C., Johnston, J.C. & Hale, B.L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371-386.
62. West, R.F. & Stanovich, K.E. (1978). Automatic contextual facilitation in readers of three ages. Child Development, 49, 717-727.
63. Wike, E.L. & Church, J.D. (1976). Comments on Clark's The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy'. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 249-255.
64. Ziegler, J.C. & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 683-689.
65. Ziegler, J.C., Montant, M. & Jacobs, A.M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 547-559.