Feral beets - with help from the maritime wild?

Crop Ferality and Volunteerism

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 45-58

  Sukopp, Ulrich ^a   Pohl, Matthias ^b   Driessen, Sarah ^c   Bartsch, Detlef ^d  

^a Federal Agency for Nature Conservation   (Germany)

^b TUV Hannover/Sachsen Anhalt eV   (Germany)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d Bundesamt fur Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644868873     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420037999     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Abe J, Guan G-P, Shimamoto Y. 1997. A gene complex for annual habit in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Euphytica 94:129-135.
2. Abe J, Yoshikawa H, Tsuda CH. 1986. Reproductive barriers in sugar beet and its wild relatives of the section Vulgaresin the genus Beta. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 63:40-48.
3. Andow DA. 2003. UK farm-scale evaluations of transgenic herbicide-tolerant crops. Nature Biotech. 12:1453-1454.
4. Arnaud JF, Viard F, Delescluse M, Cuguen J. 2003. Evidence for gene flow via seed dispersal from crop to wild relatives in Beta vulgaris (Chenopodiaceae): consequences for the release of genetically modified crop species with weedy lineages. Proc. R. Soc. London B 270:1565-1571.
5. Barocka KH. 1985. Zucker- und Futterrüben. In Lehrbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung landwirtschaftlicher Kulturformen, Fischbeck G, Plarre W, Schuster W, Eds., 2:245-287. Berlin/Hamburg: Paul Parey.
6. Bartsch D, Brand U. 1998. Saline soil condition decreases rhizomania infection of Beta vulgaris. J. Plant Pathol. 80:219-223.
7. Bartsch D, Brand U, Morak C, Pohl-Orf M, Schuphan I, Ellstrand, NC. 2001. Biosafety of hybrids between transgenic virus-resistant sugar beet and Swiss chard. Ecol. Appl. 11:142-147.
8. Bartsch D, Clegg J, Ellstrand NC. 1999. Origin of wild beet and gene flow between Beta vulgaris and Beta macrocarpa in California. Gene flow and agriculture - relevance for transgenic crops, BCPC Symposium Proceedings 72, pp. 269-274. Farnham, Surrey: British Crop Protection Council.
9. Bartsch D, Cuguen J, Biancardi E, Sweet J. 2003. Environmental implications of gene flow from sugar beet to wild beet - current status and future research needs. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2:105-115.
10. Bartsch D, Ellstrand NC. 1999. Genetic evidence for the origin of Californian wild beets (genus Beta). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:1120-1130.
11. Bartsch D, Hoffmann A, Lehnen M, Wehres U. 2003. Ecological consequences of gene flow from cultivars to wild relatives, Rhizomania resistance genes in the genus Beta. In Ecological impact of GMO dissemination in agro-ecosystems, Lelley T, Balázs E, Tepfer M, Eds., pp. 115-130. Vienna:Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandelsgesellschaft AG.
12. Bartsch D, Lehnen M, Clegg J, Pohl-Orf M, Schuphan I, Ellstrand, NC. 1999. Impact of gene flow from cultivated beet on genetic diversity of wild sea beet populations. Mol. Ecol. 8:1733-1741.
13. Bartsch D, Pohl-Orf M. 1996. Ecological aspects of transgenic sugar beet: transfer and expression of herbicide resistance in hybrids with wild beets. Euphytica 91:55-58.
14. Bartsch D, Schmidt M. 1997. Influence of sugar beet breeding on populations of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima in Italy. J. Veg. Sci. 8:81-84.
15. Bartsch D, Schmidt M, Pohl-Orf M, Haag C, Schuphan I. 1996. Competitiveness of transgenic sugar beet resistant to beet necrotic yellow vein virus and potential impact on wild beet populations. Mol. Ecol. 5:199-205.
16. Bartsch D, Schmitz G. 2002. Recent experience with biosafety research and role of post-market environmental monitoring in risk management of plant biotechnology derived crops. In Biotechnology and safety assessment, Thomas J, Fuchs R, Eds., 3rd ed. pp. 13-38. San Diego: Academic Press.
17. Bartsch D, Schuphan I. 2002. Lessons we can learn from ecological biosafety research. J. Biotechnol. 98:71-77.
18. Bastown R, Mylne JS, Lister C, Lippman Z, Martienssen RA, Dean C. 2004. Vernalization requires epigenetic silencing of FLC by histone methylation. Nature 427:165-167.
19. Boudry P, McCombie H, van Dijk H. 2002. Vernalization requirement of wild beet Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: among population variation and its adaptive significance. J. Ecol. 90:693-703.
20. Boudry P, Mörchen M, Saumitou-Laprade P, Vernet P, van Dijk H. 1993. The origin and evolution of weed beets: consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar-beets. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:471-478.
21. Boudry P, Wieber R, Saumitou-Laprade P, Pillen K, van Dijk H, Jung C. 1994. Identification of RFLP markers closely linked to the bolting gene B and their significance for the study of the annual habit in beets (Beta vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:852-858.
22. Brooks DR, Bohan DA, Champion GT, Haughton AJ, Hawes C, et al. 2003. Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. I. Soilsurface- active invertebrates. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 358:1847-1862.
