Opportunity to learn, language proficiency, and immigrant status effects on mathematics achievement

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 101-111

  Wang, Jia ^a   Goldschmidt, Pete ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347359140     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220679909597634     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aitkin, M, & Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modeling issues in school effectiveness studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 149(1), 1-43
2. Baratz-Snowden, J. C. (1993). Opportunity to learn: Implications for professional development. Journal of Negro Education, 62, 311-323
3. Blank, R. K., & Dalkilic, M. (1990). State indicators of science and mathematics education 1990. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Offices, State Education Assessment Center
4. Blank, R. K., & Engler, P. (1992). Has science and mathematics education improved since “A Nation at Risk?”: Trends in course enrollment, qualified teachers, and student achievement. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Offices, State Education Assessment Center
5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
6. Bryk, T, Lee, V., & Smith, J. (1990). High school organization and its effects on teachers and students: An interpretive summary of the research. In W. H. Clune & J. F. White (Eds.), Choice and control in American education (pp. 135-226). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer
7. Burstein, L., & Winters, L. (1994). Models for collecting and using data on opportunity to learn at the state level: OTL options for the CCSSO & ASS science assessment. Paper presented at the Workshop on Models for Collecting and Using Opportunity to Learn at the State Level, CCSSO National Conference on Large Scale Assessment, Albuquerque, NM
8. California State Department of Education. (1984). California high school curriculum study: Paths through high school. Sacramento, CA: Author
9. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally
10. Center for Language Minority Education & Research. (1996). Comprehensive services for secondary immigrant students demonstration project outcomes report. Long Beach, CA: The Andrew F. Mellon Foundation, Program in Immigrant Education
11. Clune, W. H., & White, P. A. (1992). Education reform in the trenches: Increased academic coursetakings in high schools with lower achieving students in states with higher graduation requirements. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 2-20
12. Cummins, J. (1989). Language and literacy acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 10(1), 17-31
13. Hardy, M. (1993). Regression with dummy variables. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
14. Jones, L. V., Davenport, E. C., Bryson, A., Bekhuis, T., & Zwick, R. (1986), Mathematics and science test scores as related to courses taken in high school and other factors. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 197-208
15. Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design. Pacific Grove, CA: Books-Cole
16. Lee, V. E., Chow-Hoy, T. K., Burkam, D. T., Geverdt, D., & Smerdon, B. A. (1998). Sector differences in high school course taking: A private school or Catholic school effect? Sociology of Education, 71, 314-335
17. Lee, V. E., Croninger, R. G., Smith, J. B. (1997). Course-taking, equity, and mathematics learning: Testing the constrained curriculum hypothesis in U.S. secondary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 79(2), 99-121
18. McDonnell, L. M. (1988). Coursework policy in five states and its implications for indicator development. Santa Monica, CA: RAND
19. McDonnell, L. M., Burstein, L., Ormseth, T, Catterall, J., & Moody, D. (1990). Discovering what schools really teach: Designing improved coursework indicators (Report No. R3886). Santa Monica, CA: RAND
20. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. (1988). National Educational Longitudinal Survey. Washington, DC: Author
21. National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992). Raising standards for American education: A report to Congress, the Secretary of Education, the National Education Goals Panel, and the American people. Washington, DC: Author
22. Oakes, J. (1989). What educational indicators? The case for assessing the school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 71(2), 181-199
23. O'Day, J. A., & Smith, M. S. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In S, H. Fuhrman (Ed.)., Designing coherent education policy (pp. 250-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
24. Osgood, W. D., & Smith, G. (1995). Applying hierarchical linear modeling to extended longitudinal evaluations. Evaluation Review, 19(1), 3-39
25. Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
26. Porter, A. C. (1991). Creating a system of school process indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(1), 13-29
27. Powell, A. G., Farrar, E., & Cohen, D. K. (1985). The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
28. Raizen, S. A., & Jones, L. V. (Eds.). (1985). Indicators of precollege education in science and mathematics: A preliminary review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
29. Ramirez, D., Yuen, R., Ramey, R., & Pasta, D. (1991). The immersion study: Final report. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement
30. Rogosa, D. R., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726-748
31. Sebring, P. A. (1984, April). Course taking and achievement: Findings and implications for curricular policy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans
32. Wang, J. (1998). Opportunity to learn: The impacts and policy implications. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(3), 137-156
33. Winfield, L. F. (1991). Resilience, schooling and development among African American youth. Education and Urban Society, 24(1), 5-14
34. Winters, L., Burstein, L., Ang, A., Jo, B., Wang Moody, J., & Leonard, J, (1994). What we know about opportunity to learn: Tracking the technical terrain. Paper presented at the 1994 annual CRESST conference, Los Angeles, CA