Ontologies for data and knowledge sharing in biology: Plant ROS signaling as a case study

BioEssays

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 199-210

  Strizh, Irina G ^a  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

BIOLOGY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA EXTRACTION; DATA SYNTHESIS; EXPERT SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION STORAGE; KNOWLEDGE; NONHUMAN; ONTOLOGY; PLANT; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 33644536086     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20368     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Allen JF. 2001. Bioinformatics and discovery: induction beckons again. BioEssays 23:104-107.
2. Rhee SY. 2004. Carpe diem. Retooling the "publish or perish" model into "share and survive" model. Plant Physiol 134:543-547.
3. Mayer K, Mewes H-W. 2001. How can we deliver the large plant genomes? Strategies and perspectives. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:173-177.
4. Vandenabeele S, Van Der Kelen K, Dat J, Gadjev I, et al. 2003. A comprehensive analysis of hydrogen peroxide-induced gene expression in tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:16113-16118.
5. Stein LD. 2002. Creating a bioinformatics nation. Nature 417:119-120.
6. Gruber TR. 1993. A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5:199-220.
7. URL: http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html
8. Bard JB. 2003. Ontologies: formalizing biological knowledge for bioinformatics. BioEssays 25:501-506.
9. Chandrasekaran B, Josephson JR, Benjamins VR. 1999. What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intellig Systems 14:20-26.
10. The Buffalo Ontology Site: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/
11. Wache H, Vögele T, Visser T, Stuckenschmidt H, Schuster G, et al. 2001. Ontology-based integration of information-A survey of existing approaches. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-01 Workshop: ontologies and information sharing, Seattle, WA, p 108-117.
12. Omelayenko B. 2001. Syntactic-level ontology integration rules for E-commerce. In: Proceedings of the 14th International FLAIRS Conference (FLAIRS-2001), Key West, FL, AAAI Press, p 324-328.
13. The World Wide Web Consortium: URL: http://www.w3.org
14. Bianchini D, De Antonellis V. 2004. Ontology-based integration for sharing knowledge over the web. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Data Integration over the Web, DIWeb 2004, Riga, Latvia, p 82-89.
15. The Semantic Web Community Portal: URL: http://www.semanticweb.org
16. Zhuchkov A, Tverdokhlebov N, Arnautov S, Golitsin S, Strizh I. 2004. Information searching and integration in heterogeneous and dynamic information resources by ontologies. In: Digital libraries: advanced methods and technologies, digital collections. Proceedings of RCDL'2004, Pushchino, Russia, p 81-83.
17. Bard JB, Rhee SY. 2004. Ontologies in biology: design, application and future challenges. Nature Review Genetics 5:213-222.
18. Gechev TS, Hille J. 2005. Hydrogen peroxide as a signal controlling plant programmed cell death. J Cell Biol 168:17-20.
19. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M, Breusegem V. 2004. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci 9:490-498.
20. Laloi C, Apel K, Danon A. 2004. Reactive oxygen signaling: the latest news. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:323-328.
21. Stein LD. 2003. Integrating biological databases. Nature Reviews Genetics 4:337-345.
22. Smirnova OG, Stepanenko IL. 2003. Application of filter technology in Photomorphogenesis Gene Network. In Silico Biology 3:117-125.
23. Mueller LA, Zhang P, Rhee SY. 2003. AraCyc: a biochemical pathway database for arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 132:453-460.
24. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): URL: http://www. arabidopsis.org
25. Karp P, Paley S, Romero P. 2002. The Pathway Tools software. Bioinformatics Suppl 18:S225-S232.
26. Wurtele ES, Li J, Diao L, Zhang H, Foster CM, et al. 2003. MetNet: software to build and model the biogenetic lattice of Arabidopsis. Comp Fund Genom 4:239-245.
27. Thimm O, Blasing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, et al. 2004. MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J 37:914-939.
28. Schoof H, Ernst R, Mayer KFX. 2004. The PlaNet consortium: a network of European plant databases connecting plant genome data in an integrated biological knowledge resource. Comp Funct Genom 5:184-189.
29. PlaNet project: URL: http://www.eu-plant-genome.net
30. Wilkinson MD, Links M. 2002. BioMOBY: an open source biological web services proposal. Briefings Bioinformat 3:331-341.
