Bank runs and investment decisions revisited

Journal of Monetary Economics

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 217-232

  Ennis, Huberto M ^a   Keister, Todd ^b  

^a FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO AUTÓNOMO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Banking panics; Investment; Liquidity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644638664     PISSN: 03043932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2004.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Boyd, J.H., S. Kwak, B.D. Smith, 2004. The real output losses associated with modern banking crises. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, forthcoming.
2. B. Champ B.D. Smith S.D. Williamson Currency elasticity and banking panics: Theory and evidence Canadian Journal of Economics 29 1996 828-864
3. Cooper, R., Ross, T.W., 1991. Bank runs: Liquidity and incentives, NBER Working Paper #3921, November.
4. R. Cooper T.W. Ross Bank runs: Liquidity costs and investment distortions Journal of Monetary Economics 41 1998 27-38
5. D.W. Diamond P.H. Dybvig Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity Journal of Political Economy 91 1983 401-419
6. H.M. Ennis T. Keister Economic growth, liquidity, and bank runs Journal of Economic Theory 109 2003 220-245
7. Ennis, H.M., Keister, T., 2005. Government policy and the probability of coordination failures. European Economic Review 49, 939-973.
8. S. Freeman Banking as the provision of liquidity Journal of Business 61 1988 45-64
9. Gaytan, A., Ranciere, R., 2003. Banks, liquidity crises and economic growth. Mimeo.
10. E.J. Green P. Lin Implementing efficient allocations in a model of financial intermediation Journal of Economic Theory 109 2003 1-23
11. J. Peck K. Shell Equilibrium bank runs Journal of Political Economy 111 2003 103-123
12. N. Wallace Another attempt to explain an illiquid banking system: The Diamond and Dybvig model with sequential service taken seriously Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 12 Fall 1988 3-16
13. N. Wallace A banking model in which partial suspension is best Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 14 Fall 1990 11-23