How regionalization can be a pillar of a more effective World Trade Organization

Journal of World Trade

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 671-699

  Zahrnt, Valentin ^a  

^a GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEGOTIATION PROCESS; REGIONALIZATION; TRADE POLICY; WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION;

EID: 33644631720     PISSN: 10116702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54648/trad2005040     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Bagwell, Kyle and Robert W. Staiger (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
2. Baldwin, Richard E., Daniel Cohen, André Sapir and Anthony Venables (eds) (1999), Market Integration, Regionalism and the Global Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
3. Bhagwati, Jagdish (2001), "After Seattle: Free Trade and the WTO", in Roger B. Porter, Pierre Sauvé, Arvind Subramanian and Americo B. Zampetti (eds), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the New Millennium (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press), pp. 50-62.
4. Bhagwati, Jagdish, Pravin Krishna and Arvind Panagariya (eds) (1999), Trading Blocs: Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Preferential Trade Agreements (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
5. Biermann, Frank (2001), The Rising Tide of Green Unilateralism in World Trade Law: Options for Reconciling the Emerging North-South Conflict, 35 Journal of World Trade 3 (June), pp. 421-448.
6. Blackhurst, Richard and David Hartridge (2004), Improving the Capacity of WTO Institutions to Fulfil Their Mandate, 7 Journal of International Economic Law 3, pp. 705-716.
7. Charnovitz, Steve (2002), Trade Law and Global Governance (London: Cameron May).
8. Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2001), Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change, 55 International Organization 3, pp. 553-588.
9. Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2003), "Going Native" in Europe: Theorizing Social Interaction in European Institutions, 36 Comparative Political Studies 1/2, pp. 209-231.
10. Cho, Sungjoon (2004), A Bridge Too Far: The Fall of the Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference in Cancún and the Future of Trade Constitution, 7 Journal of International Economic Law 2, pp. 219-244.
11. Clive, George and Colin Kirkpatrick (2004), Trade and Development: Assessing the Impact of Trade Liberalisation on Sustainable Development, 38 Journal of World Trade 3 (June), pp. 441-469.
12. Drahos, Peter (2003), When the Weak Bargain with the Strong: Negotiations in the World Trade Organization, 8 International Negotiation 1, pp. 79-109.
13. Dunning, John H. (2000), The Future of the WTO: A Socio-Relational Challenge?, 1 Review of International Political Economy 3, pp. 475-483.
14. Dunoff, Jeffrey L. (1999), The Death of the Trade Regime, 10 European Journal of International Law 4, pp. 733-762.
15. Egeberg, Morten (1999), Transcending Intergovernmentalism? Identity and Role Perceptions of National Officials in EU Decision-Making, 6 Journal of European Public Policy 3, pp. 456-474.
16. Eriksen, Erik O. and John E. Fossum (2000), "Post-National Integration", in Erik O. Eriksen and John E. Possum (eds), Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation? (London: Routledge), pp. 1-28.
17. Esty, Daniel C. (2002), The World Trade Organization's Legitimacy Crisis, 1 World Trade Review 1, pp. 7-22.
18. Ford, Jane (2002), A Social Theory of Trade Regime Change: GATT to WTO, 4 International Studies Review 3, pp. 115-138.
19. Freund, Caroline (2003), Reciprocity in Free Trade Agreements, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3061 (Washington, D.C.: World Bank).
20. Fudenberg, Drew and Jean Tirole (1991), Game Theory (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
21. Haas, Peter M. (1992), Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination, 46 International Organization 1, pp. 1-35.
22. Heiskanen, Veijo (2004), The Regulatory Philosophy of International Trade Law, 38 Journal of World Trade 1 (February), pp. 1-36.
23. Hoekman, Bernard M. (2002), Strengthening the Global Trade Architecture for Development, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2757 (Washington, D.C.: World Bank).
24. Hoekman, Bernard M. and Michel M. Kostecki (2001), The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press).
25. Hooghe, Liesbet (1999), Supranational Activists or Intergovernmental Agents? Explaining the Orientations of Senior Commission Officials Toward European Integration, 32 Comparative Political Studies 4, pp. 435-463.
26. Howse, Robert (2002), From Politics to Technocracy - and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trade Regime, 96 American Journal of International Law 1, pp. 94-117.