31. BioMoby: URL: http://biomoby.org
32. Kovtun Y, Chiu WL, Tena G, Sheen J. 2000. Functional analysis of oxidative stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:2940-2945.
33. Schulze-Kremer S. 1998. Ontologies for molecular biology. In: Proceedings of the Third Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. AAAI Press, Hawai, p 693-704.
34. Stevens R., Goble CA, Bechhofer S. 2000. Ontology-based knowledge representation for bioinformatics. Brief Bioinformatics 1:398-416.
35. Schulze-Kremer S. 2002. Ontologies for molecular biology and bioinformatics. In Silico Biology 2:179-193.
36. Baker PG, Goble CA, Bechhofer S, Paton NW, Stevens R, et al. 1999. An ontology for bioinformatics applications. Bioinformatics 15:510-520.
37. The Transparent Access to Multiple Biological Information Sources (TAMBIS ontology): URL: http://img.cs.man.ac.uk/tambis
38. Karp PD. 2000. An ontology for biological function based on molecular interactions. Bioinformatics 16:269-285.
39. Karp PD, Riley M, Paley SM, Pellegrini-Toole A. 2002. The MetaCyc Database. Nucleic Acids Res 30:56-58.
40. MetaCyc database: URL: metacyc.org
41. Kohler J, Schulze-Kremer S. 2002. The semantic metadatabase (SEMEDA): ontology based integration of federated molecular biological data sources. In Silico Biology 2:219-231.
42. Wroe C, Stevens R, Goble CA, Roberts A, Greenwood M. 2003. A suite of DAML + OIL ontologies to describe bioinformatics web services and data. Int J Cooper Inform Systems 12:197-224.
43. MyGrid project: URL: http://www.mygrid.org.uk
44. Joutchkov A, Tverdohlebov N, Strizh I, Arnautov S, Golitsyn S. 2005. Grid-based onto-technologies provide an effective instrument for biomedical research. In: Solomonides T, et al., editors. From Grid to Healthgrid. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics IOS Press, v. 112. p 37-46.
45. The Open Biological Ontologies Website: URL: http://obo.sourceforge.net/
46. The Gene Ontology Consortium. 2000. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genet 25:25-29.
47. The Gene Ontology Consortium: URL: http://www.geneontology.org
48. Hill DP, Blake JA, Richardson JE, Ringwald M. 2002. Extension and integration of the Gene Ontology (GO): combining GO vocabularies with external vocabularies. Genome Research 12:1982-1991.
49. Rector AL. 1999. Clinical terminology: why is it so hard? Methods of information in medicine. Schattaue ISSN 0026-1270 38:239-252.
50. The Plant Ontology Consortium. 2002. The Plant Ontology consortium and plant ontologies. Comp Funct Genom 3:137-142.
51. The Plant Ontology Consortium: URL: http://plantontology.org
52. Jaiswal P, Ware D, Ni J, Chang K, Zhao W, et al. 2002. Gramene: development and integration of trait and gene ontologies for rice. Comp Funct Genom 3:132-136.
53. The Trait Ontology: URL: http://www.gramene.org/plant_ontology/
54. Vincent PLD, Coe EH, Polacco ML. 2003. Zea mays ontology-a database of international terms. Trends Plant Sci 8:517-520.
55. Paterson T, Kennedy JB, Pullan MR, Cannon A, Armstrong K, et al. 2004. A universal character model and ontology of defined terms for taxonomic description. E.Rahm, editor. DILS 2004, LNBI 2994, p 63-78.
56. The Prometheus project: URL: http://www.dcs.napier.ac.uk/~prometheus/#
57. Bard J, Rhee SY, Ashburner M. 2005. An ontology for cell types. Genome Biology 6:R21.
58. Koehler J, Rawlings C, Verrier P, Mitchell R, Skusa A, et al. 2004. Linking experimental results, biological networks and sequence analysis methods using ontologies and generalized data structures. In Silico Biol 5:33-44.
59. Ideker T, Galitsky T, Hood L. 2001. A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2:343-372.
60. Minorsky PV. 2003. Achieving the in silico plant. Systems biology and the future of plant biological research. Plant Physiol 132:404-409.
61. Girke T, Ozkhan M, Carter D, Raikhel NV. 2003. Towards a modeling infrastructure for studying plant cells. Plant Physiol 132:410-414.
