Unintentional genetic processes in artificially maintained populations: Proving the leading role of selection in evolution

Russian Journal of Genetics

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 234-246

  Artamonova, V S ^a   Makhrov, A A ^a  

^a VAVILOV INSTITUTE OF GENERAL GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645376721     PISSN: 10227954     EISSN: 16083369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1134/S1022795406030021     Document Type: Review

References (152)

1. Altukhov, Yu.P., Geneticheskie protsessy v populyatsiyakh (Genetic Processes in Populations), Moscow: Akademkniga, 2003, 3rd ed.
2. Mayr, E., Populations, Species, and Evolution, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard Univ. Press, 1970.
3. Hedrick, P.W., Genetics of Populations, Sudbary: Jones and Bartlett, 1999.
4. Konovalov, S.M., Subisolate As a Relatively Rigid System: Function of a Subisolate, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1975, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 731-743.
5. Darwin, C., The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, London: Murray, 1868.
6. Pechurkin, N.S., Bril'kov, A.V., and Marchenkova, T.V., Populyatsionnye aspekty biotekhnologii (Population Aspects of Biotechnology), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990.
7. Nikonorov, S.I., Ofitserov, M.V., Vitvitskaya, L.V., and Loenko, A.A., Uncontrollable Genetic Selection in Salmons, Rybn. Khoz., 1989, no. 1, pp. 54-55.
8. Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., and Briscoe, D.A., Introduction to Conservation Genetics, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002.
9. Agaev, M.G., Eksperimental'naya evolyutsiya (na primere model'nykh populyatsii avtogamnykh rastenii) (Experimental Evolution (Exemplified by Model Populations of Autogamous Plants)), Leningrad: Leningr. Gos. Univ., 1978.
10. Kimura, M., The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983.
11. Nei, M., Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1987.
12. Nei, M. and Kumar, S., Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
13. Atchley, W.R. and Fitch, W.R., Gene Trees and the Origins of Inbred Strains of Mice, Science, 1991, vol. 254, no. 5031, pp. 554-558.
14. Bull, J.J., Cunningham, C.W., Molineux, I.J., et al., Experimental Molecular Evolution of Bacteriophage T7, Evolution, 1993, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 993-1007.
15. Oakley, T.H. and Cunningham, C.W., Independent Contrasts Succeed Where Ancestor Reconstruction Fails in a Known Bacteriophage Phylogeny, Evolution, 2000, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 397-405.
16. Cunningham, C.W., Zhu, H., and Hillis, D.M., Best-Fit Maximum-Likelihood Models for Phylogenetic Inference: Empirical Tests with Known Phylogenies, Evolution, 1998, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 978-987.
17. Glazko, V.I., Changes in Genetic Distances during Breed Development, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1987, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 389-397.
18. Rails, K. and Ballou, J., Extinction: Lessons from Zoos, Genetics and Conservation, Sconewald-Cox, C.M., Chambers, S.M., MacBryde, B., and Thomas, W.L., Eds., Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings, 1983, pp. 164-184.
19. Laikre, L., Hereditary Defects and Conservation Genetic Management of Captive Populations, Zoo Biol., 1999. vol. 18, pp. 81-99.
20. Hedrick, P.W. and Kalinowski, S.T., Inbreeding Depression in Conservation Biology, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 2000, vol. 31, pp. 139-162.
21. Reed, D.H., Lowe, E.H., Briscoe, D.A., and Frankham, R., Fitness and Adaptation in a Novel Environment: Effect of Inbreeding, Prior Environment, and Lineage, Evolution, 2003, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1822-1828.
22. Crnokrak, P. and Barrett, S.C.H., Purging the Genetic Load: A Review of the Experimental Evidence, Evolution, 2002, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 2347-2358.
23. Wang, S., Hard, J.J., and Utter, F., Salmonid Inbreeding: A Review, Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries, 2002, vol. 11, pp. 301-319.
24. Hugnes, K.A. and Sawby, R., Genetic Variability and Life-History Evolution, Evolutionary Conservation Biology, Ferriere, R., Dieckmann, U., and Couvet, D., Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004, pp. 119-135.
