Use of live animals in the curricula of U.S. medical schools: Survey results from 2001

Academic Medicine

Volumn 77, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1147-1149

  Hansen, Lawrence A ^a   Boss, Gerry R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL USE; ARTICLE; CAT; CURRICULUM; DOG; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; NONHUMAN; PHARMACOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SURGERY; SWINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036847043     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00018     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Fawver AL, Branch CE, Trentham L, Robertson BT, Beckett SD. A comparison of interactive videodisc instruction with live animal laboratories. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:511-4.
2. Samsel RW, Schmidt GA, Hall JB, Wood LDH, Shroff SG, Schumacher PT. Cardiovascular physiology teaching: Computer simulations versus animal demonstrations. Am J Physiol. 1994; (Advances in Physiology Education):536-46.
3. Ammons SW. Use of live animals in the curricula of U.S. medical schools in 1994. Acad Med. 1995;70:739-43.
4. U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. Alternatives to Animal Use in Research, Testing, and Education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1986.
5. Barnard ND, Stolz J, Baron L. Use of and alternatives to animals in laboratory courses at U.S. medical school. J Med Educ. 1988;63:720-2.
6. Kelly DE. Use of and alternatives to animals in laboratory courses at U.S. medical schools. Physiologist. 1992;35:291-3.