Mainstreaming alternatives in veterinary medical education: Resource development and curricular reform

Journal of Veterinary Medical Education

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 473-480

  Hart, Lynette A ^a,b   Wood, Mary W ^b   Weng, Hsin Yi ^b  

^a Department of Population Health and Reproduction ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33644758195     PISSN: 0748321X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/jvme.32.4.473     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Klestinec C. A history of anatomy theaters in sixteenth-century Padua. J Hist Med Allied Sci 59:375-412, 2004.
2. Van der Balk J, Dewhurst D, Hughes I, Atkinson J, Balcombe J, Braun H, Gabrielson K, Gruber F, Miles J, Nab J, Nardi J, van Wilgenburg H, Zinko U, Zurlo J. Alternatives to the use of animals in higher education: The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 33. Altern Lab Anim 27:39-52, 1999.
3. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. The Ethics of Research Involving Animals. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2005.
4. United States Animal Welfare Act TUSC 2131-2159, adopted 1966, amended 2002 〈http://www.aphis.useda. gov/ac/awa.html〉. Accessed 07/24/05.
5. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Care. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Animal Care Policy Manual Policy #11-Painful Procedures-April 14, 1997 〈http:// www.aphis.usda.gov/ac/policy/policy11.pdf〉. Accessed 09/07/05.
6. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Care. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Animal Care Policy Manual Policy #12-Consideration of Alternatives to Painful/Distressful Procedures-June 21, 2000 〈http://www.aphis. usda.gov/ac/policy/policy12.pdf〉 Accessed 09/07/05.
7. Morton DB. Animal use in education and the alternatives. Altern Lab Anim 14:334-343, 1987.
8. Ammons SW. Use of live animals in the curricula of US medical schools in 1994. Acad Med 70:739-743, 1995.
9. Connelly R. Animal use on the decline in medical schools. Lab Anim 31(7):12, 2002.
10. Hansen LA, Boss GR. Use of live animals in the curricula of US medical schools: Survey results from 2001. Acad Med 77(11):1147-1149, 2002.
11. Orlans FB. Use of animals in education: Policy and practice in the United States. J Biol Educ 25:27-32, 1991.
12. Orlans FB. An ethical rationale for why students should not be permitted to harm or kill animals. In Balls M, van Zeller AM, Halder M, eds. Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000 p1323-1331.
13. Balcombe J. Alternatives in education: Overcoming barriers to acceptance. In van Zutphen LFM, Balls M, eds. Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1997 p441-444.
14. Balcombe J. Student/teacher conflict regarding animal dissection. Am Biol Teach 59:22-25, 1997.
15. Balcombe J. A global overview of law and policy concerning animal use in education. In Balls M, van Zeller AM, Halder M, eds. Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000 p1343-1350.
16. Balcombe J. The Use of Animals in Higher Education: Problems, Alternatives and Recommendations. Washington, DC: Humane Society Press, 2000.
17. Balcombe J. Dissection: The scientific case for alternatives. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 4:117-126, 2001.
18. Balcombe J. Medical training using simulation: Toward fewer animals and safer patients. Altern Lab Anim (suppl. 1):553-560, 2004.
19. The Norwegian Reference Centre for Laboratory Animal Science and Alternatives (NORINA) 〈http:// www.bio.mq.edu.au/NORINA/search.html〉. Accessed 09/07/05.
20. Jukes N, Chiuia M. From Guinea Pig to Computer Mouse: Alternative Methods for a Progressive, Humane Education, 2nd ed. Leicester, UK: International Network for Humane Education (InterNICHE), 2003.
21. Hart LA, Wood MW. Uses of animals and alternatives in college and veterinary education at the University of California, Davis: Institutional commitment for mainstreaming alternatives. Altern Lab Anim 32(suppl. 1):617-620, 2004.
22. Branch CE, Robertson BT. Interactive video disc simulated animal experiments: Heart sounds and murmurs in the dog. J Vet Med Educ 13:19-21, 1986.
