Taxonomy and cultonomy of beet (Beta vulgaris L.)

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 81-96

  Lange, Wouter ^a   Brandenburg, Willem A ^a   De Bock, Theo S M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chenopodiaceae; Classification; New cultivar groups; Nomenclature; Weed beet

Indexed keywords

BETA VULGARIS;

EID: 0033061786     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/bojl.1998.0250     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alefeld F. 1866. Landwirtschaftliche Flora. Berlin: Wiegandt & Herpel.
2. Alexander C. 1997. Do we need the term 'culton? Hortax News 1: 6-9.
3. Boiteau R, Christmann J. 1997. Les betteraves mauvaises herbes. Situation actuelle et importance du problème. Proceedings of the 40th Winter Congress of IIRB. Brussels, 157-165.
4. Boudry P, Broomberg K, Saumitou-Laparade P, Mörchen M, Cuguen J, Van Dijk H, Jones DD. 1994. Gene escape in transgenic sugar beet: what can be learned from molecular studies of weed beet populations? Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium. Monterey, California, U.S.A., 75-87.
5. Boudry P, Mörchen M, Saumitou-Laparade P, Vernet Ph, Van Dijk H. 1993. The origin and evolution of weed beet: consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar beets. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87: 471-478.
6. Brandenburg WA, Oost EH, Van De Vooren JG. 1982. Taxonomic aspects of the germplasm conservation of cross-pollinated cultivated plants. In: Porceddu E, Jenkins G, eds. Seed regeneration in cross-pollinated species. Rotterdam: Balkema, 33-41.
7. Brandenburg WA. 1984. Biosystematics and hybridization of horticultural plants. In: Grant WF, ed. Plant biosystematics. Don Mills, Canada: Academic Press, 617-632.
8. Brandenburg WA. 1986. Objectives in classification of cultivated plants. In: Styles BT, ed. Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants. The Systematic Association, Special Volume 29: 87-98. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Brandenburg WA, Schneider F. 1988. Cultivar grouping in relation to the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants. Taxon 37: 141-147.
10. De Candolle ALPP. 1867. Lois de la Nomenclature Bontanique. Paris: J.-Bailières et fils.
11. De Candolle ALPP. 1883. Origine des Plantes Cultivées. Paris: Germer Bailières et Cie.
12. De Wet JMJ. 1981. Species concepts and systematics of domesticated cereals. Kulturpflanze 29: 177-198.
13. Evans A, Weir J. 1981. The evolution of weed beet in sugar beet populations. Kulturpflanze 29: 301-310.
14. Ford-Lloyd BV. 1973. Biosytematics of the genus Beta. Birmingham: University of Birmingham
15. Ford-Lloyd BV. 1986. Infraspecific variation in wild and cultivated beets and its effect upon infraspecific classification. In: Styles BT, ed. Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants. The Systematic Assocation, Special Volume 29: 331-344. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Ford-Lloyd BV, Williams JT. 1975. A revision of Beta Section Vulgares (Chenopodiaceae), with new light on the origin of cultivated beets. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 71: 89-102.
17. Frandsen KJ. 1958. Breeding of forage beets. In: Kappert H, Rudorf W, eds. Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung vol. 3. Berlin & Hamburg: Paul Parey, 284-311.
18. Greuter W, Barrie F, Burdet HM, Chaloner WG, Demoulin V, Hawksworth DL, Jørgensen PM, Nicolson DH, Silva PC, Trehane P, McNeil J, eds. 1994. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Tokyo Code). Regnum Vegetabile No. 131 Königstein: Koeltz.
19. Helm J. 1957. Versuch einer morphologisch-systematischen Gliederung von Beta vulgaris L. Züchter 27: 203-222.
20. Hetterscheid WLA, Van Den Berg RG, Brandenburg WA. 1996. An annotated history of the principles of cultivated plant classification. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 45: 123-134.
21. Hetterscheid WLA, Brandenburg WA. 1995a. The culton concept: setting the stage for an unambiguous taxonomy of cultivated plants. Acta Horticulturae 413: 29-34.
22. Hetterscheid WLA, Brandenburg WA. 1995b. Culton versus taxon: conceptual issues in cultivated plant systematics. Taxon 44: 161-175.
23. Hjerdin A, Säll T, Nilsson NO, Bornman CH, Halldén C. 1994. Genetic variation among wild and cultivated beets of the section Beta as revealed by RELP analysis. Journal of Sugar Beet Research 31: 59-67.
24. Hornsey KG, Arnold MH. 1979. The origins of weed beets. Annals of Applied Biology 92: 279-285.
25. Johnson RT, Burtch LM. 1959. The problem of wild annual sugar beets in California. Journal of the American Society for Sugar Beet Technologists 10: 311-317.
26. Jung C, Pillen K, Frese L, Melchinger A. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships between cultivated and wild species of the genus Beta revealed by DNA 'fingerprinting'. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 449-457.
27. Knapp E. 1958. Beta-Rüben, Bes. Zuckerrüben. In: Kappert H, Rudorf W, eds. Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung vol. 3. Berlin & Hamburg: Paul Parey, 196-284.
28. Letschert JPW. 1993. Beta section Beta: biogeographical patterns of variation, and taxonomy. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 93-1: 1-155.
29. Letschert JPW, Lange W, Frese L, Van Den Berg RG. 1994. Taxonomy of Beta Section Beta. Journal of Sugar Beet Research 31: 69-85.
30. Linnaeus C. 1753. Species Plantarum. Ed. 1. Stockholm.
31. Linnaeus C. 1762. Species Plantarum. Ed. 2. Stockholm.
32. Linnaeus C. 1767. Systema Naturae. Ed. 11-12.
33. McFarlane JS. 1975. Naturally occurring hybrids between sugarbeet and Beta macrocarpa in the Imperial Valley of California. Journal of the American Society for Sugar Beet Technologists 18: 245-251.
34. McNeill J. 1998. Culton: a useful term, questionably argued. Hortax News 1: 15-22.
35. Nagamine T, Todd GA, McKann KP, Newbury HJ, Ford-Lloyd BV. 1989. Use of restriction fragment length polymorphism to fingerprint beets at the genotype and species level. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 78: 847-851.
36. Schondelmaier J, Jung C. 1997. Chromosomal assignment of the linkage groups of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris E.) using primary trisomics. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 590-596.
37. Schumacher K, Schondelmaier J, Barzen E, Steinrücken G, Borchardt D, Salamini F, Jung C, Weber WE. 1997. The combination of different linkage maps in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) into one map. Plant Breeding 116: 23-38.
38. Shen Y, Newbury HJ, Ford-Lloyd BV. 1996. The taxonomic characterisation of annual Beta germplasm in a genetic resources collection using RAPD markers. Euphytica 91: 205-212.
39. Transhel VA. 1927. Obzor vida roda Beta. Trudy prikl Bot Genet Selek 17: 203-223.
40. Trehane P, Brickell CD, Baum BR, Hetterscheid WLA, Leslie AC, McNeill J, Sprongberg SA, Vrugtman F, eds. 1995. The International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants 1995. Regnum Vegetabile No. 133. Wimborne, U.K.: Quarterjack Publishing.
41. Ulbrich E. 1934. Beta. In: Engler A, Prantl V, eds. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Ed. 2, 16c: 457-480.
42. Waters. 1998. A comment on the culton concept. Hortax News 2: 13-15.