Modeling exposures for DNA methylation profiles

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 567-572

  Siegmund, Kimberly D ^a   Levine, A Joan ^a   Chang, Jing ^a   Laird, Peter W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; CPG ISLAND; DNA METHYLATION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIMULATION;

ADENOMA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DNA METHYLATION; DNA, NEOPLASM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 33645498308     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0717     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000;403:503-11.
2. Shi T, Seligson D, Belldegrun AS, et al. Tumor classification by tissue microarray profiling: random forest clustering applied to renal cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2005;18:547-57.
3. Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:8681-6.
4. Siegmund KD, Laird PW, Laird-Offringa IA. A comparison of cluster analysis methods using DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics 2004;20:1896-904.
5. Yeung KY, Fraley C, Murua A, et al. Model-based clustering and data transformations for gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2001;17:977-87.
6. McLachlan GJ, Bean RW, Peel D. A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data. Bioinformatics 2002;18:413-22.
7. McLachlan GJ, Change SU, Mar J, et al. On the simultaneous use of clinical and microarray expression data in the cluster analysis of tissue samples. In Y.P. Chen, editors. 2nd Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Conference (APBC2004): Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, vol. 29. Dunedin (New Zealand): the Australian Computer Society, Inc.; 2004. p. 167-71.
8. McLachlan GJ, Chang SU. Mixture modelling for cluster analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 2004;13:347-61.
9. Muthen B, Shedden K. Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics 1999;55:463-9.
10. Lin H, McCulloch CE, Turnbull BW, et al. A latent class mixed model for analysing biomarker trajectories with irregularly scheduled observations. Stat Med 2000;19:1303-18.
11. Lin H, Turnbull BW, McCulloch CE, et al. Latent class models for joint analysis of longitudinal biomarker and event process data: application to longitudinal PSA readings and prostate cancer. J Am Stat Assoc 2002;97:53-65.
12. Haile RW, Witte JS, Longnecker MP, et al. A sigmoidoscopy-based case-control study of polyps: macronutrients, fiber and meat consumption. Int J Cancer 1997;73:497-502.
13. Uhlmann K, Rohde K, Zeller C, et al. Distinct methylation profiles of glioma subtypes. Int J Cancer 2003;106:52-9.
14. Fraley C, Raftery AE. Mclust: software for model-based cluster analysis. Journal of Classification 1999;16:297-306.
15. SPLUS. http://www.insightful.coin/products/default.asp, version 6.1; 2002.
16. McLachlan GJ, Peel D, Basford KE, et al. The EMMIX software for the fitting of mixtures of normal and t-components. J Stat Software 1999;4:1-14.
17. Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 1995;90:773-95.
18. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J Roy Statist Soc Ser B 1977;39:1-38.
19. Louis TA. Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. J Roy Statist Soc Ser B 1982;44:226-33.
20. Virmani AK, Tsou JA, Siegmund KD, et al. Hierarchical clustering of lung cancer cell lines using DNA methylation markers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:291-7.
21. Shannon WD, Watson MA, Perry A, et al. Mantel statistics to correlate gene expression levels from microarrays with clinical covariates. Genet Epidemiol 2002;23:87-96.
22. Hubert L, Arabie P. Comparing Partitions. Journal of Classification 1985;2:193-218.