Show me how you act on a diagram aed I'll tell you what you think (or: Spatial stracfares as orgganizng schemes in collaborative human-computer reasoning)

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-05-06, Issue , 2005, Pages 77-82

  Bertel, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

ASYMMETRIC REASONING SITUATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL PARTNERS; HUMAN-COMPUTER REASONING;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 32944462149     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Bertel, S., Freksa, C., & Vrachliotis, G. (2004). Aspectualize and conquer in architectural design. In J. S. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Knight (Eds), Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design III (pp. 255-279). University of Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
2. Brandt, S. A., & Stark, L. W. (1997). Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 27-38.
3. Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-process model of working memory. In P. Shah, & A. Miyake (Eds), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (pp. 62-101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Engel, D., Bertel, S., & Barkowsky, T. (2004). Spatial principles in control of focus in reasoning with mental representations, images, and diagrams. In Spatial Cognition IV (pp. 181-203). LNCS, Berlin: Springer Verlag (to appear).
5. Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Freksa, C., & Barkowsky, T. (1999). On the duality and on the integration of propositional and spatial representations. In G. Rickheit & C. Habel (Eds), Mental Models in Discourse Processing and Reasoning (pp. 195-212). Amsterd.: Elsevier.
7. Giordano, D. (2002). Evolution of interactive graphical representations into a design language: a distributed cognition account. Intl Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 317-345.
8. Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Design Studies, 4, 123-143.
9. Goldschmidt, G. (1995). The designer as a team of one. Design Studies, 16, 189-209.
10. Gorayska, B., & Mey, J. L. (1996). Of minds and men. In B. Gorayska and J. L. Mey, (Eds), Cognitive Technology: In Search of a Humane Interface (pp. 1-24). Amsterd.: Elsevier.
11. Healey, P. G. T., Swoboda, N., Umata, I. and Katagiri, Y. (2002). Graphical representation in graphical dialogue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 375-395.
12. Hegarty, M. (2000). Capacity limits in diagrammatic reasoning. In M. Anderson, P. Cheng., & V. Haarslev (Eds), Theory and application of diagrams (pp. 194-206). Berlin: Springer.
13. Heiser, J., & Tversky, B. (2004). Characterizing diagrams produced by individuals and dyads. In Spatial Cognition IV (pp. 214-223). LNCS, Berlin: Springer Verlag (to appear).
14. Hommel, B., Daum, I., & Kluwe, R. H. (2004). Exorcizing the homunculus, phase two: Editors' introduction. Acta Psychologica, 115, 99-104.
15. Hunt, E. (1991). Some comments on the study of complexity. In R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensch (Eds), Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms (pp. 383-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Ishai, A., & Sagi, D. (1995). Common mechanisms of visual imagery and perception. Science, 268, 1772-1774.
17. Ishai, A., & Sagi, D. (1997). Visual imagery facilitates visual perception: Psychophysical evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 (4), 476-489.
18. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19. Kavakli, M. and Gero, J. S. (2001). Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies, 22, 347-364.
20. Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31-68.
21. Knauff, M., Rauh, R. and Schlieder, C. (1995). Preferred mental models in qualitative spatial reasoning: A cognitive assessment of Allen's calculus. In Proc. of the Seventeenth Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 200-205). Erlbaum.
22. Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47-60.
23. Kosslyn, S. M., & Sussman, A. L. (1995). Roles of imagery in perception: Or, there is no such thing as immaculate perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1035-1042). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Laeng, B., & Teodorescu, D. (2002). Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual sconce. Cognitive Science, 26, 207-231.
25. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cogn Sci, 11, 65-99.
26. Logie, R. H. (2001). Working memory: A mental space for design and discovery. In J. S. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Purcell (Eds), Visual and spatial reasoning in design II (pp. 223-235). University of Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
27. Moore, C. J. (2000). Collaborative and concurrent engineering in the construction industry. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 74, 201-202.
28. Nobre, A. C., Coull, J. T., Maquet, P., Frith, C. D., Vandenberghe, R., & Mesulam, M. M. (2004). Orienting attention to locations in perceptual versus mental representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 (3), 363-373.
29. Oh, Y., Gross, M. D., & Do, E. (2004). Critiquing free-hand sketching. In J. S. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Knight (Eds), Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design III (pp. 105-120). University of Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Comp. and Cognition.
30. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery & Verbal Processes. Holt, Rhinehart & Wilson.
31. Purcell, A. T, & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process. Design Studies, 19, 389-430.
32. Randell, D. A., Cui, Z., & Cohn, A. G. (1992). A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In B. Nebel, W. Swartout, & C. Rich (Eds), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proc. of the 3rd International Conference (KR-92) (pp. 165-176). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
33. Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996) External cognition: How do graphical representations work?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185-213.
34. Schill, K., Umkehrer, E., Beinlich, S., Krieger, G., & Zetzsche, C. (2001). Scene analysis with saccadic eye movements: top-down and bottom-up modeling. Journal of Electronic Imaging, Special Issue on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, 10 (1), 152-160.
35. Schlieder, C., & Hagen, C. (2000). Interactive layout generation with a diagrammatic constraint language. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds), Spatial cognition II - Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal methods, and practical applications (pp. 198-211). Berlin: Springer.
36. Schon, D. A. & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their function in designing. Design Studies, 13, 135-156.
37. Seifert, I., Beitel, S., & Barkowsky, T. (2004). Assistance for spatio-temporal planning in ubiquitous computing environments based on mental models. In J. Baus, C. Kray, & R. Porzel (Eds), Proceedings of AIMS'04 - Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Mobile Systems (pp. 9-14).
38. Shimojima, A. (1996). Operational constraints in diagrammatic reasoning. In Allwein, & Barwise (Eds), Logical reasoning with diagrams (pp. 27-48). Oxford: University Press.
39. Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19, 97-140.
40. Suwa, M., Purcell, T., & Gero, J. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19, 455-483.
41. Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18, 385-403.
42. Verstijnen, I. M., van Leeuwen, C., Goldschmidt, G., Hamel, R., & Hennessey, J. M. (1998). Creative discovery in imagery and perception: Combining is relatively easy, restructuring takes a sketch. Acta Psychologica, 99, 177-200.
43. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625-636.