Comment on "revealing differences in willingness to pay due to the dimensionality of stated choice designs: An initial assessment"

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 45-50

  Johnson, F Reed ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice experiments; Experimental design; Stated preference; Stated choice methods; Transportation economics

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; LOGIC DESIGN; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL METHODS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; STATED PREFERENCE; STATED-CHOICE METHODS; TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS;

DATA PROCESSING;

WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 33645539339     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-005-3783-x     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. T. Arentze A. Borgers R. DelMistro H. Timmermans 2003 'Transport Stated Choice Responses: Effects of Task Complexity, Presentation Format and Literacy' Transport Research E 39 229 244
2. M. Ben-Akiva T. Morikawa F. Shiroishi 1992 'Analysis of the Reliability of Preference Ranking Data' Journal of Business Research 24 149 164
3. R. Blamey J. Bennett J. Louviere M. Morrison J. Rolfe 2000 'A Test of Policy Labels in Environmental Choice Modeling Studies' Ecological Economics 32 269 286
4. K. J. Boyle T. P. Holmes M. F. Teisl B. Roe 2001 'Comparison of Conjoint Analysis Response Formats' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 2 441 454
5. S. Bryan L. Gold R. Sheldon M. Buxton 2000 'Preference Measurement Using Conjoint Methods: An Empirical Investigation of Reliability' Health Economics 9 385 395
6. R. Y. Darmon D. Rouziès 1991 'Internal Validity Assessment of Conjoint Estimated Attribute Importance Weights' Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science 19 315 322
7. W. Kuhfeld 2004 Marketing Research Methods in SAS, TS-694 SAS Institute Carey, North Carolina
8. J. J. Louviere 2001 'What If Consumer Experiments Impact Variances as Well as Means: Response Variability as a Behavioral Phenomenon' Journal of Consumer Research 28 506 511
9. J. J. Louviere D. J. Street L. Burgess 2003 A 20+ Years Retrospective on Choice Experiments Wind Yoram E. Green Paul Marketing Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects Kluwer Academic Publishers New York
10. J. Louviere D. Street R. Carson A. Ainslie J. DeShazo T. Cameron D. Hensher R. Kohn T. Marley 2002 'Dissecting the Random Component of Utility' Marketing Letters 13 177 193
11. J. Louviere D. Hensher J. Swait 2002 Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
12. T. Maddala K. A. Phillips F. R. Johnson 2003 'An Experiment on Simplifying Conjoint Analysis Exercises for Measuring HIV Testing Preferences' Health Economics 12 12 1035 1047
13. I. Simonson A. Tversky 1992 'Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion' Journal of Marketing Research 29 4 281 296
14. P. Slovic 1995 'The Construction of Preference' American Psychologist 50 364 371
15. J. -B. E. M. Steenkamp D. R. Wittink 1994 'The Metric Quality of Full-Profile Judgments and the Number-of-Attribute-Levels Effect in Conjoint Analysis' International Journal of Research in Marketing 11 275 286
16. Train, K. and G. Sonnier (2004), 'Mixed Logit with Bounded Distributions of Partworths, Forthcoming', in A. Alberini and R. Scarpa eds., Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics. Kluwer Academic Publisher
17. D. Wand L. Jiuqun H. Timmermans 2001 'Reducing Respondent Burden, Information Processing Effort, and Incomprehensibility in Stated Preference Surveys: Principles and Properties of Paired Conjoint Analysis' Transportation Research Record 1768 71 78
18. White, P. J., R. D. Johnson and J. J. Louviere (1998), The Effect of Attribute Range and Variance on Weighted Estimates. Department of Marketing, The University of Sydney (unpublished paper)