25. Zeyl, C., Mizesko, M., and de Visser, J.A.G.M., Mutational Meltdown in Laboratory Yeast Populations, Evolution, 2001, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 909-917.
26. Poon, A. and Chao, L., Drift Increases the Advantage of Sex in RNA Bacteriofage Φ6, Genetics, 2004, vol. 166, pp. 19-24.
27. Shilov, I.A., Population Homeostasis, Zool. Zh., 2002, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 1029-1047.
28. Vasilyeva, L.A., Ratner, V.A., and Bubenshchikova, E.V., Stress Induction of Retrotransposon Transpositions in Drosophila: Reality of the Phenomenon, Characteristics Features, and Possible Role in Rapid Evolution, Rus. J. Genet., 1997, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 918-927.
29. Merila, J., Sheldon, B.C., and Kruuk, L.E.B., Explaining Stasis: Microevolutionary Studies in Natural Populations, Genetics, 2001, vols. 112-113, pp. 199-222.
30. Dinamika populyatsionnykh genofondov pri antropogennykh vozdeistviyakh (Dynamics of Population Gene Pools under Anthropogenic Influence), Altukhov, Yu.P., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 2004.
31. Frankham, R., Inbreeding and Extinction: Island Populations, Cons. Biol., 1998, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 665-675.
32. Frankham, R., Lees, K., Montgomery, M.E., et al., Do Population Size Bottlenecks Reduce Evolutionary Potential?, Anim. Conservation, 1999, vol. 2, pp. 255-260.
33. Whitlock, M.C., Phillips, P.C., and Fowler, K., Persistence of Changes in the Genetic Covariance Matrix after a Bottleneck, Evolution, 2002, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1968-1975.
34. Shvarts, S.S., Pokrovskii, A.V., and Ovchinnikova, N.A., Experimental Analysis of the Founder Principle, Trudy Inst. Biol. Ural'sk. Filiala Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1966, no. 51, pp. 29-33.
35. Carson, H.L., Increased Genetic Variance after a Population Bottleneck, Trends Ecol. Evol., 1990, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 228-230.
36. Meffert, L.M., How Speciation Experiments Relate to Conservation Biology, BioScince, 1999, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 701-711.
37. Hoenigsberg, H.F. and Santibanez, S.K., Courtship and Sensory Preferences in Inbred Lines of Drosophila melanogaster, Evolution, 1960, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-7.
38. Carson, H.L. and Templeton, A.R., Genetic Revolutions in Relation to Speciation Phenomena: The Founding of New Populations, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1984, vol. 15, pp. 97-131.
39. Ringo, J., Wood, D., Rockwell, R., and Dowse, H., An Experiment Testing Two Hypotheses of Speciation, Am. Nat., 1985, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 642-661.
40. Barton, N.H. and Charlesworth, B., Genetic Revolutions, Founder Effects, and Speciation, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1984, vol. 15, pp. 133-164.
41. Rice, W.R. and Hostert, E.E., Laboratory Experiments on Speciation: What Have We Learned in 40 Years?, Evolution, 1993, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1637-1653.
42. Florin, A.-B. and Odeen, A., Laboratory Environments Are Not Conducive for Allopatric Speciation, J. Evol. Biol., 2002, vol. 15, pp. 10-19.
43. Arnold, M.L. and Burke, J.M., Natural Hybridization, Evolutionary Genetics: Concepts and Case Studies, Fox, C.W. and Wolf, J.B., Eds., Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2005.
44. Vuorinen, J. and Piironen, J., Electrophoretic Identification of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar), Brown Trout (S. trutta), and Their Hybrids, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1984, vol. 41, pp. 1834-1837.
45. Semenova, S.K. and Slyn'ko, V.I., Protein Polymorphism in Populations of Atlantic Trout Salmo salar L., Brown Trout S. trutta L.) and Their Hybrids, Genetika (Moscow), 1988, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 548-555.
46. Makhrov, A.A., Artamonova, V.S., Christoforov, O.L., et al., Hybridization between Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar L. and Brown Trout S. trutta L. upon Artificial Propagation, Rus. J. Genet., 2004, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1258-1263.
