Supervised self-organizing maps in drug discovery. 2. improvements in descriptor selection and model validation

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 137-144

  Xiao, Yun De ^a   Harris, Rebecca ^a   Bayram, Ersin ^b,c   Peter Santago, I I ^b,c   Schmitt, Jeffrey D ^a  

^a TARGACEPT INC   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESCRIBING FUNCTIONS; MAPS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; TOPOLOGY;

DATA SETS; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; SELF-ORGANIZING MAPS;

DRUG PRODUCTS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DRUG SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33244477895     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0500841     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Bellman, R. Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1961.
2. Rogers, D.; Hopfinger, A. J. Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 4-866.
3. Gasteiger, J.; Zupan, J. Neural Networks in Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 503-527.
4. Kittler, J. Feature selection and extraction. In Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Image Processing; Young, T. Y., Fu, K.-S., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1986.
5. Inza, I.; Merino, M.; Larranaga, P.; Quiroga, J.; Sierra, B.; Girala, M. Feature Subset Selection by Population-Based Incremental Learning; Technical Report no. EHU-KZAA-IK-1/99; University of the Basque Country: Spain, 1999.
6. Yang, J.; Honavar, V. Feature subset selection using a genetic algorithm. In Genetic Programming 1997: Proceedings of Second Annual Conference; Koza, J., Ed.; Morgan Kaufmann: San Fransisco, CA, 1997; p 380.
7. Kudo, M.; Somol, P.; Pudil, P.; Shimbo, M.; Sklansky, J. Comparison of classifier-specific feature selection algorighms. In SSPP/SPR; 2000; pp 677-686.
8. Kohonen, T. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybernetics 1982, 43.
9. Kohonen, T. Self-organizing Maps; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1995.
10. Gasteiger, J.; Zupan, J. Neural Networks for Chemists An Introduction. VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1993; pp 277-291.
11. Gasteiger, J.; Li, X. Angew. Chem. 1994, 106, 671-674.
12. Rose, V. S.; Croall, I. F.; MacFie, H. J. H. An Application of Unsupervised Neural Network Methodology Kohonen Topology-Preserving Mapping to QSAR Analysis. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1991, 10 (1), 6-15.
13. Polanski, J. Self-organizing neural network for modeling 3D QSAR of colchicinoids. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2000, 47 (1), 37-45.
14. Espinosa, G.; Arenas, A.; Giralt, F. An integrated SOM-fuzzy ARTMAP neural system for the evaluation of toxicity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 343-59.
15. Xiao, Y.-D.; Clauset, A.; Harris, R.; Bayram, E.; Santago, P., II; Schmitt, J. D. Supervised Self-Organizing Maps in Drug Discovery. 1. Robust Behavior with Overdetermined Data Sets. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 1749-1758.
16. Lachenbrush, P. A.; Mickey, M. Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis. Technometrics 1968, 10, 1-11.
17. Stone, M. An Asymptotic Equivalence of Choice of Model by Cross-Validation and Akaike's Criterion. J. R. Stat. Soc., B 1977, 38, 44-47.
18. Eriksson, L.; Johansson, E.; Muller, M.; Wold, S. On the selection of the training set in environmental QSAR analysis when compounds are clustered. J. Chemom. 2000, 14, 599-616.
19. Martens, H. A.; Dardenne, P. Validation and verification of regression in small data sets. 1998, 44, 99-121.
20. Schmitt, J. D. Exploring the Nature of Molecular Recognition in Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 7, 749-800.
21. 1 receptor ligands. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41 (13), 2361-2370.
22. 3 receptors. Med. Chem. Res. 1998, 8 (3), 115-131.
23. 3 receptor binding and quantitative structure-activity studies on substituted 2,3-dimethoxy-N-1-benzyl-4-piperidnyl)benzamides and related compounds. Med. Chem. Res. 1999, 9 (1), 35-49.
24. Mach, R. H.; Hammond, P. S.; Huang, Y.; Yang, B.; Xu. Y.; Cheney, J. T.; Freeman, R.; Luedtke, R. R. Structure-activity relationship studies of N-(9-benzyl)-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-3b-yl benzamide analogues for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. Med. Chem. Res. 1999, 9 (6), 355-373.
