Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Studies of Progesterone Receptor Binding Steroids

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 762-772

  So, Sung Sau ^a,d   Van Helden, Steven P ^b   Van Geerestein, Vincent J ^b   Karplus, Martin ^a,c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NV ORGANON   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^d HOFFMANN LA ROCHE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR; STEROID;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN BINDING; RECEPTORS, PROGESTERONE; STEROIDS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0034184034     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci990130v     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Kubinyi, H. Variable selection in QSAR studies. I. An evolutionary algorithm. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1994, 13, 285-294.
2. Leardi, R.; Boggia, R.; Terrile, M. Genetic algorithms for a strategy for feature selection. J. Chemom. 1992, 6, 267-281.
3. Leardi, R.; Boggia, R.; Terrile, M. Genetic algorithms as a strategy for feature selection. J. Chemom. 1992, 6, 267-281.
4. Wikel, J. H.; Dow, E. R. The use of neural networks for variable selection in QSAR. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 645-651.
5. Sutter, J. M.; Kalivas, J. H. Comparison of forward selection, backward elimination, and generalized simulated annealing for variable selection. Microchem. J 1993, 47, 60-66.
6. Rogers, D. R.; Hopfinger, A. J. Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 854-866.
7. Kubinyi, H. Variable selection in QSAR studies. II. A highly efficient combination of systematic search and evolution. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1994, 13, 393-401.
8. Luke, B. T. Evolutionary programming applied to the development of quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1279-1287.
9. Leardi, R. Application of genetic algorithms feature selection under full validation conditions and to outlier detection. J. Chemom. 1994, 8, 65-79.
10. Sutter, J. M.; Dixon, S. L.; Jurs, P. C. Automated descriptor selection for quantitative structure-activity relationships using generalized simulated annealing. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 77-84.
11. Wessel, M. D.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of normal boiling points for a diverse set of industrially important organic compounds from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 841-850.
12. Hahn, M.; Rogers, D. Receptor surface models. 2. Application to quantitative structure-activity relationships studies. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2091-2102.
13. Maddalena, D. J.; Johnston, G. A. R. Prediction of receptor properties and binding affinity of ligands to benzodiazepine/GABAA receptors using artificial neural networks. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 715-724.
14. Sutter, J. M.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of aqueous solubility for a diverse set of heteroatom-containing organic compounds using a quantitative structure-activity relationship. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 100-107.
15. Kubinyi, H. Evolutionary variable selection in regression and PLS analyses. J. Chemom. 1996, 10, 119-133.
16. So, S.-S.; Karplus, M. Evolutionary optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationship: an application of genetic neural network. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1521-1530.
17. A receptors. J. Med Chem. 1996, 39, 5246-5256.
18. Mitchell, B. E.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of autoignition temperature of organic compounds from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 538-547.
19. Engelhardt, H. L.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of supercritical carbon dioxide solubility of organic compounds from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 478-484.
20. Hasegawa, K.; Miyashita, Y.; Funatsu, K. GA strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: GA based PLS analysis of calcium channel antagonists. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 306-310.
21. Mitchell, B. E.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 489-496.
22. Wessel, M. D.; Jurs, P. C.; Tolan, J. W.; Muskal, S. M. Prediction of human intestinal absorption of drug compounds from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 726-735.
23. Leardi, R.; González, A. L. Genetic algorithms applied to feature selection in PLS regression: How and when to use them. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 41, 195-207.
24. Shi, L. M.; Fan, Y.; Myers, T. G.; O'Conner, P. M.; Paull, K. D.; Friend, S. H.; Weinstein, J. N. Mining the NCI anticancer drug discover databases: Genetic function approximation for the QSAR study of anticancer ellipticine analogues. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 189-199.
25. Hasegawa, K.; Funatsu, K. GA strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: GAPLS and D-optimal designs for predictive QSAR model. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 1998, 425, 255-262.
26. Hasegawa, K.; Kimura, T.; Funatsu, K. GA strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: Enhancement of comparative molecular binding energy analysis by GA-based PLS method. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1999, 18, 262-272.
27. Hasegawa, K.; Kimura, T.; Funatsu, K. GA strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: Application of GA-based region selection to a 3D-QSAR study of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 112-120.
28. Kimura, T.; Hasegawa, K.; Funatsu, K. GA strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: GA-based region selection for CoMFA modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 276-282.
29. 2, Version 2.0; Molecular Simulations Inc.: San Diego, CA, 1996.
30. Kowar, T. R. Genetic function approximation experimental design (GFAXD): A new method for experimental design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 858-866.
31. 6-6-Substituted Progesterone Series. J. Med. Chem. 1973, 16, 1370-1376.
32. Coburn, R. A.; Solo, A. J. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships among Steroids. Investigations of the Use of Steric Parameters. J. Med. Chem. 1976, 19, 784-754.
33. Lee, D. L.; Kollman, P. A.; Marsh, F. J.; Wolff, M. E. Quantitative relationships between steroid structure and binding to putatve progesterone receptors. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 20, 1139-1146.
