Mating patterns and demography in the tristylous daffodil Narcissus triandrus

Heredity

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 262-270

  Hodgins, K A ^a   Barrett, S C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biparental inbreeding; Demography; Mating system; Narcissus triandrus; Outcrossing rates; Tristyly

Indexed keywords

HERB; INBREEDING; OUTCROSSING; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION SIZE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CROSS BREEDING; DEMOGRAPHY; FLOWER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; INBREEDING; NARCISSUS; POPULATION GENETICS;

CROSSES, GENETIC; DEMOGRAPHY; FLOWERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; INBREEDING; NARCISSUS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

NARCISSUS; NARCISSUS PSEUDONARCISSUS; NARCISSUS TRIANDRUS;

EID: 33644608041     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800792     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ågren J (1996). Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology 77: 1779-1790.
2. Baker AM, Thompson JD, Barrett SCH (2000). Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. II. Fitness comparisons between style morphs. Heredity 84: 514-524.
3. Barrett SCH (1993). The evolutionary biology of tristyly. In: Futuyma D, Antonovics J (eds) Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp 283-326.
4. Barrett SCH, Cole WW, Arroyo J, Cruzan MB, Lloyd DG (1997). Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): is this species tristylous? Heredity 78: 135-145.
5. Barrett SCH, Cole WW, Herrera CM (2004a). Mating patterns and genetic diversity in the wild daffodil Narcissus longispathus (Amaryllidaceae). Heredity 92: 459-465.
6. Barrett SCH, Cruzan MB (1994). Incompatibility in heterostylous plants. In: Williams EG, Knox RB, Clark AE (eds) Genetic Control of Incompatibility and Reproductive Development in Flowering Plants. Kluwer Academic: The Netherlands, pp 189-219.
7. Barrett SCH, Eckert CG (1990). Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. In: Kawano S (ed) Biological Approaches and Evolutionary Trends in Plants. Academic Press: London. pp 229-254.
8. Barrett SCH, Harder LD, Cole WW (2004b). Correlated evolution of floral morphology and mating-type frequencies in a sexually polymorphic plant. Evolution 58: 964-975.
9. Barrett SCH, Lloyd DG, Arroyo J (1996). Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH (eds) Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants. Chapman & Hall: New York. pp 339-376.
10. Blanchard JW (1990). Narcissus: A Guide to Wild Daffodils. Alpine Garden Society: Surrey, UK.
11. Charlesworth D (1979). The evolution and breakdown of tristyly. Evolution 33: 486-498.
12. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18: 237-268.
13. Coates DJ, Sokolowski RES (1992). The mating system and patterns of genetic variation in Banksia cuneata A.S. George (Proteaceae). Heredity 69: 11-20.
14. Degen B, Bandou E, Caron H (2004). Limited pollen dispersal and biparental inbreeding in Symphonia globulifera in French Guiana. Heredity 93: 585-591.
15. Dorken ME, Friedman J, Barrett SCH (2002). The evolution and maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Evolution 56: 31-41.
16. Eckert CG, Barrett SCH (1994). Postpollination mechanisms and the maintenance of outcrossing in self-compatible, tristylous, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Heredity 72: 396-411.
17. Fernandes A (1965). Contribution à la connaissance de la génétique de l'hétérostylie chez le genre Narcissus L. II. l'hétérostylie chez quelques populations de N. triandrus var cernuus et N. triandrus var. concolor. Genêt Ibérica 17: 215-239.
18. Fisher RA (1941). The theoretical consequences of polyploid inheritance for the mid style form in Lythrum salicaria. Ann Eugen 11: 31-38.
19. Fisher RA (1944). Allowance for double reduction in the calcualtion of genotype frequencies with polysomic inheritance. Ann Eugen 12: 169-171.
20. Griffin CAM, Eckert CG (2003). Experimental analysis of biparental inbreeding in a self-fertilizing plant. Evolution 57: 1513-1519.
21. Hamrick JL, Godt MJ (1989). Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS (eds) Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Sinauer: Sunderland, MA. pp 43-63.
22. Heuch I (1979). Equilibrium populations of heterostylous plants. Theor Popul Biol 15: 43-57.
