Variation in X-ray dose quantity using an amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector - A study on the dose reduction rate up to the limit of diagnostical utilization;Dosisvariation mit einem direkten selen-flachbilddetektor - Eine studie zur dosisreduktion bis an die grenzen der diagnostischen verwertbarkeit

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 178, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 278-286

  Lehnert, Thomas ^a   Wohlers, J ^a   Streng, W ^b   Manegold, K ^c   Wetter, A ^a   Jacobi, V ^a   Mack, M G ^a   Vogl, T J ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Kodak GmbH   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Conventional radiography; Dose reduction; Flat panel detector; Image quality; Indications; Interpretations; Musculoskeletal system

Indexed keywords

SELENIUM;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; OPTICAL DENSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION DOSE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; X RAY FILM;

ADULT; BONE DISEASES; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REFERENCE VALUES; SELENIUM;

EID: 33644905264     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926536     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Schaefer-Prokop C, Uffmann M, Sailer J et al. Digitale Thoraxradiographie: Flat-panel-Detektor oder Speicherfolie. Radiologe 2003; 43: 351-361
2. Grampp S, Czerny C, Krestan C et al. Flat-screen detector systems in skeletal radiology. Radiologe 2003; 43: 362-366
3. Hamers S, Freyschmidt J, Neitzel U. Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs screen-film radiography observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1753-1759
4. Ludwig K, Lenzen H, Kamm KF et al. Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography. Radiology 2002; 222: 453-459
5. Okamura T, Tanaka S, Koyama K et al. Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1741-1747
6. Reissberg S, Hoeschen C, Kastner A et al. Erste klinische Erfahrungen mit einem grossformatigen Flächendetektorsystem bei Aufnahmen des peripheren Skelettsystems. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 353-356
7. Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Liu X et al. Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography system - a contrast-detail phantom study. Med Phys 2001; 28: 2328-2335
8. Murphey MD, Quale JL, Martin NL et al. Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art. AJR 1992; 158: 19-27
9. Peer S, Neitzel U, Giacomuzzi SM et al. Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20: 239-242
10. Krestan C, Grampp , Heiner L et al. Diagnostic quality of digital and conventional radiographs in the assessment of DJD at the spine and knee. Abstract book, 9th annual meeting. European Society of Musculoskeletal. Radiology 2002; 143
11. Strotzer M, Volk M, Wild T et al. Simulated bone erosion in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. Radiology 2000; 215: 512-515
12. Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Volk M et al. Clinical application of a flat panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography. AJR 1998; 171: 23-27
13. Peer S, Neitzel U, Giacomuzzi SM et al. Direct digital radiography versus storage phosphor radiology in detection of wrist fractures. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 258-262
14. Meier S, Mildenberger P, Oberholzer K et al. Experimentelle In-vitro-Studie zur Evaluierung eines elektronischen Detektors für die digitale Radiographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 875-879
15. Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C, Neitzel U et al. Skeletal applications for flat-panel versus storage-phosphor radiography: effect of exposure on detection of low-contrast details. Radiology 2004; 231: 506-514
16. Zahringer M, Krug B, Kamm KF et al. Detection of porcine bone lesions and fissures: comparing digital selenium, digital luminescence, and analog film-screen radiography. AJR 2001; 177: 1397-1403
17. Volk M, Strotzer M, Holzknecht N et al. Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 615-621
18. Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser JK, Spahn M et al. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, X-ray detector versus screen-film radiography. Effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone defects and fractures. Invest Radiol 1998; 33: 33-38
19. Reiff KJ. Flat panel detectors-closing the (digital) gap in chest and skeletal radiology. Eur J Radiol 1999; 31: 125-131
20. Volk M, Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J et al. Flat-panel X-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology: Reduced radiation dose fort he detection of foreign bodies. Invest Radiol 1997; 32: 373-377
21. Busch HP. Qualitäts- und Dosismanagement in der digitalen Projektionsradiographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 17-19
22. James JJ, Davies AG, Cowen AR et al. Developments in digital radiography: an equipment update. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 2616-2626
23. Strotzer M. Digital radiography with flat-panel detectors: the missing link. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1603-1604
24. Langen HL, Bielmeier J, Wittenberg G et al. Workflowverbesserung und Effizienzsteigerungsaspekte durch nahezu vollständige Digitalisierung einer Röntgenabteilung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 1309-1316