27. Howse, Robert and Kalypso Nicolaidis (2003), Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity, 16 Governance 1, pp. 73-94.
28. Jackson, John H. (1997), The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations (2nd edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
29. Jackson, John H. (2002), Afterword: The Linkage Problem - Comments on Five Texts, 96 American Journal of International Law 1, pp. 118-125.
30. Joerges, Christian and Jürgen Neyer (1998), "Von intergourvernementalem Verhandeln zur deliberativen Politik: Gründe and Chancen für eine Konstitutionalisierung der europäischen Komitologie", in Beate Kohler-Koch (ed.), Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag), pp. 207-234.
31. Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye Jr. (2001), "Between Centralization and Fragmentation: The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy", in Roger B. Porter, Pierre Sauvé, Arvind Subramanian and Americo B. Zampetti (eds), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the New Millennium (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press), pp. 264-294.
32. Kohler-Koch, Beate and Jakob Edler (1998), "Ideendiskurs and Vergemeinschaftung: Erschliessung transnationaler Räume durch europäisches Regieren", in Beate Kohler-Koch (ed.) Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag), pp. 169-206.
33. Leebron, David W. (2002), Linkages, 96 American Journal of International Law 1, pp. 5-27.
34. Lewis, Jeffrey (1998), Is the "Hard Bargaining" Image of the Council Misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Elections Directive, 36 Journal of Common Market Studies 4, pp. 479-504.
35. Limao, Nuno (2002), Are Preferential Trade Agreements with Non-trade Objectives a Stumbling Bloc for Multilateral Liberalization?, Center for International Economics Working Paper 02-02.
36. Meunier, Sophie (2000), What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU-US Trade Negotiations, 54 International Organization 1, pp. 103-135.
37. OECD (2003), Regionalism and the Multilateral Trading System (Paris: OECD).
38. Ostry, Silvia (2001), "World Trade Organization: Institutional Design for Better Governance", in Roger B. Porter, Pierre Sauvé, Arvind Subramanian and Americo B. Zampetti (eds), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the New Millennium (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press), pp. 361-380.
39. Perroni, Carlo and John Whalley (2000), The New Regionalism: Trade Liberalization or Insurance?, 33 Canadian Journal of Economics 1, pp. 1-24.
40. Raghavan, Chakravarthi (2000), After Seattle, World Trade System Faces Uncertain Future, 7 Review of International Political Economy 3, pp. 495-504.
41. Ruggie, John G. (1992), Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution, 46 International Organization 3, pp. 561-598.
42. Safrin, Sabrina (2002), Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements, 96 American Journal of International Law 3, pp. 606-628.
43. Scharpf, Fritz W. (1999), Regieren in Europa:Effektiv und Demokratisch? (Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag).
44. Shaffer, Gregory (2001), The World Trade Organization under Challenge: Democracy and the Law and Politics of the WTO's Treatment of Trade and Environment Matters, 25 Harvard Environmental Law Review 1, pp. 1-93.
45. Shaffer, Gregory (2004), Parliamentary Oversight of WTO Ruk-Making: The Political, Normative, and Practical Contexts, 7 Journal of International Economic Law 3, pp. 629-654.
46. Singh, J. P. (2000), Weak Powers and Globalism: The Impact of Plurality on Weak-Strong Negotiations in the International Economy, 5 International Negotiation 3, pp. 449-484.
47. Steinberg, Richard H. (2002), In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO, 56 International Organization 2, pp. 339-374.
48. Wendt, Alexander (1999), Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
49. World Bank (2000), Trade Blocs (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
50. World Bank (2004), Global Economic Prospects: Trade, Regionalism and Development (Washington, D.C.: World Bank).
51. Zahmt, Valentin (2005a), Enhancing the Internal Legitimacy of WTO Negotiations: Representation of Member States through Common Interest Groups and Integrated Regions, unpublished paper.
52. Zahrnt, Valentin (2005b), Die Zukunft globalen Regierens: Herausforderungen und Reformen am Beispiel der Welthandelsorganisation (Stuttgart: Lucius und Lucius).
53. Zampetti, Americo B. (2001), "A Rough Map of Challenges to the Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium", in Roger B. Porter, Pierre Sauvé, Arvind Subramanian and Americo B. Zampetti (eds), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the New Millennium (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press), pp. 34-49.