25. Huang, Y.; Luedtke, R. R.; Freeman, R. A.; Wu, L.; Mach, R. H. Synthesis of 2-(2, 3,-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-(aminomethyl)imidazole analogues and their binding affinities for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 3113-3122.
26. Huang, Y.; Luedtke, R. R.; Freeman, R. A.; Wu, L.; Mach, R. H. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of naphthamides as dopamine D3 receptor ligands. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1815-1826.
27. Yoshida, F.; Topliss, J. G. QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2575-85.
28. Mansch, C. A Quantitative Approach to Biochemical Structure - Activity Relationships. Acc. Chem. Res. 1969, 2, 232-39.
29. Developmental Therapeutics Program NCI/NIH. http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/.
30. QSARIS, 1.1; MDL Information Systems Inc.: San Leandro, CA.
31. 2 Modeling Environment, release 4.9; Accelrys Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2003.
32. Cruciani, G.; Pastor, M.; Mecucci, S. Volsurf, 3.0.9; Molecular Discovery Ltd.: Pinner, Middlesex, U. K.
33. Dragon, 4.0; Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, University of Milano-Bicocca: Milano, Italy. http://www.telemacus.it/talete/.
34. Golbraikh, A.; Shen, M.; Xiao, Z.; Xiao, Y.-D.; Lee, K.-H.; Tropsha, A. Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models.
35. Frank, I. E.; Todeschini, R. The Data Analysis Handbook. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1994.
36. Van der Putten, P. Utilizing the Topology Preserving Property of Self-Organizing Maps for Classification. MSc Thesis, Cognitive Artificial Intelligence, Utrecht University, NL, 1996.
37. Kohonen, T.; Makisara, K.; Saramaki, T. Phonotopic Maps - Insightful Representation of Phonological Features for Speech Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Seventh International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Montreal, Canada, July 30-August 2, 1984; pp 182-185.
38. Kohonen, T. The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing 1998, 21 (1-3), 1-6.
39. Metroplis, N.; Rosenbluth, M. N.; Teller, A. H. Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21, 1087-1092.
40. Kirkpatrick, S.; Gelatt, C. D., Jr.; Vecchi, M. P. Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science 1983, 220, 671-680.
41. Sutter, J. M.; Kalivas, J. H. Comparison of forward selection, backward elimination, and generalized simulated annealing for variable selection. Microchem. J. 1993, 47, 60-66.
42. Shen, M.; LeTiran, A.; Xiao, Y.; Golbraikh, A.; Kohn, H.; Tropsha, A. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis of Functionalized Amino Acid Anticonvulsant Agents Using k Nearest Neighbor and Simulated Annealing PLS Methods. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45 (13), 2811-2823.
43. Zheng, W.; Tropsha, A. A novel variable selection QSAR approach based on the K-nearest neighbor principle. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 185-194.
44. Xiao, Z.; Xiao, Y.-D.; Feng, J.; Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A.; Lee, K.-H. Antitumor Agents. 213. Modeling of Epipodophyllotoxin Derivatives Using Variable Selection k Nearest Neighbor QSAR Method. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45 (11), 2294-2309.
45. Shen, M.; Xiao, Y.; Golbraikh, A.; Gombar, V. K.; Tropsha, A. Development and Validation of k-Nearest-Neighbor QSPR Models of Metabolic Stability of Drug Candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46 (14), 3013-3020.
46. Sutler, J. M.; Dixon, S. L.; Jurs, P. C. Automated descriptor selection for quantitative structure-activity relationships using generalized simulated annealing. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 77-84.
47. So, S.-S.; van Helden, S. P.; van Geerestein, V. J.; Karplus, M. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Studies of Progesterone Receptor Binding Steroids. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40 (3), 762-772.
48. Sun, L.; Xie, Y.; Song, X.; Wang, J.; Yu, R. Cluster Analysis By Simulated Annealing. Comput. Chem. 1994, 18, 103-108.
49. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A. Beware of q2! J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 269-276.
50. Stone, M. Cross validatory choice and the assessment of statistical prediction. J. R. Stat. Soc., B 1974, 36, 111-133.
51. Hawkins, D. M. The Problem of Overfitting. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1-12.