23. Fawver AL, Branch CE, Trentham L, Robertson BT, Beckett SD. A comparison of interactive videodisc instruction with live animal laboratories. Am J Physiol 259:S11-S14, 1990.
24. Kozlowski GP, St Clair LE. Use of freeze-dried specimens in the teaching of veterinary gross anatomy. J Vet Med Educ 1(1):1-3, 1974.
25. Carpenter LG, Piermattei DL, Salman MD, Orton EC, Nelson AW, Smeak DD, Jennings PB, Taylor RA. A comparison of surgical training with live anesthetized dogs and cadavers. Vet Surg 20:373-378, 1991.
26. Bauer MS. A survey of the use of live animals, cadavers, inanimate models, and computers in teaching veterinary surgery. J Am Vet Med Assoc 203:1047-1051, 1993.
27. Bauer MS, Glickman N, Glickman L, Toombs JP, Bill P. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a cadaver laboratory during a 4th year veterinary surgery rotation. J Vet Med Educ 19:77-84, 1992.
28. Bauer MS, Glickman N, Salisbury SK, Toombs JP, Prostredny JM. Survival vs. terminal animal laboratories to teach small animal surgery. J Vet Med Educ 19:54-58, 1992.
29. Olsen D, Bauer MS, Seim HB, Salman MD. Evaluation of a hemostasis model for teaching basic surgical skills compared with splenectomy on live dogs. Vet Surg 25:49-58, 1996.
30. Iowa State University. Biomedical Communications 〈http://www.vetmed. iastate.edu/services/college/bmc/ default.asp〉 Accessed 08/02/05.
31. Provo-Klimek JA, Troyer DL. A novel method for preparing histology slides to integrate the teaching of gross and microscopic anatomy. J Vet Med Educ 29:137-141, 2002.
32. Daniloff JK. The development of clinical laboratory exercises for veterinary neuroanatomy classes. J Vet Med Educ 21:21-22, 1994.
33. Hedlund CS, Hosgood G, Naugler S. Surgical education: Attitudes toward animal use in teaching surgery at Louisiana State University. J Vet Med Educ 29:50-55, 2002.
34. Adams DR. The teaching of comparative gross anatomy through the prosection approach. J Vet Med Educ 1:16-17, 1974.
35. Hauptman JG, Stanley BJ, Walshaw R. The fourth-year veterinary student as a "teaching assistant" in the operative surgery laboratory. J Vet Med Educ 28:145-147, 2001.
36. Michigan State University. Instructional Media Center 〈http://www.msu.edu/unit/imc/〉. Accessed 08/02/05.
37. Hardin DK, Groce AW, Bolinger DR. A portable milking parlor mock-up for the instruction of milking machine operation and/or evaluation. J Vet Med Educ 16:55-56, 1989.
38. DeYoung DJ, Richardson DC. Teaching the principles of internal fixation of fractures with plastic bone models. J Vet Med Educ 14:30-31, 1987.
39. Van Camp SD, Hunt EL, Whitacre MD. Teaching with a standing bovine cadaver: An alternative approach. J Vet Med Educ 15:56-57, 1988.
40. Hansen BD. An alternative model for teaching emergency procedures. J Vet Med Educ 30:270-273, 2003.
41. Hawkins EC, Hansen B, Bunch BL. Use of animation-enhanced video clips for teaching abnormal breathing patterns. J Vet Med Educ 30:73-77, 2003.
42. Smeak DD, Beck ML, Shaffer CA, Gregg CG. Evaluation of video tape and a simulator for instruction of basic surgical skills. Vet Surg 20:30-36, 1991.
43. Smeak DD, Hill LN, Beck ML, Shaffer CA, Birchard SJ. Evaluation of an autotutorial-simulator program for instruction of hollow organ closure. Vet Surg 23:519-528, 1994.
44. Masterson MA, Welker B, Midla LT, Meiring RW, Hoblet KH. Use of a non-traditional university ambulatory practice to teach large animal medicine. J Vet Med Educ 31:380-383, 2004.