23. Cai D, Kleine M, Kifle S, Harloff HJ, Sandal NN, et al. 1997. Positional cloning of a gene for nematode resistance in sugar beet. Science 275:832-834.
24. Champion GT. 2000. The biology of weed beet. Br. Sugar Beet Rev. 68:53-55.
25. Crawley MJ, Brown SL, Hails RS, Kohn D, Rees M. 2001. Transgenic crops in natural habitats. Nature 408:682-683.
26. Cuguen J, Arnaud JF, Delescluse M, Viard F. 2004. Crop/wild interaction within the Beta vulgaris complex: a comparative analysis of genetic diversity between sea beet and weed beet populations within the French sugar beet production area. In Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives and its consequences, den Nijs H, Bartsch D, Sweet J, Eds., pp. 183-201. Wallingford:CABI.
27. Darmency H. 1997. Gene flow between crops and weeds: risk for new herbicide resistant weeds? In Weed and crop resistance to herbicides, De Prado R, Jorrin J, Garcia-Torres L, Eds., pp. 239-248. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluver Academic Publishers.
28. Desplanque B, Boudry P, Broomberg K, Saumitou-Laprade P, Cuguen J, van Dijk, H. 1999. Genetic diversity and gene flow between wild, cultivated and weedy forms of Beta vulgaris L. (Chenopodiaceae), assessed by RFLP and microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:1194-1201.
29. Desplanque B, Hautekeete N, van Dijk H. 2002. Transgenic weed beets: possible, probable, avoidable? J. Appl. Ecol. 39:561-571.
30. Dewar AM, May MHJ, Woiwood IP, Haylock LA, Champion GT, et al. 2003. A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit. Proc. R. Soc. London B 270:335-340.
31. Doney DL, Whitney ED, Terry J, Frese L, Fitzgerald P. 1990. The distribution and dispersal of Beta vulgaris L. ssp. maritima germplasm in England, Wales, and Ireland. J. Sugar Beet Res. 27:29-37.
32. Driessen S, Pohl M, Bartsch D. 2001. RAPD-PCR analysis of the genetic origin of sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) at Germany’s Baltic Sea coast. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2:341-349.
33. El-Mezawy A, Dreyer F, Jacobs G, Jung C. 2002. High-resolution mapping of the bolting gene B of sugar beet. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105:100-105.
34. Elseth GD, Baumgardner KD. 1981. Population biology. New York: Van Nostrand.
35. Fischer HE. 1989. Origin of the ‘Weisse Schlesische Rübe’ (white Silesian beet) and resynthesis of sugar beet. Euphytica 41:75-80.
36. Ford-Lloyd BV. 1986. Infraspecific variation in wild and cultivated beets and its effect upon infraspecific classification. In Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants, Styles BT, Ed., pp. 331-334. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37. Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG. 1986. Weed beets, their origin and classification. Acta Horticultura 82:399-401.
38. Ford-Lloyd BV, Williams JT. 1975. A revision of Beta section Vulgares (Chenopodiaceae), with new light on the origin of cultivated beets. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 71:89-102.
39. Gepts P, Papa R. 2003. Possible effects of (trans)gene flow from crops on the genetic diversity from landraces and wild relatives. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2:89-103.
40. Haughton AJ, Champion GT, Hawes C, Heard MS, Brooks DR, et al. 2003. Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Withinfield epigeal and aerial arthropods. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 358:1863-1877.
41. Hautekeete N, Piquot Y, van Dijk H. 2002. Life span in Beta vulgaris maritima: the impacts of disturbance and of age at first reproduction. J. Ecol. 90:508-516.
42. Hawes C, Haughton AJ, Osborne JL, Roy DB, Clark SJ, et al. 2003. Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regime in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 358:1899-1913.
43. Haygood R, Ives AR, Andow DA. 2003. Consequences of recurrent gene flow from crops to wild relatives. Proc. R. Soc. London B 270:1879-1886.
44. Heard MS, Hawes C, Champion GT, Clark SJ, Firbank LG, et al. 2003a. Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 358:1819-1832.
45. Heard MS, Hawes C, Champion GT, Clark SJ, Firbank LG, et al. 2003b. Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. II. Effects on individual species. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 358:1833-1846.
46. Johnson RT, Burtch LM. 1959. The problem of wild annual sugar beets in California. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 10:311-317.
47. Jung C, Pillen K, Frese L, Fahr S, Melchinger AE. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships between cultivated and wild species in the genus Beta revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:449-457.
48. Lange W, Brandenburg WA, de Bock TSM. 1999. Taxonomy and cultonomy of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 130:81-96.
49. Laporte V, Viard F, Béna G, Valero M, Cuguen J. 2001. The spatial structure of sexual and cytonuclear polymorphism in the gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima at a local scale. Genetics 157:1699-1710.