47. Ayllon, F., Martinez, J.L., Davaine, P., et al., Interspecific Hybridization between Atlantic Salmon and Brown Trout Introduced in the Subantarctic Kerguelen Islands, Aquaculture, 2004, vol. 230, pp. 81-88.
48. Flajshans, M. and Vajcova, V., Odd Ploidy Levels in Sturgeons Suggest a Backcross of Interspecific Hexaploid Sturgeon Hybrids to Evolutionarily Tetraploid and/or Octaploid Parental Species, Folia Zool., 2000, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 133-138.
49. Bartley, D.M., Rana, K., and Immink, A.J., The Use of Inter-Specific Hybrids in Aquaculture and Fisheries, Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries, 2001, vol. 10, pp. 325-337.
50. Schreiber, A., Wang, M., and Kaumanns, W., Captive Breeding of Squirrel Monkeys, Saimiri sciureus and Saimiri boliviensis: The Problem of Hybrid Groups, Zoo Biol., 1998, vol. 17, pp. 95-109.
51. Sakai, K.-I., Competition in Plants and Its Relation to Selection, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 1955, vol. 20, pp. 137-157.
52. Higgie, M., Chenoweth, S., and Blows, M.W., Natural Selection and the Reinforcement of Mate Recognition, Science, 2000, vol. 290, no. 5491, pp. 519-521.
53. Lewis, H., Experimental Sympatric Populations of Clarkia, Am. Nat., 1961, vol. 95, no. 882, pp. 155-168.
54. Frankham, R., Hemmer, H., Ryder, O.A., et al., Selection in Captive Populations, Zoo Biol., 1986, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 127-138.
55. Shvarts, S.S., Ekologicheskie zakonomernosti evolyutsii (Ecological Regularities in Evolution), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.
56. Kreslavskii, A.G., Nonrandom Migration: Consequences for the Variation of Quantitative Traits, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1987, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 602-613.
57. Margan, S.H., Nurthen, R.K., Montgomery, M.E., et al., Single Large or Several Small? Population Fragmentation in the Captive Management of Endangered Species, Zoo Biol., 1998, vol. 17, pp. 467-480.
58. Woodworth, L.M., Montgomery, M.E., Briscoe, D.A., and Frankham, R., Rapid Genetic Deterioration in Captive Populations: Causes and Conservation Implications, Cons. Genet., 2002, vol. 3, pp. 277-288.
59. Mirales, R., Moya, A., and Elena, S.F., Effects of Population Patchiness and Migration Rates on the Adaptation and Divergence of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Quasispecies Populations, J. Gen. Virol., 1999, vol. 80, pp. 2051-2059.
60. Cuevas, J.M., Moya, A., and Elena, S.F., Evolution of RNA Virus in Spatially Structured Heterogeneous Environments, J. Evol. Biol., 2003, vol. 16, pp. 456-466.
61. Templeton, A.R., Coadaptation and Outbreeding Depression, Conservation Biology: The Sciences of Scarcity and Diversity, Soule, M.E., Ed., Sunderland: Sinauer, 1986, pp. 105-116.
62. Nazarov, V.I., Importance of J. Tessier's Studies for the Development of the Synthetic Theory of Evolution, in Problemy noveishei istorii evolyutsionnogo ucheniya (Problems of the Contemporary History of the Theory of Evolution), Leningrad, 1981, pp. 136-147.
63. Dubinin, N.P., Evolyutsiya populyatsii i radiatsiya (Population Evolution and Radiation), Moscow: Atomizdat, 1966.
64. Gershenzon, S.M., "Mobilization Reserve" of Intraspecific Variation, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1941, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 85-107.
65. Huxley, J., Evolution: The Modern Synthesis, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1943.
66. Schmalhausen, I.I., Faktory evolyutsii (Factors of Evolution), Moscow: Nauka, 1968.
67. Kreslavskii, A.G., Novel View of the Adaptive Character of Polymorphism: A Concept of Pseudoneutral Mutations, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1993, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 645-658.
68. Radman, M., Matic, I., and Taddei, F., Evolution of Evolvability, Molecular Strategies in Biological Evolution, Caporale, L.H., Ed., New York: N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1999, pp. 146-155.