45. Provo JA, Lamar CH. Prosection as an approach to student-centered learning in veterinary gross anatomy. J Am Vet Med Assoc 206:158-161, 1995.
46. Loew FM. Tufts develops alternative program for teaching surgery. J Am Vet Med Assoc 195:868-870, 1989.
47. Pavletic MM, Schwartz A, Berg J, Knapp D. An assessment of the outcome of the alternative medical and surgical laboratory program at Tufts University. J Am Vet Med Assoc 205:97-100, 1994.
48. Kumar AM, Murtaugh R, Brown D, Ballas T, Clancy E, Patronek G. Client donation program for acquiring dogs and cats to teach veterinary gross anatomy. J Vet Med Educ 28:73-77, 2001.
49. Cohen-Salter C, Folmer-Brown S, Hogrefe KM, Brosnahan M. A model euthanasia workshop: One class's experience at Tufts University. J Vet Med Educ 31:72-75, 2004.
50. Kinnamon KK, Holborow GS, Simmonds RC, Sheridan MN. A method of preparing veterinary gross anatomy specimens: Multi-year holdings and use requires no refrigeration. J Vet Med Educ 19:108-110, 1992.
51. Shmarak AD. Videocassette as a prime delivery system for the teaching of surgery. J Vet Med Educ 2(1):46-47, 1975.
52. Hart LA, Anderson DC, Zasloff R. Alternatives to the use of live animals in veterinary school curricula. Humane Innovations and Alternatives 7:499-503, 1993.
53. Zasloff RL. Animal alternatives in veterinary medical education. In Vitro Toxicology 8:109-111, 1995.
54. Magliano D, Hayes R, Kasper J, Guinan M. Computer-Assisted Learning Facility: Products. University of California, Davis, School of Veterinary Medicine 〈http://calf.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/〉. Accessed 07/22/05.
55. Wood, MW. UC Center for Animal Alternatives. University of California, Davis 〈http://www.vetmed. ucdavis.edu/Animal_Alternatives/main.htm〉. Accessed 07/24/05.
56. Dewhurst D. Computer-based alternatives to using animals in teaching physiology and pharmacology to undergraduate students. Altern Lab Anim 32(suppl. 1):517-520, 2004.
57. Modell JH, Cantwell S, Hardcastle J, Robertson S, Pablo L. Using the human patient simulator to educate students of veterinary medicine. J Vet Med Educ 29:111-116, 2002.
58. Calvert CA. The heart sound simulator as an aid to teaching cardiac auscultation in the dog. J Vet Med Educ 15:11-13, 1988.
59. Crowell WA, Tyler DE, Smith FG. Interactive videodisc programs: Production and use in the diagnostic pathology block. J Vet Med Educ 17:50-51, 1990.
60. Allen SW, Chambers JN. Computer-assisted instruction of fundamental surgical motor skills. J Vet Med Educ 24:2-5, 1997.
61. Jacobs GJ, Cornelius L, Sherding R, Calvert CA, Eades S, Burrow MF. Interpretation of endoscopic images of the gastrointestinal tract following electronic transmission using an interactive videoconferencing system. J Vet Med Educ 24:52-55, 1997.
62. Jacobs GJ, Calvert CA, Eades S, Burrow MF. Transmission and interpretation of cardiac medical images using a desktop audiovisual teleconferencing system. J Vet Med Educ 24:56-62, 1997.
63. Baillie S, Mellor DJ, Brewster SA, Reid SWJ. Integrating a bovine rectal palpation simulator into an undergraduate veterinary curriculum. J Vet Med Educ 32:79-85, 2005.
64. Holmberg DL, Cockshutt JR, Basher AWP. Use of a dog abdominal surrogate for teaching surgery. J Vet Med Educ 20:61-62, 1993.
