The contribution of faculty of color to undergraduate education

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 317-345

  Umbach, Paul D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

College faculty; Diversity; Undergraduate education

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644898888     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-005-9391-3     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aguirre, A. (2000). Women and Minority Faculty in the Academic Workplace: Recruitment, Retention, and Academic Culture, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
2. Antonio, A. A. (2002). Faculty of color reconsidered: Reassessing contributions to scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education 73(5): 582-602.
3. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman and Hall, London.
4. Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
5. Astin, H. S., Antonio, A. A., Cress, C. M., and Astin, A. W. (1997). Race and Ethnicity in the American Professoriate, 1995-1996, Higher Education Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA.
6. Astone, B., and Nunez-Wormack, E. (1990). Pursuing Diversity: Recruiting College Minority Students, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
7. Baldwin, R., and Chronister, J. (2001). Teaching without Tenure: Practices and Policies for a New Era, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
8. Benjamin, E. (1998). Declining faculty availability to students is the problem - but tenure is not the explanation. American Behavioral Scientist 41(5): 716-735.
9. Benjamin, E. (1998). Variations in the characteristics of part-time faculty by general fields of instruction and research. In: Leslie, D. W. (ed.): The Growing use of Part-time Faculty: Understanding the Causes and Effects, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 45-59.
10. Benjamin, E. (2002). How over-reliance on contingent appointments diminishes faculty involvement in student learning. Peer Review 5(1): 4-10.
11. Berger, J. M., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., and Zelditch, M. J. (1977). Status Characteristics and Social Interaction, Elsevier, New York, NY.
12. Berger, J. M., Rosenholtz, S. J., and Zelditch, M. J. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology 6: 479-508.
13. Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 195-203.
14. Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology 51(3): 204-213.
15. Blackwell, J. E. (1989). Mentoring: An action strategy for increasing minority faculty. Academe 75(5): 8-14.
16. Carter, D. J., and Wilson, R. (1997). Fifteenth Annual Status Report on Minorities in Higher Education, American Council on Education, Washington, DC.
17. Chickering, A. W., and Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin 39(7): 3-7.
18. Chronister, J., and Baldwin, R. (1999). Marginal or mainstream? Full-time faculty off the tenure track. Liberal Education 85(4): 16-23.
19. Cohen, E. G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology 8: 209-235.
20. Cole, S., and Barber, E. (2003). Increasing Faculty Diversity: The Occupational Choices of High-achieving Minority Students, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Conant, R. C., and Ashby, W. R. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science 1(2): 89-97.
22. De la Luz Reyes, M., and Halcón, J. J. (1991). Practices of the academy: Barriers to access for Chicano academics. In: Altbach, P. G., and Lomotey, K. (eds.), The Racial Crisis in American Higher Education, SUNY Press, Albany, NY, pp. 167-186.
23. Duster, T. (1993). The diversity of California at Berkeley: An emerging reformulation of "competence" in a multicultural world. In: Thompson, B. W., and Tyagi, S. (eds.), Beyond a Dream Deferred: Multicultural Education and the Politics of Excellence, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 143-157.
24. Ethington, C. A. (1997). A hierarchical linear modeling approach to studying college effects. In: Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 12, Agathon, New York, pp. 165-194.
25. Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
26. Feldman, K. A., and Newcomb, T. M. (1969). The Impact of College on Students, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
27. Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., and Schuster, J. H. (1998). The New Academic Generation: A Profession in Transformation, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
28. Gappa, J. M., and Leslie, D. W. (1993). The Invisible Faculty: Improving the Status of Part-timers in Higher Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
29. Gurin, P. (1999). Expert report of Patricia Gurin. In: Mich, (ed.), The compelling need for diversity in higher education, Gratz et al. V. Bollinger et al., No. 97-75237 and Grutter et al. V. Bollinger et al. No. 97-75928. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.
30. Harlow, R. (2003). "Race doesn't matter, but...": The effect of race on professors' experiences and emotion management in the undergraduate classroom. Social Psychology Quarterly 66(4): 348-363.
31. Heck, R. H., and Thomas, S. L. (2000). An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
32. Higgerson, M., and Higgerson, R. (1991). Affirmative action guidelines: Do they impede progress? CUPA Journal 42(4): 11-14.
33. Holland, J. L. (1966). The Psychology of Vocational Choice, Blaisdell, Waltham, MA.
34. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making Vocational Choices, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
35. Hurtado, S. (2001). Linking diversity and educational purpose: How diversity affects the classroom environment and student development. In: Orfield, G., and Kurlaender, M. (eds.), Diversity Challenged: Evidence on the Impact of Affirmative Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 187-203.
36. Hurtado, S., Milem, J., Clayton-Pedersen, A., and Allen, W. (1998). Enacting campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity through educational policy and practice. The Review of Higher Education 21(3): 279-302.
