Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction in nascent ventures

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 389-399

  Foo, Maw Der ^a,c,d   Sin, Hock Peng ^b   Yiong, Lee Pen ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Nascent venture teams; New venture teams; Team inputs and processes; Top management teams

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

NASCENT VENTURE TEAMS; NEW VENTURE TEAMS; TEAM INPUTS AND PROCESSES; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33645403181     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.514     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Aiken LS, West SG. 1991. Multiple Regressions: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
2. Ancona DG, Caldwell DF. 1992. Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science 3: 321-341.
3. Audia PG, Locke EA, Smith KG. 2000. The paradox of success: an archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal 43: 837-853.
4. Bantel KA, Finkelstein S. 1991. The determinants of top management teams. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Miami.
5. Bantel KA, Jackson SE. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 10: 107-124.
6. Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK. 1998. Relating member ability and personality to work-intrateam processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 377-391.
7. Carter NM, Gartner WB, Reynolds PD. 1996. Exploring start-up event sequences. Journal of Business Venturing 11: 151-166.
8. Chatman JA, Flynn FJ. 2001. The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal 44: 956-974.
9. Churchill N, Lewis V. 1983. The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review 61(3): 30-50.
10. Druskat VU, Wolff SB. 1999. Effects and timing of developmental peer appraisals in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 84: 58-74.
11. Fair JL, Sin HP, Tesluk PE. 2003. Knowledge management processes and work group innovation. In International Handbook on Innovation, Shavinina LV (ed). Elsevier Science: Oxford, U.K.; 574-586.
12. Finkelstein S, Hambrick D. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and their Effects on Organizations. West: Minneapolis/St Paul, MN.
13. Foo MD, Wong PK, Ong A. 2005. Do others think you have a viable business idea? Team diversity and judges' evaluation of ideas in a business plan competition. Journal of Business Venturing 20: 385-402.
14. Hackman JR. 1988. Flight Crew Questionnaire. Cambridge, MA.
15. Hambrick DC, Cho TS, Chen MJ. 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 659-684.
16. Hambrick DC, Mason PA. 1984. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9: 193-206.
17. Harrison DA, Price KH, Bell MP. 1998. Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal 41: 96-107.
18. Harrison DA, Sin HP. 2005. What is diversity and how should it be measured? In Handbook of Workplace Diversity, Konrad A, Prasad P, Pringle J (eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 191-216.
19. Henry SM, Stevens KT. 1999. Using Belbin's leadership role to improve team effectiveness: an empirical investigation. Journal of Systems and Software 44: 241-250.
20. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. 1990. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
21. James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 69: 85-98.
22. Janis IL. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (2nd edn). Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA.
23. Kamm JB, Shuman JC, Seeger JA, Nurick AJ. 1990. New venture teams in new venture creation: a research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 14: 7-17.
24. Karakowsky L, Siegel JP. 1999. The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 84: 620-631.
25. Keh HT, Foo MD, Lim BC. 2002. Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: the cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27: 125-148.
26. Keller RT. 1992. Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management 18: 489-501.
27. Kennedy P. 1992. A Guide to Econometric Methods. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
28. Knight D, Pearce CL, Smith KG, Olian JD, Sims HP, Smith KA, Flood P. 1999. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal 20(5): 445-465.
29. Leung A, Wong P, Zhang JA, Foo MD. 2005. Multi-dimension of 'fit' and the use of networks in human resource acquisition for entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing (forthcoming).
30. Lowe K, Kroeck KG, Sivasubramaniam N. 1996. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic review. Leadership Quarterly 7: 385-425.
31. Mahmood I, Mitchell W. 2004. Two faces: effects of business groups on innovation in emerging economies. Management Science 50: 1348-1365.
32. Murnighan JK, Conlon DE. 1991. The dynamics of intense work groups: a study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 165-186.
33. O'Reilly CA, Caldwell DF, Barnett WP. 1989. Work group demography, social integration and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly 34: 21-37.
34. O'Reilly CA, Snyder RC, Boothe JN. 1993. Effects of executive team demography on organizational change. In Organizational Change and Redesign, Huber G, Click W (eds). Oxford University Press: New York; 147-175.
35. Pedhazur EJ, Schmelkin LP. 1991. Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
36. Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR. 1999. Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict and effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 1-28.
37. Perlow LA, Okhuysen GA, Repenning NP. 2002. The speed trap: exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Academy of Management Journal 45: 931-955.
38. Peterson RS. 1999. Can you have too much of a good thing? The limits of voice for improving satisfaction among leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25: 313-324.
39. Peterson RS, Owens PD, Tetlock PE, Fan ET, Martorana P. 1998. Group dynamics in top management teams: group think, vigilance, and alternative models of organizational failure and success. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73: 272-305.
40. Reynolds P, Hay M, Bygrave M, Camp SM, Autio E. 2000. Global Entrepreneur ship Monitor 2000. Executive Report. Kauffman Foundation: Kansas City, MO.
41. Roberts EB. 1991. Entrepreneur in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond. Oxford University Press: New York.
42. Schultz B, Ketrow SM, Urban DM. 1995. Improving decision quality in the small group. Small Group Research 26: 521-541.
43. Shane SA, Foo MD. 1999. Institutional explanations for new franchisor mortality. Management Science 45: 142-159.
44. Simons T, Felled LH, Smith KA. 1999. Making use of difference: diversity, debate and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal 42: 662-673.
45. Smith KG, Smith AA, Olian JD, Sims HP Jr. 1994. Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 412-438.
46. Stewart GL, Barrick MR. 2000. Team structure and effectiveness: assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal 43: 135-148.
47. Stokes JP. 1983. Components of group cohesion: intermember attraction, instrumental value and risk taking. Small Group Behavior 14: 163-173.
48. Taber TD, Taylor E. 1990. A review and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the job diagnostic survey. Personnel Psychology 43: 467-500.
49. Tsui AS, Egan TD, Xin KR. 1995. Diversity in organizations: lessons from demography research. In Diversity in Organizations: New Perspectives for a Changing Workplace, Chemers MM, Oskamp S, Costanzo MA (eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 191-219.
50. Turner ME, Pratkanis AR. 1998. A social identity maintenance model of groupthink. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73: 210-235.
51. Welbourne TM, Cyr LA. 1999. The human resource executive effect in initial public offering firms. Academy of Management Journal 42: 616-629.
52. Wiersema MP, Bantel KA. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal 35: 91-121.
53. Williams KY, O'Reilly CA. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20, Staw BM, Sutton RM (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 77-140.