Mating system of wild Phaseolus lunatus L. and its relationship to population size

Heredity

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 153-158

  Zoro Bi, I ^a   Maquet, A ^b   Baudoin, J P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ NANGUI ABROGOUA   (Côte d’Ivoire)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Autogamy; Biparental inbreeding; Lima bean; Mating system; Outcrossing rate; Phaseolus lunatus; Population size

Indexed keywords

ISOENZYME;

AUTOGAMY; OUTCROSSING; POPULATION SIZE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ARTICLE; BEAN; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; INBREEDING; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION;

ELECTROPHORESIS, STARCH GEL; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS, POPULATION; INBREEDING; ISOENZYMES; MODELS, GENETIC; PHASEOLUS; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTION;

EMBRYOPHYTA; PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); PHASEOLUS LUNATUS;

EID: 13444282598     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800527     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aspinwall N, Christian T (1992). Clonal structure, genotypic diversity, and seed reproduction in populations of Filipendula rubra (Rosaceae) from the northcentral United States. Am J Bot 79: 294-299.
2. Brown AHD (1979). Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor Pop Biol 15: 1-42.
3. Brown AHD (1989). Genetic characterization of plant mating systems. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kalher AL, Weir BS (eds) Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources, Sinauer Associates Inc.: Sunderland, Massachusetts. pp 145-162.
4. Brown AHD, Allard RW (1970). Estimation of the mating system in open-pollinated maize populations using isozyme polymorphisms. Genetics 66: 133-145.
5. Cabin RJ (1996). Genetic comparisons of seed bank and seedling populations of a perennial desert mustard, Lesquerella fendleri. Evolution 50: 1830-1841.
6. Cabin RJ, Mitchell RJ, Marshall DL (1998). Do surface plant and soil seed bank populations differ genetically? A multipopulation study of the desert mustard Lesquerella fendleri (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 85: 1098-1109.
7. Degreef J (1998) Développement d'un modèle démographique et applications à la conservation in situ de populations sauvages de haricot de Lima (Phaseolus lunatus L.) dans la vallée centrale du Costa Rica, PhD, Fac Univ Sci Agron, Gembloux, Belgium.
8. Donnelly SE, Lortie CJ, Aarssen LW (1998). Pollination in Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae): the advantage of being tall. Am J Bot 85: 1618-1625.
9. Ennos RA (1981). Detection of selection in populations of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Biol J Linn Soc 15: 75-82.
10. Fausto Jr JA, Eckhart VM, Geber MA (2001). Reproductive assurance and the evolutionary ecology of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae). Am J Bot 88: 1794-1800.
11. Free JB (1993). Insect Pollination of Crops, Academic Press: London.
12. Fyfe JL, Bailey NTJ (1951). Plant breeding studies in leguminous forage crops. I. Natural cross-breeding in winter beans. J Agr Sci 41: 371-378.
13. Godt MJW, Hamrick JL (1991). Estimates of outcrossing rates in Lathyrus latifolius populations. Genome 34: 988-992.
14. Godt MJW, Hamrick JL (1993). Genetic diversity and population structure in Tradescantia hirsuticaulis (Commelinaceae). Am J Bot 80: 959-966.
15. Harding J, Tucker CL (1969). Quantitative studies on mating systems: III. Methods for the estimation of male gametophytic selective values and differential outcrossing rates. Evolution 23: 85-95.
16. Hardy O, Dubois S, Zoro Bi I, Baudoin JP (1997). Gene dispersal and its consequences on the genetic structure of wild populations of Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) in Costa Rica. Plant Genet Res Newsl 109: 1-6.
17. Hedrick PW (1990). Mating systems and evolutionnary genetics. In: Wohrmann K, Jain S (eds) Population Biology: Ecological and Evolutionary Viewpoints, Springer: New York. pp 83-114.
18. Kalher AL, Clegg MT, Allard RW (1975). Evolutionary changes in the mating system of an experimental population of Barley (Hordeum vulgaris L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 943-946.
19. Kunin WE (1997). Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. J Ecol 85: 225-234.
20. Lande R, Schemske DW (1985). The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
21. Li CC, Horvitz DG (1953). Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am J Hum Genet 5: 107-117.
22. Neel MC (2002). Conservation implications of the reproductive ecology of Agalinis acuta (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 89: 972-980.
23. Raijmann LEL, van Leeuwen NC, Kersten R, Oostermeijer JGB, den Nijs JCM, Menken SBJ (1994). Genetic variation and outcrossing rate in relation to population size in Gentiana pneumonanthe L. Conserv Biol 8: 1014-1026.
24. Ritland K (1983). Estimation of mating systems. In: Tanksley SD, Orton TJ (eds) Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Part A, Elsevier: Amsterdam. pp 289-302.
25. Ritland K (1984). The effective proportion of self-fertilization with consanguineous matings in inbred populations. Genetics 106: 139-152.
26. Ritland K (1990). A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. J Hered 81: 235-237.
27. Ritland K, Jain S (1981). A model for the estimation of outcrossing rate and gene frequencies using n independent loci. Heredity 47: 35-52.
28. Rocha OJ, Macaya G, Baudoin JP (1997). Causes of local extinction and recolonization, determined by 3 years of monitoring wild populations of Phaseolus lunatus L. in the central valley of Costa Rica. Plant Genet Res Newsl 112: 44-48.
29. SAS Institute Inc (1990). The SAS/STAT® Software Release 8.2 User Guide, SAS Institute Inc: Cary, NC.
30. Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH, Goodwillie C, Parker IM, Bishop JG (1994). Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75: 584-606.
31. Schemske DW, Lande R (1985). The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41-52.
32. Shaw DV, Brown AHD (1982). Optimum number of marker loci for estimating outcrossing in plant populations. Theor Appl Genet 61: 321-325.
33. Shaw DV, Kahler AL, Allard RW (1981). A multilocus estimator of mating system parameters in plant populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 1298-1302.
34. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995). Biometry, WH Freeman and Company: New York.
35. Uyenoyama MK (1986). Inbreeding and cost of meiosis: the evolution of selfing in populations practicing biparental inbreeding. Evolution (Lawrance, Kans) 40: 388-404.
36. van Treuren R, Bijlsma R, Ouborg NJ, van Delden W (1993). The effects of population size and plant density on outcrossing rates in localy endangered Salvia pratensis. Evolution 47: 1094-1104.
37. Webster BD, Lynch SP, Tucker CL (1979). A morphological study of the development of reproductive structures of Phaseolus lunatus L. J Am Soc Hort Sci 104: 240-243.
38. Wright S (1965). The interpretation of population structure with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
39. Zoro Bi I (1999) Variabilité génétique des populations sauvages de Phaseolus lunatus L. dans la vallée centrale du Costa Rica et ses implications dans la mise au point d'une stratégie de conservation in situ. PhD, Fac. Univ. Sci. Agron., Gembloux, Belgium.
40. Zoro Bi I, Maquet A, Baudoin JP (1999). Genetic control of isozymes in the gene pool Phaseolus lunatus L. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 13: 10-27.