69. Hall, B.G., Adaptive Mutagenesis: A Process That Generates Almost Exclusively Beneficial Mutations, Genetics, 1998, vols. 102-103, pp. 109-125.
70. Kallis, Kh.A., Environment as a Generator of Adaptive Changes, in Sovremennye kontseptsii evolyutsionnoi genetiki (Modern Concepts of Evolutionary Genetics), Novosibirsk, 2000, pp. 168-174.
71. Grishaeva, T.M. and Ivashchenko, N.I., Problems of Structural-Functional Interactions in Hybrid Dysgenesis Systems, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 1997, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 52-67.
72. Belyaeva, E.Sp., Pasyukova, E.G., and Gvozdev, V.A., Adaptive Transpositions of Retrotransposons Accompanied by Fitness Changes in the Drosophila melanogaster Genome, Rus. J. Genet., 1994, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 641-645.
73. Hartl, D.L., Dykhuizen, D.E., Miller, R.D., et al., Transposable Element IS50R Improves Growth Rate of E. coli without Transposition, Cell (Cambridge, Mass.), 1983, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 503-510.
74. Adams, J., Microbial Evolution in Laboratory Environment, Res. Microbiol., 2004, vol. 155, pp. 311-318.
75. Elena, S.F. and Lenski, R.E., Evolution Experiments with Microorganisms: The Dynamics and Genetic Bases of Adaptation, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2003, vol. 4, pp. 457-469.
76. Cutter, A.D., Mutation and the Experimental Evolution of Outcrossing in Caenorhabditis elegans, J. Evol. Biol., 2005, vol. 18, pp. 27-34.
77. Zeyl, C. and Bell, G., The Advantage of Sex in Evolving Yeast Populations, Nature, 1997, vol. 388, no. 6641, pp. 465-468.
78. Tsilinskii, Ya.Ya. and L'vov, D.K., Populyatsionnaya genetika virusov pozvonochnykh (Population Genetics of Vertebrate Viruses), Moscow: Meditsina, 1977.
79. Lukashenko, N.P. and Rybakova, Z.I., Genetika infuzorii (Infusorium Genetics), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.
80. Rapoport, I.A., Geny, evolyutsiya, selektsiya (Genes, Evolution, Breeding), Moscow: Nauka, 1996.
81. Rozhkov, Yu.I. and Pronyaev, A.V., Mikroevolyutsionnyi protsess (Microevolutionary Process), Moscow: Tsentr. Lab. Okhot. Khoz. i Zapoved., 1994.
82. Altukhov, Yu.P., Mezhzherin, S.V., Salmenkova, E.A., and Omel'chenko, V.T., Effect of Selective Fish Farming on the Adaptive Genetic and Biological Structures of Pink Salmon Oncorhynchus gorbuscha (Walb.), Genetika (Moscow), 1989, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1843-1853.
83. McLean, J.E., Bentsen, P., and Quinn, T.P., Nonrandom, Size- and Timing-Biased Breeding in a Hatchery Population of Steelhead Trout, Cons. Biol., 2005, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 446-454.
84. Shabalina, S.A., Yampolsky, L.Y., and Kondrashov, A.S., Rapid Decline of Fitness in Panmictic Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Maintained under Relaxed Natural Selection, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, vol. 94, pp. 13 034-13 039.
85. Hoffmann, A.A., Hallas, R., Sinclair, C., and Partridge, L., Rapid Loss of Stress Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster under Adaptation to Laboratory Culture, Evolution, 2001, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 436-438.
86. Carson, H.L., Chang, L.S., and Lyttle, T.W., Decay of Female Sexual Behavior under Parthenogenesis, Science, 1982, vol. 218, no. 4567, pp. 68-70.
87. Lima, J.B.P., Valle, D., and Peixoto, A.A., Adaptation of a South American Malaria Vector to Laboratory Colonization Suggests Faster-Male Evolution for Mating Ability, BMC Evol. Biol., 2004, vol. 4, no. 2 (www.biomedcentral.com/bmcevolbiol/).
88. Ajie, B.C., Estes, S., Lynch, M., and Phillips, P.C., Behavioral Degradation under Mutation Accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 2005, vol. 170, pp. 655-660.
