Digital thorax radiography: Flat-panel detector or storage phosphor plates;Digitale thoraxradiographie: Flat-panel-detektor oder speicherfolie?

Radiologe

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 351-361

  Schaefer Prokop, C ^a   Uffmann, M ^a   Sailer, J ^a   Kabalan, N ^a   Herold, C ^a   Prokop, M ^a  

^a UNIV KLIN FÜR RADIODIAGNOSTIK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Flat panel direct radiography; Storage phosphor plates; Thorax

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL OBSERVATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEVICE; DOSE RESPONSE; ECONOMICS; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXPERIENCE; FLAT PANEL DETECTOR; FLOW KINETICS; FREQUENCY MODULATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INTENSIVE CARE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NOISE REDUCTION; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STANDARD; STORAGE PHOSPHOR RADIOGRAPHY; TECHNOLOGY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ARTIFACTS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SILICON; TECHNOLOGY, RADIOLOGIC; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 0038118334     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-003-0893-8     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Schulz RF (2001) Digitale Detektorsysteme für die Projektionsradiographie. RÖFO 173:1137-1146
2. Kotter E, Langer M (2002) Digital radiography with large-area flat-panel detectors. Eur Radiology 12:2562-2570
3. Spahn M, Strotzer M, Völk M et al. (2000) Digital radiography with a large area, amorphous silicon flat-panel X-ray detector system. Invest Radiol 35:260-266
4. Floyd CE, Warp RJ, Dobbins JT et al. (2001) Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. Radiology 218:683-688
5. Chotas HG, Floyd Jr CE, Ravin CE (1995) Technical evaluation of a digital chest radiography system that uses a selenium detector. Radiology 195:264-270
6. Bath M, Sund P, Mansson LG (2002) Evaluation of the imaging properties of two generations of a CCD based system for digital chest radiography. Med Phys 29(10):2286-2297
7. Arakawa S, Itoh W, Kohda K, Suzuki T (1999) Novel computed radiography system with improved image quality by detection of emissions from both sides of an imaging plate. SPIE Medical Imaging, poster presentation
8. Liu X, Shaw CC (2001) Regional improvement of signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in dual-screen CR chest imaging - a phantom study. Med Phys 28(6):1080-1092
9. Leblans P, Struye L, Willems P et al. (2000) A new needle-crystalline computed radiography detector. J Digit Imag 13(2) [suppl 1]:117-120
10. Schaetzing R, Fasbender R, Kersten P (2002) New high-speed scanning techniquwe for computed radiography. SPIE 4682:511-520
11. Busch HP (2003) Qualitäts- und Dosismanagement in der digitalen Projektionsradiographie (Editorial). RÖFO 175:17-19
12. Siewerdsen JH, Antonuk LE, el-Mohri Y et al. (1998) Signal, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency of indirect detection flat panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. Med Phys 25(5):614-628
13. Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser JK, Volk M et al. (1998) Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon. Invest Radiol 33(2):98-103
14. Garmer M, Hennigs, SP, Jager HJ et al. (2000) Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large area silicon flat panel detector in a clinical CT controlled study. AJR 174(1):75-80
15. Hennigs SP, Garmer M, Jaeger HJ et al. (2001) Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography. Eur Radiol 11:1688-1696
16. Chotas H, Ravin CE (2001) Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat panel X-ray detector: contrast detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy. Radiology 218:679-682
17. Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Liu X et al. (2001) Comparison of anamorphous silicon/cesium iodide flatpanel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems - a contrast-detail phantom study. Med Phys 28(11):2328
18. Peer S, Neitzel U, Giacomuzzi SM et al. (2001) Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(3):239-242
19. Strotzer M, Völk M, Fründ R et al. (2002) Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction. AJR 178:169-171
