Utilization of photographs for determining impact indicators for trail management

Environmental Management

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 282-289

  Kim, Sang Oh ^a   Chang, Heon Lee ^a   Shelby, Bo ^b  

^a Chonbuk National University   (South Korea)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Impact indicator; Photographs; Provincial park; Trail management conditions

Indexed keywords

PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PHOTOINTERPRETATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; ROCKS; SURVEYS;

IMPACT INDICATORS; PHOTO SURVEY METHODS (PSM); RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; TRAILS;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PHOTOGRAPH; PLANNING METHOD; PROTECTED AREA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PHOTOGRAPHY; PLANT ROOT; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ROCK; SOIL; SOUTH KOREA; TECHNIQUE; WOOD; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KOREA; METHODOLOGY; RECREATION; TREE;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; KOREA; KWANGJU [SOUTH KOREA]; MUDEUNG MOUNTAIN PROVINCIAL PARK; SOUTH KOREA;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DATA COLLECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; KOREA; PHOTOGRAPHY; RECREATION; TREES;

EID: 1342327484     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-2925-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Brunson, M. W. 1991. Effects of traditional and "new forestry" practice on recreational and scenic quality of managed forests. PhD dissertation. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
2. Buhyoff, G. J., and W. A. Leuschner. 1978. Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. Forest Science 24:424-432.
3. Buhyoff, G. J., J. D. Wellman, H. Harvey, and R. A. Fraser. 1978. Landscape architects' interpretations of people's landscape preferences. Journal of Environmental Management 6:255-262.
4. Buhyoff, G. J., J. D. Wellman, and T. C. Daniel. 1982. Predicting scenic quality for mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas. Forest Science 28:827-838.
5. Carls, E. G. 1974. The effects of people and man-induced conditions on preferences for outdoor recreation landscapes. Journal of Leisure Research 6:113-124.
6. Daniel, T. C., and Boster R. S. 1976. Measuring landscape aesthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
7. Dunn, M. C. 1976. Landscape with photographs: Testing the preference approach to landscape evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management 11:15-26.
8. Graefe, A. R., F. R. Kuss, and J. J. Vaske. 1986. Recreation impacts and carrying capacity: A visitor impact management framework. National Parks and Conservation Association, Washington, DC.
9. Hendee, J. C., and R. W. Harris. 1970. Forester's perceptions of wilderness user attitudes and preferences. Journal of Forestry 68:759-762.
10. Inglis, G. J., V. I. Johnson, and F. Ponte. 1999. Crowding norms in marine settings: A case study of snorkeling on the Great Barrier Reef. Environmental Management 24:369-381.
11. Jackson, R. H., L. E. Hudman, and J. L. England. 1978. Assessment of the environmental impact of high voltage transmission lines. Journal of Environmental Management 6:153-170.
12. Jones, G. R., J. Ady, and B. Gray. 1976. Scenic and recreational highway study for the State of Washington. Landscape Planning 3:151-302.
13. Kuss, F. R., A. R. Graefe, and J. J. Vaske. 1990. Visitor impact management: A review of research. National Parks and Conservation Association, Washington, DC.
14. Latimer, D. A., H. Hogo, and T. C. Daniel. 1981. The effects of atmospheric optical conditions on perceived scenic beauty. Atmospheric Environment 15:1865-1874.
15. Lien, J. N., and G. J. Buhyoff. 1986. Extension of visual quality models for urban forests. Journal of Environmental Management 22:245-254.
16. Malm, W., K. Kelley, J. Molenar, and T. C. Daniel. 1981. Human perception of visual air quality (uniform haze). Atmospheric Environment 15:1875-1890.
17. Manning, R. E., and Lime D. W. 1996. Crowding and carrying capacity in the National Park System: Toward a social science research agenda. In (ed.), D. W. Lime., Congestion and crowding in the national park system: guidelines for management and research. Misc. Pub. 86-1996. Department of Forest Resources and Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota. St. Paul, Minnesota.
18. Manning, R. E., D. W. Lime, W. A. Freimund, and D. G. Pitt. 1996. Crowding norms at frontcountry sites: a visual approach to setting standards of quality. Leisure Sciences 18:39-59.
19. Manning, R. E., W. A. Valliere, B. Wang, and C. Jacobi. 1999. Crowding norms: alternative measurement approaches. Leisure Sciences 21:97-115.
20. Peterson, G. L. 1967. A model of preference: quantitative analysis of the perception of the visual appearance of residential neighborhoods. Journal of Regional Science 7:19-31.
21. Peterson, G. L. 1974. A comparison of the sentiments and perceptions of wilderness managers and canoeists in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Journal of Leisure Research 6:194-206.
22. Rutherford, W., and E. L. Shafer. 1969. Selection cuts increased natural beauty in two Adirondack forest stands. Journal of Forestry 67:415-419.
23. Schroeder, H. W., and T. C. Daniel. 1980. Predicting the scenic quality of forest road corridors. Environment and Behavior 12:349-366.
24. Schroeder, H., and T. C. Daniel. 1981. Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes. Forest Science 27:71-80.
25. Schroeder, H. W., and W. N. Cannon. 1983. The esthetic contribution of trees to residential streets in Ohio Towns. Journal of Arboriculture 9:237-243.
26. Shafer, E. L., and Richards T. A. 1974. A comparison of viewer reactions to outdoor scenes and photographs of those scenes. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-302. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania.
27. Shafer, E. L., J. F. Hamilton, and E. A. Schimidt. 1969. Natural landscape preference: a predictive model. Journal of Leisure Research 1:1-19.
28. Shelby, B. 1981. Encounter norms in backcountry settings: Studies of three rivers. Journal of Leisure Research 13:129-138.
29. Shelby, B., and R. Harris. 1985. Comparing methods for determining visitor evaluations of ecological impacts: site visits, photographs, and written descriptions. Journal of Leisure Research 17:57-67.
30. Shelby, B., and T. A. Heberlein. 1986. Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon 164.
31. Shelby, B., and B. Shindler. 1992. Interest group standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. Leisure Sciences 14:17-27.
32. Shelby, B., J. J. Vaske, and R. Harris. 1988. User standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. Journal of Leisure Research 20:245-256.
33. Shuttleworth, S. 1980. The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. Journal of Environmental Management 11:61-76.
34. Stankey, G. H., Cole D. N., Lucas R. C., Peterson M. E., and Frissell S. S. 1985. The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning. Report INT-176. USDA Forest Service, Ogden, Utah.
35. Vaske, J. J., B. Shelby, A. R. Graefe, and T. A. Heberlein. 1986. Backcountry encounter norms: theory, method, and empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research 18:137-153.
36. Vodak, M. C., P. L. Roberts, J. D. Wellman, and G. J. Buhyoff. 1985. Scenic impacts of eastern hardwood management. Forest Science 31:289-302.
37. Walsh, R. G., F. A. Ward, and J. P. Olienyk. 1989. Recreational demand for trees in national forests. Journal of Environmental Management 28:225-268.
38. Whittaker, D. 1992. Selecting indicators: Which impacts matter more? In A workshop proceedings, defining wilderness quality: The role of standards in wilderness of management. Gen. Tech. Rep. NW- GTR-305, USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 13-22.
39. Whittaker, D., and Shelby B. 1992. Developing good standards: criteria, characteristics, and sources. In A workshop proceedings, defining wilderness quality: The role of standards in wilderness of management. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-305. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 6-12.
40. Zube, E. H. 1973. Rating the everyday rural landscape of the Northeastern U.S. Landscape Architecture 63:371-375.