37. Hurtado, S., Milem, J., Clayton-Pedersen, A., and Allen, W. (1999). Enacting Diverse Learning Environments: Improving the Climate for Racial/ethnic Diversity in Higher Education, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
38. Johnsrud, L., and Sadao, K. (1998). The common experience of otherness: Ethnic and racial minority faculty. Review of Higher Education 21(4): 315-342.
39. Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the national survey of student engagement. Change 33(3): 10-17, 66.
40. Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change 35(2): 24-32.
41. Kuh, G. D., and Hu, S. P. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education 24(3): 309-332.
42. Liu, G. (1998). Affirmative action in higher education: The diversity rationale and the compelling interest test. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 33: 381-442.
43. Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel Modeling, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
44. Menges, R. J., and Exum, W. H. (1983). Barriers to the progress of women and minority faculty. The Journal of Higher Education 54: 123-144.
45. Mickelson, M. L., and Oliver, M. L. (1991). Making the short list: Black candidates and the faculty recruitment process. In: Altbach, P. G., and Lomotey, K. (eds.), The Racial Crisis in American Higher Education, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
46. Milem, J. F. (2001). Diversity is not enough: How campus climate and faculty teaching methods affect student outcomes. In: Orfield, G. (eds.), Diversity Challenged: Legal Crisis and New Evidence, Harvard Education Publishing Group, Cambridge, MA, pp. 233-249.
47. Milem, J. F., and Astin, H. S. (1993). The changing composition of faculty: What does it really mean for diversity?. Change 25(2): 21-27.
48. Milem, J. F., and Hakuta, K. (2000). The benefits of racial and ethnic diversity in higher education. In: Wilds, D. (ed.), Minorities in Higher Education: Seventeenth Annual Status Report, American Council on Education, Washington, DC, pp. 39-67.
49. Milem, J. F., and Umbach, P. D. (2003). Examining the perpetuation hypothesis: The influence of pre-college factors on students' predispositions regarding diversity activities in college. Journal of College Student Development 44(5): 611-624.
50. Milem, J. F., Umbach, P. D., and Liang, C. (2004). Exploring the perpetuation hypothesis: The role of college and universities in desegregating society. Journal of College Student Development 45(6): 688-700.
51. Mulkay, M. (1972). The Social Process of Innovation: A Study in the Sociology of Science, Macmillan Press, London.
52. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from 20 Years of Research, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
53. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affecta Students: A Third Decade of Research, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
54. Perna, L. (2001). Sex and race differences in faculty tenure and promotion. Research in Higher Education 42(5): 541-567.
55. Rakow, L. (1991). Gender and race in the classroom: Teaching way out of line. Feminist Teacher 6: 10-13.
56. Raudenbush, S. W., and Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
57. Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
58. Roueche, J. E., Rouche, S. D., and Milliron, M. D. (1995). Strangers in their Own Land: Part-time Faculty in American Community Colleges, Community College Press, Washington, DC.
59. Rudenstine, N. (1996). The uses of diversity. Harvard Magazine 4: 48-62.
60. Smart, J. C., Feldman, K. A., and Ethington, C. A. (2000). Academic Disciplines: Holland's Theory and the Study of College Students and Faculty, Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN.
61. Smith, D. G. (1989). The Challenge of Diversity: Involvement or Alienation in the Academy, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
62. Smith, D. G., and Associates, (1997). Diversity Works: The Emerging Picture of How Students Benefit, American Association of Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC.
63. Smith, D. G., and Schonfeld, (2000). The benefits of diversity: What the research tells us. About Campus 5(5): 16-23.
64. Snyder, T. D., and Hoffman, C. M. (2003). Digest of Education Statistics 2002, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics., Washington, DC.
65. Statham, A., Richardson, L., and Cook, J. (1991). Gender and University Teaching: A Negotiated Difference, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
66. Tierney, W. G. (1993). Building Communities of Difference: Higher Education in the Twenty-first Century, Bergin & Garvey, Westport, CT.
67. Tierney, W. G., and Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
68. Trower, C. A., and Chait, R. (2002). Faculty diversity: Too little for too long. Harvard Magazine 104(4): 33.
69. Turner, C. S. (2003). Incorporation and marginalization in the academy: From border toward center for faculty of color. Journal of Black Studies 34(1): 112-125.
70. Turner, C. S., and Myers, S. L. J. (2000). Faculty of Color in Academe: Bittersweet Success, Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
71. Turner, C. S., Myers, S. L. J., and Creswell, J. W. (1999). Exploring underrepresentation: The case of faculty of color in the Midwest. The Journal of Higher Education 70(1): 27-59.
72. Umbach, P. D., and Kuh, G. D. (in press). Student experiences with diversity at liberal arts colleges: Another claim for distinctiveness. The Journal of Higher Education.
73. Umbach, P. D., and Milem, J. F. (2004). Applying Holland's typology to the study of differences in student views about diversity. Research in Higher Education 45(6): 625-649.
74. Umbach, P. D., and Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education 46(2): 153-184.
75. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(1): 1-19.
76. Weick, K. E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
77. Weick, K. E. (1982). Administering education in loosely coupled schools. Phi Delta Kappan 63(10): 673-676.