Screening for new antidepressant leads of multiple activities by support vector machines

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 158-167

  Lepp, Zsolt ^a   Kinoshita, Takashi ^a   Chuman, Hiroshi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESCRIBING FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SCREENING; SET THEORY; VECTORS;

BIOLOGICAL TARGETS; DESCRIPTORS; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

DRUG PRODUCTS;

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ANTIDEPRESSIVE AGENTS; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 33244481311     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci050301y     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Adell, A.; Castro, E.; Celada, P.; Bortolozzi, A.; Pazos, A.; Artigas, F. Strategies for producing faster acting antidepressants. Drug Discovery Today 2005, 10 (8), 578-585.
2. Niwa, T. Prediction of Biological Targets Using Probabilistic Neural Networks and Atom-Type Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47 (10), 2645-2650.
3. Vapnik, V. N. Statistical Learning Theory; John Wiley & Sons: 1998.
4. Chen, N.; Lu, W.; Li, J. Y. G. Support Vector Machine In Chemistry; World Scientific Pub Co. Inc.: 2004.
5. Jorissen, R. N.; Gilson, M. K.; Virtual Screening of Molecular Databases Using a Support Vector Machine. J. Chem. Inf. Model 2005, 45 (3), 549-561.
6. Gasteiger, J. Handbook of Chemoinformatics: From Data to Knowledge; Wiley: 2003.
7. MDL Drug Data Report 2004 and Screening Compounds Directory 2005; Elsevier MDL: Hayward, CA.
8. Chang, C.-C.; Lin, C.-J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines; 2001. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/lib.
9. JChem 3.0; ChemAxon Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
10. XLSTAT-Pro 7.5; Addinsoft, Brooklyn, NY.
11. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, http://www.R-project.org.
12. Kecman, V. Learning and Soft Computing; The MIT Press: 2001.
13. Kearns, M. S.; Solla, S. A.; Cohn, D. A. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 10&11; MIT Press: 1998.
14. Burbidge, R.; Trotter, M.; Buxton, B.; Holden, S. Drug design by machine learning: support vector machines for pharmaceutical data analysis. Comput. Chem. 2001, 1, 5-14.
15. Liu, H. X.; Zhang, R. S.; Yao, X. J.; Liu, M. C.; Hu, Z. D.; Fan, B. T. Prediction of the Isoelectric Point of an Amino Acid Based on GA-PLS and SVMs. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 1, 161-167.
16. Sorich, M. J.; Miners, J. O.; McKinnon, R. A.; Winkler, D. A.; Burden, F. R.; Smith, P. A. Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Classification Algorithms for the Prediction of Drug and Chemical Metabolism by Human UDP- Glucuronosyltransferase Isoforms. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 2019-2024.
17. Byvatov, E.; Fechner, U.; Sadowski, J.; Schneider, G. Comparison of Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network Systems for Drug/Nondrug Classification. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1855-1859.
18. Yao, J.; Panaye, A.; Doucet, J. P.; Zhang, R. S.; Chen, H. F.; Liu, M. C.; Hu, Z. D.; Fan, B. T. Comparative Study of QSAR/QSPR Correlations Using Support Vector Machines, Radial Basis Function Neural Networks, and Multiple Linear Regression. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1257-1266.
19. Zernov, V. V.; Balakin, K. V.; Ivaschenko, A. A.; Savchuk, N. P.; Pletnev, I. V. Drug discovery Using Support Vector Machines. The Case Studies of Drug-likeness, Agrochemical-likeness, and Enzyme Inhibition Predictions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 2048-2056.
20. Merkwirth, C.; Mauser, H.; Schulz-Gasch, T.; Roche, O.; Stahl, M.; Lengauer, T. Ensemble Methods for Classification in Cheminformatics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1971-1978.
21. Kelley, L. A.; Gardner, S. P.; Sutcliffe, M. J. An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. Protein Eng. 1996, 9, 1063-1065.
22. Martin, Y. C.; Kofron, J. L.; Traphagen, L. M. Do Structurally Similar Molecules Have Similar Biological Activity? J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45 (19), 4350-4358.
23. Thimm, M.; Goede, A.; Hougardy, S.; Preissner, R. Comparison of 2D Similarity and 3D Superposition. Application to Searching a Conformational Drug Database. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (5), 1816-1822.
24. Willett, P. Searching Techniques for Databases of Two- and Three-Dimensional Chemical Structures. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (13), 4183-4199.
25. Klebe, G. Virtual Screening: An Alternative or Complement to High Throughput Screening? Kluwer Academic Publishers: 2000.
26. Bohm, H.-J.; Schneider, G. Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules; Wiley-VCH: 2000.