65. Croy BA, Dobson H. Radiology as a tool for teaching anatomy. J Vet Med Educ 30:264-269, 2003.
66. Musselman EE, Grimes GM. Teaching recognition of normal and abnormal heart sounds using computer-assisted instruction. J Vet Med Educ 3:9-12, 1976.
67. Greenfield CL, Johnson AL, Arends MW, Wroblewski AJ. Development of parenchymal abdominal organ models for use in teaching veterinary soft tissue surgery. Vet Surg 22:357-362, 1993.
68. Greenfield CL, Johnson AL, Smith CW, Marretta SM, Farmer JA, Klippert L. Integrating alternative models into the existing surgical curriculum. J Vet Med Educ 21:23-27, 1994.
69. Greenfield CL, Johnson AL, Klippert L, Hungerford LL. Veterinary student expectations and outcomes assessment of a small animal surgical curriculum. J Am Vet Med Assoc 206:778-782, 1995.
70. Greenfield CL, Johnson AL, Schaeffer DJ, Hungerford LL. Comparison of surgical skills of veterinary students trained using models or live animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 206:1840-1845, 1995.
71. Greenfield CL, Johnson AL, Schaeffer DJ. Frequency of use of various procedures, skills, and areas of knowledge among veterinarians in private small animal exclusive or predominant practice and proficiency expected of new veterinary school graduates. J Am Vet Med Assoc 224:1780-1787, 2004.
72. Greenfield CL, Johnson AL, Schaeffer DJ. Influence of demographic variables on the frequency of use of various procedures, skills, and areas of knowledge among veterinarians in private small animal exclusive or predominant practice and proficiency expected of new veterinary school graduates. J Am Vet Med Assoc 226:38-48, 2005.
73. Johnson AL, Farmer JA. Evaluation of traditional and alternative models in psychomotor laboratories for veterinary surgery. J Vet Med Educ 16:11-14, 1989.
74. Johnson AL, Farmer JA. Teaching veterinary surgery in the operating room. J Vet Med Educ 17:10-12, 1990.
75. Johnson AL, Harari J, Lincoln J, Farmer JA, Korvidk D. Bone models of pathological conditions used for teaching veterinary orthopedic surgery. J Vet Med Educ 17:13-15, 1990.
76. Johnson AL, Greenfield CL, Klippert L, Hungerford LL, Farmer JA, Siegel A. Frequency of procedure and proficiency expected of new veterinary school graduates with regard to small animal surgical procedures in private practice. J Am Vet Med Assoc 202:1068-1071, 1993.
77. Walshaw S. Incorporating animal alternatives in a training programme in laboratory animal care and use. Altern Lab Anim (suppl. 1):549-551, 2004.
78. Weigel JP, Rohrbach BW, Monroe AC, Warner S. Evaluation of undergraduate orthopedic surgical training by survey of graduate and employer veterinarians. J Vet Med Educ 19:2-5, 1992.
79. Stuart MD, Henry, RW. Plastinated specimens can improve the conceptual quality of biology labs. Am Biol Teach 64:130-134, 2002.
80. Hartmann EP. Survey of the surgical curricula of veterinary colleges. J Vet Med Educ 17:8-10, 1990.
81. White KK, Wheaton LG, Greene SA. Curriculum change related to live animal use: A four-year surgical curriculum. J Vet Med Educ 19:6-10, 1992.
82. College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University. Image data base 〈http://imagedb.vetmed. wsu.edu〉. Accessed 08/02/05.
83. Holden C. Anatomy classes face gross shortage. Science 299:1309, 2003.
84. Aboud E, Suarez CE, Al-Mefry O, Yasargil MG. New alternative to animal models for surgical training. Altern Lab Anim 32(suppl. 1):501-507, 2004.
85. Hart LA. Animal alternatives in precollege education: When? In Vitro Toxicology 8:213-214, 1995.
86. Hart LA, Wood MW, Massey A, Smith M. Uses of animals and alternatives in pre-college education in the United States: Need for leadership on educational resources and guidelines. Altern Lab Anim 32(suppl. 1): 485-489, 2004.