20. Fink C, Hallscheidt PJ, Noeldge G et al. (2002) Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon and flat panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography. AJR 178:481-486
21. Hosch WP, Fink C, Radeleff B et al. (2002) Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector. Clin Radiol 57:902-907
22. Herrmann KA, Bonel H, Stäbler A et al. (2002) Chest imaging with flat-panel detector at low and standard doses: comparison with storage phosphor technology in normal patients. Eur Radiol 12:385-390
23. Loewe Grgurin M, Gruber M, Sailer J et al. (2002) Dosisreduktion in der Thoraxradiographie mit einem Flatpanel System. Röfo 174 [suppl]:S243
24. Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop CM et al. (2002) Impact of acquisition dose on the detection of subtle lung abnormalities with computed radiography and direct radiography: a phantom study. Radiology 225 [suppl]:382
25. Kim TS, Im JG, Goo JM et al. (2002) Detection of pulmonary edema in pigs: storage phosphor versus amorphous selenium-based flat-panel detector radiography. Radiology 223:695-701
26. Redlich U, Reissberg S, Hoeschen C et al. (2003) Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system. RÖFO 175(1):38-45
27. Flynn MJ, Samei E (1999) Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2 K and 4 K storage phosphor radiography systems. Med Phys 26(8):1612-1620
28. Schaefer-Prokop C, Prokop M, Nagel S, Ilg R, Lepert AG, Galanski M (1997) Impact of matrix size and exposure dose in storage phosphor chest radiography: results of an antropomorphic phantom study. Radiology 205(P):436
29. Miro SPM, Leung AN, Rubin GD et al. (2001) Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2 K versus 4 K matrix size on observer performance. Radiology 218:527-532
30. Strasser GD, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Boehm P et al. (2001) Impact of an increased matrix size on the performance of storage phosphor chest radiographs. Radiology 221 [suppl]:354
31. Launders JH, Cowen AR, Bury RF, Hawkridge P (2001) Towards image quality, beam energy and effective dose optimisation in digital radiography. Eur Radiol 11:870-875
32. Dencker E, Schaefer-Prokop C, Prokop M et al. (1997) Einfluß der Aufnahmespannung auf die Kontrastauflösung in der digitalen Thoraxradiographie. RÖFO 164 [suppl], abstr VO 299
33. Dobbins JT, Samei E, Chotas HG et al. (2003) Chest radiography: optimization of X-ray spectrum for cesium jodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. Radiology 226:221-230
34. Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Kabalan N et al. (2002) Impact of tube voltage on image quality in direct detector chest radiography. Radiology 225 [suppl]:383
35. May GA, Deer DD, Dackiewietz D et al. (2000) Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow. J Digit Imag 200(13) [suppl]:76-78
36. Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop CM (1997) Digital image processing. Eur Radiol [suppl 3]:73-82
37. Vuylsteke P, Schoeters E (1994) Multiscale image contrast amplification (MUSICA). SPIE Medical Imag Proc 2167:551-560
38. Stahl M, Aach T, Buzug TM, Dippel S, Neitzel U (1999) Noise-resistant weak-structure enhancement for digital radiography. Proc SPIE 3661:1406-1417
39. Stahl M, Aach T, Dippel S (2000) Digital radiography enhancement by non linear multiscale processing. Med Phys 27:56-65
40. Hoeppner S, Maack I, Neitzel U, Stahl M (2002) Equalized contrast display processing for digital radiography. Proc SPIE 4681:617-625
41. Dencker E, Stahl M, Dippels et al. (2000) Nonlinear multiscale processing in digital chest radiography: results of a patient study with simulated chest lesions. Eur Radiol 10 [suppl 2]:abstr 1319
42. Difazio MC, MacMahon H, Xu XW et al. (1997) Digital chest radiography: effect of temporal subtraction images on detection accuracy. Radiology 202:447-452
43. Kido S, Ikezoe J, Naito et al. (1995) Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise reduction algorithm. Radiology 194:407-412
44. Ricke J, Fischbach F, Teichgräber U et al. (2001) First experiences with a detector based dual energy system for thorax radiography. Eur Radiol 12 [suppl]:B0261
45. Tsubamato M, Johkoh T, Kozuka T et al. (2002) Temporal subtraction for the detection of hazy pulmonary opacities on chest radiography. AJR 179:467-471
46. Kakeda S, Nakamura K, Kamada K et al. (2002) Improved detection of lung nodules by using a temporal subtraction technique. Radiology 224:145-151