Phenotypic evolution of human craniofacial morphology after admixture: A geometric morphometrics approach

American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 387-398

  Martínez Abadías, Neus ^a   González José, Rolando ^a,b   González Martín, Antonio ^c   Van Der Molen, Silvina ^b   Talavera, Arturo ^d   Hernández, Patricia ^e   Hernández, Miquel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^c Area Academica Antropologia Historia   (Mexico)

^d Dirección de Antropología Física   (Mexico)

^e INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ANTROPOLOGÍA E HISTORIA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Craniofacial shape; EDMA; Gene flow; Morphological integration; TPS

Indexed keywords

ARCHEOLOGY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENE POOL; GEOMETRY; HISTORY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MEXICO; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; MORPHOMETRICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; SKULL;

EID: 33144460385     PISSN: 00029483     EISSN: 10968644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20291     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aguirre Beltrán G. 1972. La población negra de México. Estudio etnohistórico. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
2. Baume R, Crawford MH. 1978. Discrete dental traits in four Tlaxcaltecan Mexican populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 49:351-360.
3. Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bookstein FL. 1996. Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, editors. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum Press, p 131-151.
5. Bookstein FL, Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Prossinger H, Schaefer K, Seidler H. 2003. Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution. J Hum Evol 44:167-187.
6. Bräuer G. 1988. Osteometrie. In: Martin R, Knussmann R, editors. Handbuch der Vergleichenden. Biologie des Menchen. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, p 160-232.
7. Cerda-Flores RM, Villalobos-Torres MC, Barrera-Saldana HA, Cortes-Prieto LM, Barajas LO, Rivas F, Carracedo A, Zhong Y, Barton SA, Chakraborty R. 2002. Genetic admixture in three Mexican mestizo populations based on DS180 and HLA-DQA1 loci. Am J Hum Biol 14:257-263.
8. Chakraborty R. 1986. Gene admixture in human populations: models and predictions. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 29:1-43.
9. Chakraborty R. 1990. Quantitative traits in relation to population structure: why and how are they used and what do they imply? Hum Biol 62:147-162.
10. Cheverud JM. 1995. Morphological integration in the saddle-back tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) cranium. Am Nat 145:63-89.
11. Cole TM III. 2002. WinEDMA: software for Euclidean distance matrix analysis. Version 1.0.1 beta. Kansas City. Kansas City School of Medicine, University of Missouri.
12. Crawford MH. 1998. The origins of Native Americans. Evidence from anthropological genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Crawford MH, Devor EJ. 1980. Population structure and admixture in transplanted Tlaxcaltecan populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 52:485-490.
14. Díez de la Calle J. 1932. Memorial y noticias sacras y reales de las Indias Occidentales. Mexico City: Bibliófilos Mexicanos.
15. Domínguez Olivier Y. 1984. Los dermatoglifos como indicadores de mestizaje en Mexico. Tesis de Licenciatura. Mexico City: Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia.
16. Dry den IL, Mardia KV. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
17. Faulhaber J. 1955. Antropología física de Veracruz. Mexico City: Gobierno de Veracruz.
18. Futuyma DJ. 1986. Evolutionary biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
19. Garralda MD, Mesa MS. 1984. Variabilité morphologique dans la Péninsule Ibérique: épipaleolithique-âge ancien. Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris 1:207-220.
20. García Martínez B. 1990. Pueblos de Indios, pueblos de Castas: new settlements and traditional corporate organization in eighteenth century New Spain in the Indian community of colonial Mexico. Amsterdam: CEDLA.
21. Gibson C. 1961. Los Aztecas bajo el dominio español (1513-1810). Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.
22. Giesen EB, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TM. 2003. Reduced mechanical load decreases the density, stiffness, and strength of cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle. Clin Biomech 18:358-363.
23. González-José R, Van der Molen S, González- Pérez E, Hernández M. 2004. Patterns of phenotypic covariation and correlation in modern humans as viewed from morphological integration. Am J Phys Anthropol 123:69-77.
24. Goodall CR. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J R Stat Soc [B] 53:285-339.
25. Jantz RL. 1974. Microevolutionary change in Arikara crania: a multivariate analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 38:15-26.
26. Key P, Jantz RL. 1981. A multivariate analysis of temporal change in Ankara craniometrics: a methodological approach. Am J Phys Anthropol 55:247-259.
27. Kiliaridis S. 1995. Masticatory muscle influence on craniofacial growth. Acta Odontol Scand 53:196-202.
28. Konigsberg LW. 2000. Quantitative variation and genetics. In: Stinson S, Bogin B, Huss-Ashmore R, O'Rourke D, editors. Human biology: an evolutionary and biocultural perspective. New York: Wiley-Liss. p 135-162.
29. Lalueza Fox C, González Martín A, Vives Civit S. 1996. Cranial variation in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic islands: inferences about the history of the population. Am J Phys Anthropol 99:413-428.
30. Lande R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
31. Lele SR, Cole TM III. 1996. A new test for shape differences when variance-covariance matrices are unequal. J Hum Evol 31:193-212.
32. Lele SR, Richtsmeier JT. 1995. Euclidean distance matrix analysis: confidence intervals for form and growth differences. Am J Phys Anthropol 98:73-86.
