Graphical representation in graphical dialogue

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 375-395

  Healey, Patrick G T ^a   Swoboda, Nik ^b   Umata, Ichiro ^c   Katagiri, Yasuhiro ^c  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; SEMANTICS;

GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 0036817351     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1022     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bly, S. (1988). A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings. Cscw '88: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-supported Co-operative Work, pp. 250-256. New York: ACM Press.
3. Bly, S. & Minneman, S. (1990). Commune: a shared drawing surface. ACM Sigois Buff. Proceedings of the Conference on Office Information Systems, 11(2-3), pp. 184-192. New York: ACM Press.
4. Brannigan, H., Pickering, M. & Cleland, A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, 13-25.
5. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Clark, H.H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
7. Clark, H.H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1990). Referring as a collaborative process. In P.R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M.E. Pollack, Eds. Intentions in Communication, pp. 463-494. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Engle, R. (1998). Not channels bat composite signals: speech, gesture, diagrams and object demonstrations are integrated in multimodal explanations. In M. Gernsbacher & S. Derry, Eds., Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 321-326. Mahwah, N.Y.: Lea.
9. Garrod, S.C. & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic coordination. Cognition, 27, 181-218.
10. Greenberg, S., Hayne, S. & Rada, R. (1995). Groupware for Realtime Drawing: a Designer's Guide. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
11. Healey, P., Mccabe, R., & Katagiri, Y. (2000). A comparison of graphics and speech in a task-oriented dialogue. In M. Anderson, P. Cheng & V. Haarslev, Eds. Theory and Application of Diagrams. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference, Diagrams 2000, Vol. 1889, pp. 245-256. Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin: Springer.
12. Healey, P., Swoboda, N., Umata, I. & Katagiri, Y. (2001). Representational form and communicative use. In J. Moore & K. Stenning, Eds. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 411-416. Mahwah, N.Y.: Lea.
13. Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Lyon, J. (1995a). Communicative drawing: an augmentative mode of interaction. Aphasiology, 9, 84-94.
15. Lyon, J. (1995b). Drawing: its value as a communication aid for adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 9, 34-50.
16. Neilson, I. & Lee, J. (1994). Conversations with graphics: implications for the design of natural language/graphics interfaces, international Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 509-541.
17. Sacchet, C. (2002). Drawing in aphasia: Moving towards the interactive. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. X-ref: S1071-5819(02)00084-8.
18. Sacchett, C., Byng, M., Marshall, J. & Pound, C. (1999). Drawing together: evaluation of a therapy programme for severe aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34, 265-289.
19. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
20. Scaife, M. & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: how do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185-213.
21. Schegloff, E.A. (1992). Repair after the next turn: the last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295-1345.
22. Sommers, P. Van (1984). Drawing and Cognition: Descriptive and Experimental Studies of Graphic Production Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D., Kahn, K., Lanning, S. & Suchman, L. (1987). Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings. Communications of the ACM, 30, 32-47.
24. Tang, J., & Minneman, S. (1991). Videodraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9, 170-184.
25. Tversky, B. (1995). Cognitive origins of graphic conventions. In F. Marchese, Ed. Understanding Images, pp. 29-53. New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. Whittaker, S., Geelhoed, E. & Robinson, E. (1993). Shared workspaces: how do they work and when are they useful? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 813-842.
27. Wilkes-Gibbs, D. & Clark, H.H. (1992). Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 183-194.