89. Lenski, R.E., Phenotypic and Genomic Evolution during a 20 000-Generation Experiment with the Bacterium Escherichia coli, Plant Breed. Rev., 2004, vol. 24, part 2, pp. 225-265.
90. Behr, M.A., Wilson, M.A., Gill, W.P., et al., Comparative Genomics of BCG Vaccines by Whole-Genome DNA Microarray, Science, 1999, vol. 284, pp. 1520-1523.
91. Khlebovich, V.V., The Susceptibility to Loss of Diapause Capacity in Hydrobionts of Ephemeral Water-bodies, Hydrobiologia, 1996, vol. 320, pp. 83-84.
92. Pristavko, V.P., Olfactory Sensitivity As a Criterion of the Viability of Insect Cultures, Pervoe Vses. soveshch. po problemam zookul'tury. Tez. dokl. (Proc. 1st All-Union Conf. on Problems of Zooculture), Moscow, 1986, part 3, pp. 240-241.
93. Bradley, B.P., Developmental Stability of Drosophila melanogaster under Artificial and Natural Selection in Constant and Fluctuating Environments, Genetics, 1980, vol. 95, pp. 1033-1042.
94. Imasheva, A.G., Kholodenko, D.B., and Zhivotovsky, L.A., Decrease in Variation of Wing Traits in Laboratory Populations of Drosophila melanogaster, Genetika (Moscow), 1986, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 2291-2294.
95. Carson, H.L., Genetic Conditions Which Promote or Retard the Formation of Species, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 1959, vol. 24, pp. 87-105.
96. Mitton, J.B., Selection in Natural Populations, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997.
97. Zhivotovsky, L.A., Integratsiya poligennykh sistem v populyatsiyakh (Integration of Polygenic Systems in Populations), Moscow: Nauka, 1984.
98. Luchnikova, E.M., Microevolutinary Role of Frequency-Dependent Selection and Ecological Prerequisites to Its Origin, in Problemy noveishei istorii evolyutsionnogo ucheniya (Problems of the Contemporary History of the Theory of Evolution), Leningrad, 1981, pp. 95-114.
99. Grechanyi, G.V., Nikitin, A.Ya., Korzun, V.M., and Sosunova, I.A., Ekologo-geneticheskaya determinatsiya dinamiki chislennosti populyatsii (Ecological Genetic Determination of the Dynamics of Population Size), Irkutsk: Irkutsk. Gos. Univ., 2004.
100. MacLean, R.C., Adaptive Radiation in Microbial Microcosms, J. Evol. Biol., 2005, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1376-1386.
101. Ermakova, N.I. and Efimov, V.M., Cyclic Changes in the State of a Laboratory Population of Beet Webworm Loxostege sticticalis L. (Insecta), Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1995, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 380-390.
102. Holland, J., Spindler, K., Hododyski, F., et al., Rapid Evolution of RNA Genomes, Science, 1982, vol. 215, no. 4540, pp. 1577-1585.
103. Korona, R., Genetic Divergence and Fitness Convergence under Uniform Selection in Experimental Populations of Bacteria, Genetics, 1996, vol. 143, pp. 637-644.
104. Allard, R.W., Genetic Changes Associated with the Evolution of Adaptedness in Cultivated Plants and Their Wild Progenitors, J. Hered., 1988, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 225-238.
105. Ellerstrom, S. and Hagberg, A., Competition between Diploids and Tetraploids in Mixed Rye Populations, Hereditas (Lund, Swed.), 1954, vol. 40, nos. 3-4, pp. 535-537.
106. Jeon, K.W., Development of Cellular Dependence on Infective Organisms: Micrurgical Studies in Amoebas, Science, 1972, vol. 176, no. 4093, pp. 1122-1123.
107. Stewart, A.D. and Phillips, P.C., Selection and Maintenance of Androdioecy in Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 2002, vol. 160, pp. 975-982.
108. Gilligan, D.M. and Frankham, R., Dynamics of Genetic Adaptation to Captivity, Cons. Genet., 2003, vol. 4, pp. 189-197.
109. Matos, M., Avelar, T., and Rose, M.R., Variation in the Rate of Convergent Evolution: Adaptation to a Laboratory Environment in Drosophila subobscura, J. Evol. Biol., 2002, vol. 15, pp. 673-682.
