Comparing onsite and offsite methods for measuring norms for trail impacts

Environmental Management

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 567-578

  Kim, Sang Oh ^a   Shelby, Bo ^b  

^a Chonnam National University   (South Korea)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparability; Norms; Offsite; Onsite; Photo; Trail impacts

Indexed keywords

PHOTOGRAPHY; REGIONAL PLANNING; SOILS;

COMPARABILITY; NORMS; OFFSITE; ONSITE; PHOTO; TRAIL IMPACTS;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; SOIL EROSION; SURVEYING; TOURISM;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FIELD EXPERIMENT; KOREA; PHOTOGRAPHY; RECREATION; SOIL ANALYSIS; STANDARD;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DATA COLLECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMANS; KOREA; PHOTOGRAPHY; RECREATION; TREES;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; KOREA; KWANGJU [SOUTH KOREA]; MUDEUNG MOUNTAIN PROVINCIAL PARK; SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 33644617184     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0317-1     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Brunson, M., and B. Shelby. 1992. Assessing recreational and scenic quality: How does new forestry rate? Journal of Forestry 90:37-41.
2. Carls, E. G. 1974. The effects of people and man-induced conditions on preferences for outdoor recreation landscapes. Journal of Leisure Research 6:113-124.
3. Cole, D. N., and W. P. Stewart. 2002. Variability of user-based evaluative standards for backcountry encounters. Leisure Sciences 24:313-324.
4. Daniel, T. C., and M. M. Meitner. 2001. Representational validity of landscape visualizations: The effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21:61-72.
5. Daniel, T. C., and R. S. Boster. 1976. Measuring landscape aesthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. Research paper RM-167. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
6. Freimund, W. A., J. J. Vaske, M. P. Donnelly, and T. A. Miller. 2002. Using video surveys to access dispersed backcountry visitors' norms. Leisure Sciences 24:349-362.
7. Graefe, A. R., F. R. Kuss, and J. J. Vaske. 1986. Recreation impacts and carrying capacity: A visitor impact management framework. Washington, DC, National Parks and Conservation Association.
8. Heberlein, T. A., and G. Alfano. 1983. Social carrying capacity for boating at the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore (Draft report to the National Park Service). University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
9. Hendee, J. C., and R. W. Harris. 1970. Forester's perceptions of wilderness user attitudes and preferences. Journal of Forestry 68:759-762.
10. Hetherington, J., T. C. Daniel, and T. C. Brown. 1994. Is motion more important than it sounds? The medium of presentation in environmental perception research. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13:283-291.
11. Hull, R. B., and W. P. Stewart. 1992. Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgements. Journal of Environmental Psychology 12:101-114.
12. Inglis, G. J., V. I. Johnson, and F. Ponte. 1999. Crowding norms in marine settings: A case study of snorkeling on the Great Barrier Reef. Environmental Management 24:369-381.
13. Jackson, J. M. 1965. Structural characteristics of norms. Pages 301-309 in I. D. Steiner and M. F. Fishbein (eds.), Current studies in social psychology. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
14. Kellomäki, S., and R. Savolainen. 1984. The scenic value of the forest landscape as assessed in the field and the laboratory. Landscape Planning 11:97-107.
15. Kim, S. O. 1999. Suggestions for efficient management of trails in Mudeungsan. Mudeungsan 6:4-5.
16. Kim, S. O., and B. Shelby. 1998. Norms for behavior and conditions in two national park campgrounds in Korea. Environmental Management 22:277-285.
17. Kim, S. O., C. H. Lee, and B. Shelby. 2003. Utilization of photographs in determining impact indicators for trail management. Environmental Management 32:282-289.
18. Kim, S. O., and K. I. Oh. 1998. Evaluation of the present managerial conditions based on the established social and ecological impact standards and some suggestions: In Moodeung-san Provincial Park. The Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 25:107-122.
19. Manfredo, M. L. 1984. The comparability of onsite and offsite measures of recreation needs. Journal of Leisure Research 16:245-249.
20. Manning, R. E. 1999. Studies in outdoor recreation. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, 374 pp.
21. Manning, R. E., and D. W. Lime. 1996. Crowding and carrying capacity in the national park system: Toward a social science research agenda. Pages 27-66 in D. W. Lime (eds.), Congestion and crowding in the national park system: Guidelines for management and research (miscellaneous publication 86-1996). Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.
22. Manning, R. E., D. W. Lime, and M. Hof. 1996a. Social carrying capacity of natural areas: Theory and application in the U.S. national parks. Natural Areas Journal 16:118-127.
23. Manning, R. E., D. W. Lime, W. Freimund, and D. Pitt. 1996b. Crowding norms at frontcountry sites: A visual approach to setting standards of quality. Leisure Sciences 18:39-59.
24. Manning, R. E., S. Lawson, P. Newman, D. Laven, and W. Valliere. 2002. Methodological issues in measuring crowding-related norms in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences 24:339-348.
25. Manning, R. E., and W. A. Freimund. 2004. Use of visual research methods to measure standards of quality for parks and outdoor recreation. Journal of Leisure Research 36:557-579.
26. Manning, R. E., W. Vallierer, B. Wang, and C. Jacobi. 1999. Crowding norms: Alternative measurement approaches. Leisure Sciences 21:97-115.
27. Martinson, K., and B. Shelby. 1992. Encounter and proximity norms for salmon anglers in California and New Zealand. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:559-567.