23. Heywood JS (1991). Spatial analysis of genetic variation in plant populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 22: 335-355.
24. Holsinger KE (1996). Pollination biology and the evolution of mating systems in flowering plants. In: Hecht MK, Steere W, Wallace B (eds) Evolutionary Biology. Plenum Press: New York. pp 107-149.
25. Kalisz S, Nason JD, Hanzawa FM, Tonsor SJ (2001). Spatial population genetic structure in Trillium grandiflorum: the roles of dispersal, mating, history, and selection. Evolution 55: 1560-1568.
26. Kameyama Y, Isagi Y, Nakagoshi N (2002). Relatedness structure in Rhododendron metternichii var. hondoense revealed by microsatellite analysis. Mol Ecol 11: 519-527.
27. Kohn JR, Barrett SCH (1992). Experimental studies on the functional significance of heterostyly. Evolution 46: 43-55.
28. Levin DA, Kerster HW (1969a). Density-dependent gene dispersal in Liatris. Am Nat 103: 61-71.
29. Levin DA, Kerster HW (1969b). Dependence of bee-mediated pollen and gene dispersal upon plant density. Evolution 23: 560-571.
30. Lloyd DG (1980). Demographic factors and mating patterns in angiosperms. In: Solbrig OT (ed) Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations. Blackwell: Oxford. pp 67-88.
31. Lu YQ (2000). Effects of density on mixed mating systems and reproduction in natural populations of Impatiens capensis. Int J Plant Sci 161: 671-681.
32. Medrano M, Alonso C, Herrera CM (2005). Mating system, sex ratio, and persistence of females in the gynodioecious shrub Daphne laureola L. (Thymelaeaceae). Heredity 94: 37-43.
33. Moeller DA, Geber MA (2005). Ecological context of the evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana: population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance. Evolution 59: 786-799.
34. Raijmann LEL, vanLeeuwen NC, Kersten R, Oostremeijer JGB, DenNijs HCM, Menken SBJ (1994). Genetic variation and outcrossing rate in relation to population size in Gentiana pneumonanthe. Cons Biol 8: 1014-1026.
35. Rick CM, Holle M, Thorp RW (1978). Rates of cross-pollination in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: impact of genetic variation in floral characters. Pl Syst Evol 129: 31-44.
36. Ritland K (1990a). Inferences about inbreeding depression based on changes of the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 44: 1230-1241.
37. Ritland K (1990b). A series of Fortran computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. J Heredity 81: 235-237.
38. Ritland K (2002). Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228.
39. Routley MB, Mavraganis K, Eckert CG (1999). Effect of population size on the mating system in a self-compatible, autogamous plant, Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). Heredity 82: 518-528.
40. Sage TL, Strumas F, Cole WW, Barrett SCH (1999). Differential ovule development following self- and cross-pollination: the basis of self-sterility in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae). Am J Bot 86: 855-870.
41. SAS Institute (2000). Jmp Users Guide. 4.0. Sas Institute Inc.: Cary, NC.
42. SAS Institute (2001). Sas Onlinedoc. ver. 8.2. Sas Institute Inc.: Cary, NC.
43. Sidák Z (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 62: 626-633.
44. Sih A, Baltus M (1987). Patch size, pollinator behavior and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology 68: 1679-1690.
45. Turner ME, Stephens JC, Anderson WW (1982). Homozygosity and patch structure in plant populations as a result of nearest-neighbor pollination. Proc Natl Acad Sci-Biol 79: 203-207.
46. vanTreuren R, Bijlsma R, Ouborg NJ, vanDelden W (1993). The effects of population size and plant density on outcrossing rates in locally endangered Salvia pratensis. Evolution 47: 1094-1104.
47. Vogler DW, Kalisz S (2001). Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55: 202-204.
48. Watkins L, Levin DA (1990). Outcrossing rates as related to plant density in Phlox drummondii. Heredity 65: 81-89.
49. Weller SG (1992). Evolutionary modifications to tristylous breeding systems. In: Barrett SCH (ed) Evolution and function of Heterostyly. Springer Verlag: Berlin. pp 247-272.
50. Wendel JF, Weeden NF (1991). Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS (eds) Isozymes in Plant Biology. Dioscorides Press: Portland. pp 5-45.
51. Wright S (1943). Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.
52. Zoro Bi I, Maquet A, Baudoin JP (2005). Mating system of wild Phaseolus lunatus L. and its relationship to population size. Heredity 94: 153-158.