110. Pascual, M., Constanti, M., Ribo, G., and Prevosti, A., Genetic Changes in Mating Activity in Laboratory Strains of Drosophila subobscura, Genetics, 1990, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 39-43.
111. Ayala, F.J., Evolution of Fitness: II. Correlated Effects of Natural Selection on the Productivity and Size of Experimental Populations of Drosophila serrata, Evolution, 1968, vol. 22, pp. 55-65.
112. Bush, G.L., Genetic Variation in Natural Insect Populations and Its Bearing on Mass-Rearing Programmes, in Controlling Fruit Flies by the Sterile-Insect Technique, Vienna, 1975, pp. 9-17.
113. Nazarova, A.V. and Kreslavskii, A.G., Genetic Difference in the Response to Population Density between Poecilia reticulata from an Aquarium Culture and a Population from the Moskva River, Vopr. Ikhtiol., 1998, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 73-80.
114. Artamonova, V.S., Makhrov, A.A., and Kholod, O.N., Uncontrolled Selection in Brood Stocks of Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar L., Lososevidnye ryby Vostochnoi Fennoskandii (Salmonids of Eastern Fennoscandia), Petrozavodsk, 2005 (in press).
115. Heath, D.D., Heath, J.W., Bryden, C.A., et al., Rapid Evolution of Egg Size in Captive Salmon, Science, 2003, vol. 299, pp. 1738-1740.
116. Fleming, I.A., Einum, S., Jonsson, B., and Jonsson, N., Comment on "Rapid Evolution of Egg Size in Captive Salmon", Science, 2003, vol. 302, p. 59.
117. Reisenbichler, R.R., Uncertainty and Research Needs for Supplementing Wild Populations of Anadromous Pacific Salmon, Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 2004, vol. 44, pp. 263-275.
118. Leopold, A.S., The Nature of Heritable Wildness in Turkeys, Condor, 1944, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 133-197.
119. Kuznetsova, I.A., True Lemmings (Genus Lemmus) As a Model for Studying Adaptation to Arctic Conditions, Pervoe Vses. soveshch. po problemam zookul'tury. Tez. dokl. (Proc. 1st All-Union Conf. on Problems of Zooculture), Moscow, 1986, part 2, pp. 216-218.
120. Belyaev, D.K. and Borodin, P.M., Effect of Stress on Hereditary Variation and Its Evolutionary Role, in Evolyutsionnaya genetika (Evolutionary Genetics), Leningrad, 1982, pp. 35-59.
121. Price, E.O., Behavioral Aspects of Animal Domestication, Q. Rev. Biol., 1984, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1-32.
122. Trapezov, O.V., Domestication As a Possible Mode of Biodeiversity Conservation (Through the Example of River Otter Lutra lutra L., 1758), Rus. J. Genet., 1997, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 990-994.
123. Vavilov, N.I., Global Resources of Frost-Resistant Cultivars of Winter Wheat, Rye, and Barley, in Vavilov, N.I., Teoreticheskie osnovy selektsii (Theoretical Basis of Breeding), Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 80-86.
124. Tsinger, N.V., On Camelina and Spergula Species Growing on Flax Fields, Tr. Bot. Muzeva Imp. Akad. Nauk, 1909, no. 6, pp. 1-303.
125. Estes, S. and Lynch, M., Rapid Fitness Recovery in Mutationally Degraded Lines of Caenorhabditis elegans, Evolution, 2003, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1022-1030.
126. Haldane, J.B.S., The Cost of Natural Selection, J. Genet., 1957, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 509-515.
127. Severtsov, A.S., On the Causes of Evolutionary Stasis, Zool. Zh., 2004, vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 927-935.
128. Holland, B. and Rice, W.R., Experimental Removal of Sexual Selection Reverses Intersexual Antagonistic Coevolution and Removes a Reproductive Load, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, vol. 96, pp. 5083-5088.
129. Lyttle, T.W., Segregation Distorters, Annu. Rev. Genet., 1991, vol. 25, pp. 511-557.
130. Tsinger, N., Alectorolophus major Rchnb. Subspecies of Regions Affected by Crops and Their Origin via Natural Selection, Tr. Tiflissk. Bot. Sada, 1913, issue 12, book 2, pp. 179-190.
