Equipoise: A case study of the views of clinicians involved in two neonatal trials

Clinical Trials

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 170-178

  Garcia, Jo ^a   Elbourne, Diana ^a   Snowdon, Claire ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEONATOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNCERTAINTY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEONATOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 33644901373     PISSN: 17407745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1740774504cn020xx     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Fried C. Medical experimentation: personal integrity and social policy. New York: American Elsevier, 1974.
2. Hellman S. Randomized clinical trials and the doctor-patient relationship: an ethical dilemma. Cancer Clin Trials 1979: 2: 189-193.
3. Schafer A. The ethics of the randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med 1982; 307, 719-724.
4. Zajicek G. Medical ethics - two codes of ethics in medicine. Cancer J 1995; 8: 5. URL - http://www.tribunes.com/tribune/edito/8-5z.htm. Last accessed 6 February 2004.
5. Bradford Hill A. Medical ethics and controlled trials. BMJ 1963; 2: 1043-1049.
6. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. New Engl J Med 1987; 317: 141-145.
7. Hellman S., Hellman D.S. Of mice but not men: problems of the randomized clinical trial. New Eng J Med 1991; 324: 1585-1589.
8. Appelbaum P.S., Roth L.H., Litz C.W., Benson P., Winslade W. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Centre Report 1987; 17, 20-24.
9. Kodish E., Lanton J.D. and Siegler M. The ethics of randomization. CA Cancer J Clin 1991; 41: 181-186.
10. Lilford R.J. Ethics of clinical trials from a Bayesian and decision analytic perspective: whose equipoise is it anyway? BMJ 2003; 326: 980-981.
11. Barkun J.S., Barkun A.N., Sampalis J.S., et al. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. Lancet 1992; 340: 1116-1119 (quoted by Lefering and Neugebager).
12. Kunz R., Orth K., Vogel J., et al. Laparoscopische Cholezystektomie versus Mini-Lap Cholezystektomy. Ergebnisse einer prospektiven, randomisierten Studie. Chirug 1992; 63: 291-295 (quoted by Lefering and Neugebager).
13. Lefering R and Neugebager E. Problems of randomized controlled trials (RCT) in surgery. Conference Proceedings - Nonrandomized Comparative Clinical Studies, Heidelberg, 10-11 April, 1997. Retrieved 5 February, 2004 from: http://www.symposion.com/nrccs/lefering.htm.
14. Starzl T.E. Protecting the patient's interest. Kidney Int 1985; 28(Suppl 17): S31-33.
15. Berry D.A. Ethics and ECMO, Stat Sci 1989; 4: 306-316.
16. Hellman D. Evidence, belief, and action: the failure of equipoise to resolve the ethical tension in the randomized clinical trial. J Law Med Ethics 2002; 30: 375-380.
17. Lantos J. Ethics, randomization, and technology assessment. CANCER Supplement 1994; 74: 2653-2656.
18. Ellenberg S., Fleming T., DeMets D. Data monitoring committees in clinical trials: a practical perspective. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2002.
19. Lilford R.J. Equipoise is not synonymous with uncertainty BMJ 2001; 323: 574.
20. Chard J.A., Lilford R.J. The use of equipoise in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 891-898.
21. Weijer C., Shapiro S., Glass K., Enkin M. Clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2000; 321: 756-758.
22. Sackett D.L. Equipoise, a term whose time (if it ever came) has surely gone. CMAJ 2000; 163: 835-856.
23. Sackett D.L. Uncertainty about clinical equipoise. There is another exchange on equipoise and uncertainty. BMJ. 2001; 322(7289): 795-796.
24. Miller F.G., Brody H. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Hastings Centre Report 2003; 33: 19-28.
25. Mann H., Djulbegovic B., Gold P. Failure of equipoise to resolve the ethical tension in a randomized clinical trial. J Law Med Ethics 2003; 31: 5-6.
26. Benson A.B., Pregler J.P., Bean J.A., Rademaker A.W., Eshler B., Anderson K. Oncologists' reluctance to accrue patients onto clinical trials: an Illinois Cancer Center study. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 2067-2075.
27. Taylor K.M., Margolese R.G. and Soskolne C.L. Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 1363-1367.
28. Lacher MJ. Physicians and patients as obstacles to a randomized trial. Clin Res 1978; 26: 375-379.
29. Taylor K.M. Integrating conflicting professional roles: physician participation in randomized clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 1992; 35: 217-224.
30. Tognoni G., Alli C., Avanzini F. et al. Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure. BMJ 1991; 303, 969-971.
31. Truog R.D. Randomized controlled trial of potentially life-saving therapies: are they ethical. Coronary Artery Disease 1993; 4: 835-836.
32. Dobkin B.H. A testing time: a doctor's thoughts on having his patients participate in double blind study of ticlopidine. Discover 1990; 11: 86.
33. Snowdon C., Garcia J., Elbourne D. Making sense of randomisation: responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1337-1355.
34. Snowdon C., Elbourne D., Garcia J. Zelen randomization: attitudes of parents participating in a neonatal clinical trial. Cont Clin Trials 1999; 20: 149-171.
35. Snowdon C., Garcia J., Elbourne D. Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study. BMJ 1998; 317:21-26.
36. Snowdon C., Garcia J., Elbourne D. Decisions, Decisions: How Do Parents View the Decision They Made About a Randomized Clinical Trial? In Fullford KWM, Dickenson DL, Murray T Healthcare Ethics and Human Values: An Introductory Text with Readings and Case Studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002: 261-269.
37. UK Collaborative ECMO Trial Group. UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Lancet 1996; 348: 75-82.
38. Ainsworth S.B., Beresford M.W., Milligan D.W.A. et al. Pumactant and poractant alfa for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates born at 25-29 weeks' gestation: a randomised trial. Lancet 2000; 355; 1387-1392.
39. Snowdon C., Elbourne D., Garcia J. Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature. Arch Dis Child 2004, in press.
40. Snowdon C., Elbourne D., Garcia J. Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists. Arch Dis Child 2004, in press.
41. Snowdon C., Elbourne D., Garcia J. Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of bereaved parents. Arch Dis Child 2004, in press.
42. Chalmers I. Scientific enquiry and authoritarianism in perinatal care and education. Birth 1983; 10: 3: 151-166.
43. Silverman W.A. Human experimentation: a guided step into the unknown. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
44. Chalmers I. Minimizing harm and maximising benefit during innovation in health care: controlled or uncontrolled experimentation. Birth 1986; 13: 155-164.
45. Tobias J.S. and Souhami R.L. Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel. BMJ 1993; 307: 1199-1120.
46. Baum M. Clinical trials - a brave new partnership: a response to Mrs Thornton. J Med Ethics 1994; 20: 23-25.
47. Segelov E., Tattersall M.H., Coates A.S. Redressing the balance: the ethics of not entering an eligible patient on a randomized clinical trial. Ann Oncol 1992; 3: 103-105.
48. Mills N., Donovan J.L., Smith M., Jacoby A., Neal D.E., Hamdy F.C. Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study. Control Clin Trials 2003; 24: 272-282.
49. Jenkins V., Leach L., Fallowfield L., Nicholls K., Newsham A. Describing randomisation: patients' and the public's preferences compared with clinicians' preference. Br J Cancer Res 2002; 87: 854-858.