34. van den Broek, A. J.; Broess, A. I. A.; van den Heuvel, M. J.; de Jongh, H. P.; Leemhuis, J.; Schönemann, K. H.; Smits, J.; de Visser, J.; van Vliet, N. P.; Zeelen, F. J. Strategy in drug research. Synthesis and study of the progestational and ovulation inhibitory activity of a series of 11b-substituted-17a-ethynyl-4-estren-17b-ols. Steroids 1977, 30, 481-510.
35. Moriguchi, I.; Komatsu, K.; Matsushita, Y. Pattern recognition for the study of structure-activity relationships. Anal. Chim. Acta 1981, 133, 625-636.
36. Daux, W. L.; Griffin, J. F.; Rohrer, D. C. Steroid conformation, receptor binding, and hormone action. In Horn, A. J., de Ranter, C. J., Eds.; X-ray crystallography and drug action, Course of the International School of Crystallography 9th; Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K., 1984; pp 406-426.
37. Belaisch, J. Chemical classification of synthetic progestogens. Rev. Fr. Gynecol. Obstet. 1985, 80, 473-477.
38. Doré, J. C.; Gilbert, J.; Ojasoo, T.; Raynaud, J. P. Correspondence analysis applied to steroid receptor binding. J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 54-60.
39. Hopper, H. O.; Hammann, P. The influence of structure modification on progestrone and androgen receptor binding of norethisterone. Correlation with nucluear magnetic resonance signals. Acta Endocrinol. (Copenhagen) 1987, 115, 406-412.
40. Ojasoo, T.; Doré, J. C.; Gilbert, J.; Raynaud, J. P. Binding of Steroids to the Progestin and Glucocorticoid Receptors Analyzed by Correspondence Analysis. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 1160-1169.
41. Loughney, D. A.; Schwender, C. F. A comparison of progestin and androgen receptor binding using the CoMFA technique. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1992, 6, 569-581.
42. van Helden, S. P.; Hamersma, H.; van Geerestein, V. J. Prediction of progesterone receptor binding of steroids using a combination of genetic algorithms and neural networks. In Genetic Algorithm in Molecular Modeling; Devillers, J., Ed.; Academic Press: London, U.K., 1996.
43. 2, Version 1.5: Molecular Simulations Inc.: San Diego, CA, 1995.
44. Bergink, E. W.; van Meel, F.; Turpijn, E. W.; van der Vies, J. Binding of progestagens to receptor proteins in MCF-7 cells. J. Steroid Biochem. 1983, 19, 1563-1570.
45. 30O). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1976, 5, 543-546.
46. van Geerestein, V. J. Structure of the enthanol solvate of 13-ethyl-11b-methyl-18-norlynestrenol. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C 1988, 44, 376-378.
47. Gasteiger, J.; Rudolph, C.; Sadowski, J. Automatic generation of 3D atomic coordinates for organic molecules. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 1990, 3 (6C), 537-547.
48. Chem-X, Version 1.5 Chemical Design Ltd.: Chipping Norton, U.K., 1995.
49. Stewart, J. J. P. MOPAC: A semiempirical molecular orbital program. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1990, 4, 1-105.
50. The CRC Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1995.
51. Available upon request from S. P. van Helden; e-mail: s.helden@ organon.oss.akzonobel.nl.
52. Topliss, J. G.; Edwards, R. P. Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships. J. Med. Chem. 1979, 22, 1238-1244.
53. Møller, M. F. A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Networks 1993, 6, 525-533.
54. Maggiora, G. M.; Elrod, D. W. Computational neural networks as model-free mapping devices. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 732-741.
55. Kirkpatrick, S.; Gelatt, C. D. J.; Vecchi, M. P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983, 220, 671-680.
56. Metropolis, N.; Rosenbluth, A. W.; Rosenbluth, M. N.; Teller, A. H. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21, 1087-1092.
57. Press, W. H.; Teukolsky, S. A.; Vetterling, W. T.; Flannery, B. P. Numerical recipes in C; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1992.
58. Cramer, R. D., III; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
59. Shao, J. Linear-model selection by cross-validation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1993, 88, 486-494.
60. Cartwright, H. M. Applications of artificial intelligence in chemistry; Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K., 1993.
61. Livingstone, D. J.; Manallack, D. T. Statistics using neural networks: Chance effects. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 1295-1297.
62. van de Waterbeemd, H. Chemometric methods in Molecular Design; VCH; Weinheim, Germany, 1995.
63. Jouan-Rimbaud, D.; Massart, D. L.; de Noord, O. E. Random correlation in variable selection for multivariate calibration with a genetic algorithm. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1996, 35, 213-220.
64. So, S.-S.; Richards, W. G. Application of neural networks: Quantitative structure-activity relationships of the derivatives of 2,4-diamino-5-(substituted-benzyl)pyrimidines as DHFR inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 3201-3207.
65. Rogers, D. Evolutionary statistics: Using a genetic algorithm and model reduction to isolate alternate statistical hypotheses of experimental data. The Seventh International Conference on Genetic Algorithms; Morgan-Kaufmann: San Francisco, 1997.
66. So, S.-S.; Karplus, M. A comparative study of ligand-receptor complex binding affinity prediction methods based on glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13, 243-258.