62. Sweetlove LJ, Last RL, Fernie AR. 2003. Predictive metabolic engineering: a goal for systems biology. Plant Physiol 132:420-425.
63. Nikiforova VJ, Gakiere B, Kempa S, Adamik M, Willmitzer L, et al. 2004. Towards dissecting nutrient metabolism in plants: a systems biology case study on sulphur metabolism. J Exp Botany 55:1861-1870.
64. Bevan M, Walsh S. 2004. Positioning Arabidopsis in plant biology. A key step toward unification of plant research. Plant Physiol 135:602-606.
65. Rensink WA, Buell CR. 2004. Arabidopsis to rice. Applying knowledge from a weed to enhance our understanding of a crop species. Plant Physiol 135:622-629.
66. Karp PD, Paley S, Krieger CJ, Zhang P. 2004. An evidence ontology for use in pathway/genome databases. Pac Symp Biocomput 9:190-201.
67. Takai-Igarashi T, Mizoguchi R. 2004. Ontological integration of data models for cell signaling pathways by defining a factor of casuality called "signal". Genome Inform 15:255-265.
68. Choi C, Kel-Margoulis O, Potapov A, Crass T, Krull M, et al. 2004. Consistent re-modeling of signaling pathways and its implementation in the TRANSPATH Database. Genome Inform 15:244-254.
69. Signal Ontology: URL: http://ontology.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp/signalontology/
70. Takai-Igarashi T, Mizoguchi R. 2004. Cell Signaling Networks Ontology. In Silico Biology 4:81-87.
71. Demir E, Babur O, Dogrusoz U, Gursoy A, Ayaz A, et al. 2004. An ontology for collaborative construction and analysis of cellular pathways. Bioinformatics 20:349-356.
72. Paek E, Park J, Lee KJ. 2004. Multi-layered representation for cell signaling pathways. Mol Cell Proteomics 3:1009-1022.
73. Mehler AH. 1951. Studies on reactions of illuminated chloroplasts. I. Mechanism of the reduction of oxygen and other Hill reagents. Arch Biochem Biophys 33:65-77.
74. Strizh IG, Lysenko GG, Neverov KV. 2005. Oxygen photoreduction in photosystem II preparations under photoinhibition. Rus J Plant Physiol 52:717-723.
75. Jones DM, Bench-Capon TJM, Visser PRS. 1998. Methodologies for ontology development. In: Cuena J, editor. Proc. Iti and KNOWS Conference of the 15th IFIP World Computer Congress, London, UK: Chapman and Hall Ltd, p 62-75.
76. Poli R. 2002. Ontological methodology. Int J Human-Computer Studies 56:639-664.
77. Fernandez-Breis JT, Martines-Bejar R. 2002. A cooperative framework for integrating ontologies. Int J Human-Computer Stud 56:665-720.
78. Denny M. 2002. Ontology building: a survey of editing tools. Published on XML.com URL: http://www.xml.eom/pub/a/2002/11/06/ontologies. html
79. Balzer S, Liebig T, Wagner M. 2004. Pitfalls of OWL-S-a practical semantic web use case. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC'04) New York, NY, USA.
80. Smith B, Ceusters W, Klagges B, Köhler J, Kumar A, et al. 2005. Relations in Biomedical Ontologies. Genome Biol 6(5):R46.
81. Duineveld AJ, Stoter R, Weiden MR, Kenepa B, Benjamins VR. 1999. Wondertools? A comparative study of ontological engineering tools. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Knowledge, Acquisition, Modeling and Management. Banff, Canada, p 4.6.1-4.6.20.
82. Lambrix P, Habbouche M, Perez M. 2003. Evaluation of ontology development tools for bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 19:1564-1571.
83. Noy NF, Sintek M, Decker S, Crubezy M, Fergerson R, et al. 2001. Creating semantic web contents with Protégé-2000. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16:60-71.
84. Lambrix P, Edberg A. 2003. Evaluation of ontology merging tools in bioinformatics. Pac Symp Biocomput 8:589-600.
85. Strizh IG, Lysenko GG, Neverov KV. 2005. Study of the Mehler reaction under excessive illumination in photosystem II preparations. In van der Est A, Bruce D ed Photosynthesis: Fundamental Aspects to Global Perspectives, Allen Press. p 476-478.
86. 2 as an alternative electron sink in photosynthesis? Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:193-198.