50. Lavigne C, Klein EK, Couvet D. 2002. Using seed purity data to estimate an average pollen mediated gene flow from crops to wild relatives. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104:139-145.
51. Letschert JPW. 1993. Beta section Beta: biogeographical patterns of variation and taxonomy. Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 93. 153 pp.
52. Longden P, May MJ, Fisher S. 2002. Weed beet control 2002. Br. Sugar Beet Rev. 70:38-41.
53. Madsen K, Jensen J. 1995. Weed control in glyphosate tolerant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Weed Res. 35:105-111.
54. Mansfeld R. 1986. Verzeichnis landwirtschaftlicher und gärtnerischer Kulturpflanzen. Hamburg:Springer.
55. McFarlane JS. 1975. Naturally occurring hybrids between sugarbeet and Beta macrocarpa in the Imperial Valley of California. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Tech. 18:245-251.
56. Mücher T, Hesse P, Pohl-Orf M, Ellstrand NC, Bartsch D. 2000. Characterization of weed beets in Germany and Italy. J. Sugar Beet Res. 37(3):19-38.
57. Munerati O. 1932. Sull’incrocio della barbatiola coltivata con la Beta selvaggia della costa adriatica. L’Indust. Saccarifera Ital. 25:303-304.
58. Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590.
59. Pohl-Orf M, Brand U, Driessen S, Hesse PR, Lehnen M, et al. 1999. Overwintering of genetically modified sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris, as a source for dispersal of transgenic pollen. Euphytica 108:181-186.
60. Pohl-Orf M, Morak C, Wehres U, Saeglitz C, Driessen S, et al. 2000. The environmental impact of gene flow from sugar beet to wild beet - an ecological comparison of transgenic and natural virus tolerance genes. Proc. Int. Symp. on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, 6th, Saskatoon, pp. 51-55. Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan.
61. Raybould AF, Gray AJ. 1993. Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J. Appl. Ecol. 30:199-219.
62. Sadeghian SY, Becker HC, Johansson E. 1993. Inheritance of bolting in three sugar beet crosses after different periods of vernalization. Plant Breed. 104:328-333.
63. Saeglitz C, Bartsch D. 2002. Gene flow from transgenic plants. http://www.agbiotechnet.com.
64. Sester M, Delanoy M, Colbach N, Darmency H. 2004. Crop and density effects on weed beet growth and reproduction. Weed Res. 44:50-59.
65. Simpson GG, Dean C. 2002. Arabidopsis, the Rosetta Stone of flowering time? Science 296:285-289.
66. Slyvchenko O, Bartsch D. 2004. Introgression of cultivar beet genes to wild beet in the Ukraine. In Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives and its consequences, den Nijs H, Bartsch D, Sweet J, Eds., pp. 173-182. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
67. Soukup J, Holec J. 2004. Crop/wild interaction within the Beta vulgaris complex: agronomic aspects of weed beet in the Czech Republic. In Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives and its consequences, den Nijs H, Bartsch D, Sweet J, Eds., pp. 203-218. Wallingford, UK:CABI.
68. Soukup J, Holec J, Vejl P, Skupinova S, Sedlak P. 2002. Diversity and distribution of weed beet in the Czech Republic. J. Plant Dis. Protect. 18:67-74.
69. Sukopp H, Sukopp U. 1993. Ecological long-term effects of cultigens becoming feral and of naturalization of non-native species. Experientia 49:210-218.
70. Sung S, Amasino RM. 2004. Vernalization in Arabidopsis thaliana is mediated by the PHD finger protein VIN3. Nature 427:159-164.
71. van de Peer Y, de Wachter R. 1994. TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Comp. Appli. Biosci. 10:569-570.
72. van Dijk H. 2004. Gene exchange between wild and crop in Beta vulgaris: How easy is hybridization and what will happen in later generations? In In Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives and its consequences, den Nijs H, Bartsch D, Sweet J, Eds., pp. 53-61. Wallingford, UK:CABI.
73. van Dijk H, Boudry P, McCombie H, Vernet P. 1997. Flowering time in wild beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) along a latitudinal cline. Acta Oecol. 18:47-60.
74. van Dijk H, Desplanque B. 1999. European Beta: crops and their wild and weedy relatives. Plant evolution in man-made habitats, Proc. Int. Symp. IOPB, 7th, Amsterdam, pp. 257-270. Amsterdam:Hugo de Vries Laboratory.
75. Van Raamsdonk LWD, Van der Maesen LJG. 1996. Crop-weed complexes: the complex relationship between crop plants and their wild relatives. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45:135-155.
76. Viard F, Arnaud JF, Delescluse M, Cuguen J. 2004. Tracing back seed and pollen flow within the crop-wild Beta vulgaris complex: genetic distinctiveness vs. hot spots of hybridization over a regional scale. Mol. Ecol. 13:1357-1364.
77. Viard F, Bernard J, Desplanque B. 2002. Crop-weed interactions in the Beta vulgaris complex at a local scale: allelic diversity and gene flow within sugar beet fields. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104:688-697.