Relationship between opportunity to learn and student performance on english and algebra assessments

Educational Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 307-332

  Boscardin, Christy Kim ^a   Aguirre Muñoz, Zenaida ^a   Stoker, Ginger ^a   Jinok Kim, Mikyung Kim ^a   Lee, Janet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32944457120     PISSN: 10627197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326977ea1004_1     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Baker, E. L., Linn, R., Herman, J. L., & Koretz, D. (2002). Standards for educational accountability systems (Policy Brief 5). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
2. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Achieving our goals: Superficial or structural reforms? Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 286-295. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ418155)
4. Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). (1994). Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved July 10, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/
6. Goals 2000: Educate America Act, Pub. L. No. 103-227, 108 Stat. 125, (1994).
7. Gross, W. (1993). Early mathematics performance and achievement: Results of a study within a large suburban school system. Journal of Negro Education, 62, 269-287.
8. Herman, J. L., Klein, D. C. D., & Abedi, J. (2000). Assessing students' opportunity to learn: Teacher and student perspectives. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19(4), 16-24.
9. Jackson, K. W. (1982, March). Achievement differences in mathematics: A search for causal explanations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Black Studies, Chicago.
10. Kozol, J. (2000). Forward. In J. Cohen & J. Rogers (Eds.), Will standards save public education? (pp. vii-xiii). Boston: Beacon Press.
11. McDonnell, L. M. (1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 305-322.
12. Muthén, B. O., Kao, C. F., & Burstein, L. (1991). Instructionally sensitive psychometrics: Application of a new IRT-based detection technique to mathematics achievement test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 1-22.
13. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
14. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
15. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Oakes, J. (1989). What education indicators? The case for assessing the school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 181-199.
17. Paige, R. (2002). U.S. Department of Education Secretary of Education's address to the First Annual Teacher Quality Evaluation conference, Washington, DC. Retrieved June 7, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2002/06/061102. html
18. Porter, A. C. (1991). Creating a system of school process indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 13-29.
19. Porter, A. C. (1995). The uses and misuses of opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Researcher, 24(1), 21-27.
20. Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3-14.
21. Quality Counts 2003: If I can't learn from you . . . . Ensuring a highly qualified teacher in every classroom. (2003). Education Week, 22(17). Retrieved July 10, 2004, from www.edweek.org/sreports/qc03/
22. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shavelson, R. J., Hamilton, L., & Klein, S. (2002). On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 369-393.
23. Saxe, G. B., Gearhart, M., & Seltzer, M. (1999). Relations between classroom practices and student learning in the domain of fractions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 1-24.
24. Wang, J. (1998). Opportunity to learn: The impacts and policy implications. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 137-156.
25. Wang, J., & Goldschmidt, P. (1999). Opportunity to learn, language proficiency, and immigrant status effects on mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 101-111.
26. Wayne, A. (2002). Teacher inequality: New evidence on disparities in teachers' academic skills. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(30). Retrieved July 10, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/eepa/v10n30/
27. Yoon, B., Burstein, L., Chen, Z., & Kim, K. S. (1990). Patterns in teacher reports of topic coverage and their effects on math achievement: Comparisons across years (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 309). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED316418)