28. Mudeung-Mountain Provincial Park Management Office. 1996. The present conditions of Mudeung-Mountain Natural Park. Pages 5-16 In Mudeungsan Sarang. Association of Mudeungsan Protection.
29. Needham, M. D., and R. B. Rollins. 2005. Interest group standards for recreation and tourism impacts at ski areas in the summer. Tourism Management 26:1-13.
30. Peterson, G. L. 1967. A model of preference: Quantitative analysis of the perception of the visual appearance of residential neighborhoods. Journal of Regional Science 7:19-31.
31. Peterson, G. L. 1974. A comparison of the sentiments and perceptions of wilderness managers and canoeists in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Journal of Leisure Research 6:194-206.
32. Peterson, G. L., and D. W. Lime. 1973. Two sources of bias in the measurement of human response to the wilderness environment. Journal of Leisure Research 5:66-73.
33. Roggenbuck, J. W., D. R. Williams, and A. Watson. 1993. Defining acceptable conditions in wilderness. Environmental Management 17:187-197.
34. Roggenbuck, J. W., D. R. Williams, S. P. Bangev, and D. J. Dean. 1991. River float trip encounter norms: Questioning the use of the social norms concept. Journal of Leisure Research 23:133-153.
35. Schreyer, R., D. W. Lime, and D. R. Williams. 1984. Characterizing the influence of past experience on recreation behavior. Journal of Leisure Research 16:34-50.
36. Shafer, E. L., J. F. Hamilton, and E. A. Schmidt. 1969. Natural landscape preference: A predictive model. Journal of Leisure Research 1:1-19.
37. Shafer, E. L., and T. A. Richards. 1974. A comparison of viewer reactions to outdoor scenes and photographs of those scenes. Research paper NE-302. USDA Forest Serwvice, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania.
38. Shelby, B. 1981. Encounter norms in backcountry settings: Studies of three rivers. Journal of Leisure Research 13:129-138.
39. Shelby, B., and B. Shindler. 1992. Interest group standards for ecological impact at wilderness campsites. Leisure Sciences 14:17-27.
40. Shelby, B., and D. Whittaker. 1995. Virgin River instream flow assessment: Recreation and aesthetics. Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State Office, Phoenix, Arizona.
41. Shelby, B., and J. J. Vaske. 1991. Using normative data to develop evaluative standards for resource management: A comment on three recent papers. Journal of Leisure Research 23:173-187.
42. Shelby, B., J. Vaske, and R. Harris. 1988. User standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. Journal of Leisure Research 20:245-256.
43. Shelby, B., J. Vaske, and T. A. Heberlein. 1989. Comparative analysis of crowding in multiple locations: Results from fifteen years of research. Leisure Sciences 11:269-291.
44. Shelby, B., and R. Harris. 1985. Comparing methods for determining visitor evaluations of ecological impacts: Site visits, photographs, and written descriptions. Journal of Leisure Research 17:57-67.
45. Shelby, B., and T. A. Heberlein. 1986. Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, 164 pp.
46. Shuttleworth, S. 1980. The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. Journal of Environmental Management 11:61-76.
47. Stankey, G. H., D. N. Cole, R. C. Lucas, M. E. Petersen, and S. S. Frissell. 1985. The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning (Report INT-176). USDA Forest Service, Ogden, Utah.
48. Stewart, W., and R. Hull. 1992. Satisfaction of what? Post hoc versus real-time construct validity. Leisure Sciences 14:195-209.
49. Taylor, J. G., K. J. Czarnowski, N. R. Sexton, and S. Flick. 1995. The importance of water to Rocky Mountain National Park visitors: An adaptation of visitor-employed photography to natural resources management. Journal of Applied Recreation Research 20:61-85.
50. Vaske, J. J., B. Shelby, A. R. Graefe, and T. A. Heberlein. 1986. Backcountry encounter norms: Theory, method and empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research 18:137-153.
51. Vaske, J. J., and M. P. Donnelly. 1988. Normative evaluations of wildlife management: A comparison of three publics. Paper presented at the annual congress of National Parks and Recreation Association, Indianapolis, Indiana.
52. Vaske, J. J., M. P. Donnelly, and B. Shelby. 1993. Establishing management standards: Selected examples of the normative approach. Environmental Management 17:629-643.
53. Vaske, J. J., M. P. Donnelly, W. A. Freimund, and T. Miller. 1995. The 1995 Gwaii Haanas visitor survey. HDNRU rep. no. 26. Human Dimensions in Natural Resources Unit, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
54. Vaske, J. J., M. P. Donnelly, and T. Heberlein. 1980. Perceptions of crowding and resource quality by early and more recent visitors. Leisure Sciences 3:367-381.
55. Whittaker, D., and B. Shelby. 1988. Types of norms for recreation impacts: Extending the social norms concept. Journal of Leisure Research 20:261-273.
56. Whittaker, D., and B. Shelby. 1992. Developing good standards: Criteria, characteristics, and sources. Pages 6-12 in A workshop proceedings, defining wilderness quality: The role of standards in wilderness management. Gen. tech. rep. PNW-GTR-305. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
57. Whittaker, D., and B. Shelby. 2002. Evaluating instream flows for recreation: Applying the structural norm approach to biophysical conditions. Leisure Sciences 24:363-374.
58. Williams, D. R., J. W. Roggenbuck, and S. Bange. 1991. The effect of norm-encounter compatibility on crowding perceptions, experience and behavior in river recreation settings. Journal of Leisure Research 23:154-172.
59. Zube, E. H., D. G. Pitt, and T. W. Anderson. 1975. Perception and prediction of scenic resource values of the northeast. Pages 151-167 in E. Zube, R. Brush, J. Fabos (eds.), Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions and resources. Dowden. Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.