The influence of lens conditioning on signs and symptoms with new hydrogel contact lenses

Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 367-371

  Coles, M L Chantal ^a,c   Brennan, Noel A ^a   Shuley, Vicki ^a   Woods, Jill ^a   Prior, Chris ^a   Vehige, Joseph G ^b   Simmons, Peter A ^b  

^a Brennan Consultants Pty Ltd   (Australia)

^b ALLERGAN INC   (United States)

^c Consultants Pty Ltd ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

Carboxymethylcellulose; Contact lenses

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; EYE DROPS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; EYE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; LENS; MALE; PATHOLOGY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY;

ADULT; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; CONTACT LENSES; EYE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MALE; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 16644366035     PISSN: 08164622     EISSN: 14440938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2004.tb03096.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hamano H, Watanabe K, Hamano T, Mitsunaga S, Kotani S, Okada A. A study of the complications induced by conventional and disposable contact lenses. CLAO J 1994;20:103-108.
2. Nason RJ, Boshnick EL, Cannon WM, Dubow BW, Freeman MI, Kame RT, Lanier JC Jr, Lopanik RW, Quinn TG Jr, Rigel LE et al. Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in successful contact lens wearers. J Am Optom Assoc 1994;65:774-780.
3. Nilsson S, Söderqvist M. Clinical performance of a daily disposable contact lens: a 3-month prospective study. J Br Contact Lens Soc 1995;20:81-86.
4. Solomon OD, Freeman MI, Boshnick EL, Cannon WM, Dubow BW, Kame RT, Lanier JC Jr, Lopanik RW, Quinn TG Jr, Rigel LE, Sherrill DD, Stiegmeier MJ, Teiche RS, Zigler LG, Mertz GW, Nason RJ. A 3-year prospective study of the clinical performance of daily disposable contact lenses compared with frequent replacement and conventional daily wear contact lenses. CLAO J 1996;22:250-257.
5. Fowler S, Allansmith M. Evolution of soft contact lens coatings. Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:95-99.
6. Hart D, DePaolis M, Ratner B, Mateo N. Surface analysis of hydrogel contact lenses by ESCA. CLAO J 1993;19:169-173.
7. Leahy C, Mandell R, Lin S. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:504-511.
8. Lin ST, Mandell RB, Leahy CD, Newell JO. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1991;17:44-50.
9. Rask R, Jensen PK, Ehlers N. Epithelial healing in the second eye after corneal abrasion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:232-234.
10. Drubaix I, Legeais JM, Robert L, Renard G. Corneal hyaluronan content during post-ablation healing: evidence for a transient depth-dependent contralateral effect. Exp Eye Res 1997;64:301-304.
11. Fonn D, du Toit R, Simpson TL, Vega JA, Situ P, Chalmers JL. Sympathetic swelling response of the control eye to soft lenses in the other eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:3116-3121.
12. Estil S, Haaskjold E, Bjerknes R, Refsum SB. A previous abrasion in the contralateral eye influences the cell kinetics during healing of a central corneal abrasion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001;79:389-393.
13. Guzey M, Satici A, Kilic A, Karadede S. Oedematous corneal response of the fellow control eye to lotrafilcon a and vifilcon a hydrogel contact lenses in the rabbit. Ophthalmologica 2002;216:139-143.
14. Ladage PM, Ren DH, Petroll WM, Jester JV, Bergmanson JP, Cavanagh HD. Effects of eyelid closure and disposable and silicone hydrogel extended contact lens wear on rabbit corneal epithelial proliferation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1843-1849.
15. Papas EB, Vajdic CM. Inter-ocular characteristics of the pre-contact lens tear film. Curr Eye Res 2000;20:248-250.
16. Papas EB. The role of hypoxia in the limbal vascular response to soft contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S72-S74; discussion S83-S84, S192-S194.
17. Brennan NA, Efron N. Symptomatology of HEMA contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:834-838.
18. Bailey I, Bullimore M, Raasch T, Taylor H. Clinical grading and the effect of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:422-432.