131. Bradshaw, A.D., Genostasis and the Limits of Evolution, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, B, 1991, vol. 333, no. 1267, pp. 289-305.
132. Sgro, C.M. and Partridge, L., Evolutionary Responses of the Life History of Wild-Caught Drosophila melanogaster to Two Standard Methods of Laboratory Culture, Am. Nat., 2000, vol. 156, no. 4, pp. 341-353.
133. Raushenbakh, Yu.O., Regularities in Ecogenesis of Domestic Animals, Genetika (Moscow), 1981, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1663-1676.
134. Kassen, R., The Experimental Evolution of Specialists, Generalists, and the Maintenance of Diversity, J. Evol. Biol., 2002, vol. 15, pp. 173-190.
135. Ritter, J.A., Lower Ocean Survival Rates for Hatchery-Reared Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Stocks Released in Rivers Other Than Their Native Streams, ICES, 1975, M:26.
136. Reisenbichler, R.R., Relation between Distance Transferred from Natal Stream and Recovery Rate for Hatchery Coho Salmon, North Am. J. Fish. Man., 1988, vol. 8, pp. 172-174.
137. Salmenkova, E.A., Altukhov, Yu.P., Viktorovskii, R.M., et al., Genetic Structure of Calico Salmon Populations Spawning in Rivers of the Russian Far East and North-eastern Soviet Union, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1986, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 529-549.
138. Kirpichnikov, V.S., Adaptive Significance of Biochemical Polymorphism of Populations, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1987, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 3-14.
139. Golubtsov, A.S., Vnutripopulyatsionnaya izmenchivost' zhivotnykh i belkovyi polimorfizm (Intrapopulation Variation of Animals and Protein Polymorphism), Moscow: Nauka, 1988.
140. Krutovskii, K.V., Modern Approaches to Studies of the Effect of Selection on Enzyme Loci, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 1988, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 323-339.
141. Britten, H.B., Meta-Analyses of the Association between Multilocus Heterozygosity and Fitness, Evolution, 1996, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 2158-2164.
142. Watt, W.B. and Dean, A.M., Molecular-Functional Studies of Adaptive Genetic Variation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes, Annu. Rev. Genet., 2000, vol. 34, pp. 593-622.
143. Dubrova, Yu.E., Salmenkova, E.A., Altukhov, Yu.P., et al., The Influence of Parental Heterozygosity on Interfamily Variation of the Progeny Body Length in Pink Salmon, Rus. J. Genet., 1994, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 365-371.
144. Varnavskaya, N.V., Principles of Genetic Identification of Pacific Salmon Populations of the Genus Oncorhynchus spp. in Connections with Problems of Their Rational Use, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Inst. Gen. Genet., 2001.
145. Heath, D.D., Bryden, C.A., Shrimpton, J.M., et al., Relationships between Heterozygosity, Allelic Distance (d(2)), and Reproductive Traits in Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2002, vol. 59, pp. 77-84.
146. Primmer, C.R., Landry, P.-A., Ranta, E., et al., Prediction of Offspring Fitness Based on Parental Genetic Diversity in Endangered Salmonid Populations, J. Fish Biol., 2003, vol. 63, pp. 909-927.
147. Glazko, V.I. and Sozinov, I.A., Genetika izofermentov zhivotnykh i rastenii (Genetics of Animal and Plant Isozymes), Kiev: Urozhai, 1993.
148. Wichman, H.A., Millstein, J., and Bull, J.J., Adaptive Molecular Evolution for 13 000 Phage Generations: A Possible Arms Race, Genetics, 2005, vol. 170, pp. 19-31.
149. Mukai, T., Experimental Verification of the Neutral Theory, Population Genetics and Molecular Evolution, Ohta, T. and Aoki, K., Eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985, pp. 125-145.
150. Kartavtsev, Yu.F., Genetic Differentiation and Integration in Populations of Aquatic Animals, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Univ., 1995.
151. Darlington, C.D., The Evolution of Genetic Systems, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1958.
152. Lewontin, R.C., The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1974.