33. Lele SR, Richtsmeier JT. 2001. An invariant approach to statistical analysis of shapes. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.
34. Lieberman DE. 1997. Making behavioral and phylogenetic inferences from hominid fossils: considering the developmental influence of mechanical forces. Annu Rev Anthropol 26:185-210.
35. Lieberman DE, Ross CR, Ravosa M. 2000a. The primate cranial base: ontogeny, function and integration. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 43:117-169.
36. Lieberman DE, Mowbray KM, Pearson OMJ. 2000b. Basicranial influences on overall cranial shape. J Hum Evol 38:291-315.
37. Lieberman DE, Krovitz GE, Yates FW, Devlin M, St. Claire M. 2004. Effects of food processing on masticatory strain and craniofacial growth in a retrognathic face. J Hum Evol 46:655-677.
38. Lisker R, Pérez RB, Granados J, Babinsky V, Rubens J, Armendares S, Buentello L. 1986. Gene frequencies and admixture estimates in a Mexico City population. Am J Phys Anthropol 71:203-207.
39. Lisker R, Ramírez E, Babinsky V. 1996. Genetic structure of autochthonous populations of Meso-America: Mexico. Hum Biol 6:395-404.
40. Liu J, Mercer JM, Stam LF, Gibson GC, Zeng ZB, Laurie CC. 1996. Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritania. Genetics 142:1129-1145.
41. López Alonso S. 1990. Datos dermatoglíficos de una muestra de población mestiza de la Ciudad de Móxico. Est Anthropol Biol 5:275-286.
42. Manly BFJ. 1994. Multivariate statistical methods. A primer. London: Chapman and Hall.
43. Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE. 1996. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum Press.
44. Márquez Morfín L. 1993. La evolución cuantitativa de la población novohispana: siglos XVI, XVII y XVIII. In: Arenzana A, editor. El poblamiento de México. Una visión histórico- demográfica. El México colonial. Mexico City: Secretaría de Gobernación, Consejo Nacional de Población. p 36-63.
45. Marroig G, Cheverud JM. 2001. A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of New World monkeys. Evolution 55:2576-2600.
46. Olson EC, Miller RL. 1958. Morphological Integration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Pucciarelli H, Dressino V, Niveiro MH. 1990. Changes in skull components of the squirrel monkey evoked by growth and nutrition: an experimental study. Am J Phys Anthropol 81:535-543.
48. Pucciarelli H, Mune MC, Oyhenart EE, Orden AB, Villanueva ME, Rodríguez RR, Pons ER. 2000. Growth of skeletal components in the young squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus boliviensis): a longitudinal experiment. Am J Phys Anthropol 112:57-68.
49. Relethford JH. 2002. Apportionment of global human genetic diversity based on craniometrics and skin color. Am J Phys Anthropol 118:393-398.
50. Relethford JH. 2004. Boas and beyond: migration and craniometric variation. Am J Hum Biol 16:379-386.
51. Richtsmeier JT, Burke Deleon V, Lele SR. 2002. The promise of geometric morhometrics. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 45:63-91.
52. Rohlf FJ. 1990. Rotational fit (Procrustes) methods. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL, editors. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, p 227-236.
53. Rohlf FJ. 1998a. tpsDig. New York: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
54. Rohlf FJ. 1998b. tpsSmall version 1.20. New York: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
55. Rohlf FJ. 1998c. On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Syst Biol 47:147-158.
56. Rohlf FJ. 2003a. tpsRelw version 1.35. New York: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
57. Rohlf FJ. 2003b. tpsRegr version 1.28. New York: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
58. Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Tree 8:129-132.
59. Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 1990. Extensions of Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40-59.
60. Ross AH, Slice DE, Ubelaker DH, Falsetti AB. 2004. Population affinities of 19th century Cuban crania: implications for identification criteria in South Florida Cuban Americans. J Forensic Sci 49:1-6.
61. Salzano FM, Bortolini MC. 2002. The evolution and genetics of Latin American populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Sanchez Albornoz N. 1973. La población de América Latina. Desde los tiempos precolombinos al año 2000. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.
63. Sans M. 2000. Admixture studies in Latin America: from the 20th to the 21st century. Hum Biol 72:155-177.
64. Serrano C. 1982. Dermatoglifos de coras, huicholes y mestizos de la Sierra Norte de Nayarit, México. Est Antropol Biol 1:162.
65. Sparks CS, Jantz RL. 2002. A reassessment of human cranial plasticity: Boas revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:14636-14639.
66. Stojanowski CM. 2003. Differential phenotypic variability among the Apalachee mission populations of La Florida: a diachronic perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol 120:352-363.
67. Stojanowski CM. 2004. Population history of native groups in pre- and postcontact Spanish Florida: aggregation, gene flow, and genetic drift on the Southeastern US Atlantic coast. Am J Phys Anthropol 123:316-332.
68. Tiburcio V, Romero A, De Garay AL. 1978. Gene frequencies and racial admixture in a Mestizo population from Mexico City. Ann Hum Biol 5:131-138.
69. Velasco MP. 1993. La migración ibérica y africana: características e impactos regionales. In: Arenzana A, editor. El poblamiento de México. Una visión histórico- demográfica. El México colonial. Mexico City: Secretaría de Gobernación, Consejo Nacional de Población. p 64-85.
70. Wijsman EM, Cavalli-Sforza LL. 1984. Migration and genetic population structure with special reference to humans. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:279-301.
71. Wijsman EM, Neves WA. 1986. The use of nonmetric variation in estimating human population admixture: a test case with Brazilian blacks, whites, and mulattos. Am J Phys Anthropol 70:395-405.
72. Wood B, Lieberman DE. 2001. Craniodental variation in Paranthropus boisei: a developmental and functional perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol 116:13-25.