Modelling the infiltration process with a multi-layer perceptron artificial neural network

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 3-20

  Sy, Nestor L ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Infiltration; Multilayer perceptron; Rainfall simulator

Indexed keywords

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOISTURE; MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORKS; RAIN; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOILS; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

INFILTRATION MODEL; RAINFALL SIMULATOR; SOIL MOISTURE;

INFILTRATION;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; INFILTRATION;

EID: 32544458461     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.51.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abdul-Wahah, S. A., & Al-Alawi, S. M. (2002) Assessment and prediction of tropospheric ozone corcentration levels using artificial neural networks. Envir. Modell. Softmare 17, 219-228.
2. Anctil, F., Michel, C., Perrin, C. & Andréassian, V. (2004) A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for stream flow forecasting. J. Hydrol. 286, 155-167.
3. Anderson, M. G. & Burt, T. P. (1990) Process studies in hillslope hydrology: an overview. In: Process Studiex in Hillslope Hydrology (ed. by M. G. Anderson & T. P. Burt), 1-9. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.
4. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000a) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I. Preliminary concepts. J. Hydrol. Engng ASCE 5(2), 115-123
5. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000b) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II. Hydrologic applications. J. Hydol. Engng ASCE 5(2), 124-137
6. Bandibas, J. C. & Kohyama, K. (2001) An efficient artificial neural network training method through induced learning retardation: inhibited brain learning, Asian J. Geoinformatics 1(4), 45-55.
7. Cameron, D., Kneale, P. & See, L. (2002) An evaluation of a traditional and a neural net modeling approach to flood forecasting for an upland catchment. Hydrol. Processes 16, 1033-1046.
8. Cerdà A. (1997) Seasonal changes of the infiltration rates in a Mediterranean scrubland on limestone. J. Hydrol. 198, 209-225.
9. Cigizoglu, H. K. (2004) Estimatian and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data by multi-layer perceptrons. Adv. Water Resour. 27, 185-195.
10. Chow, V. T., Maidment, D.R. & Mays, L. W. (1988) Applied Hyrology. McGraw-Hill Book Comparay, New York, USA.
11. Dawson, C. W. & Wilby, R. (2001) Hyrologocal modeling using artificial neural networks. Progr. Php. Geogr. 25, 80-18.
12. Fahlman, S. E. (1988) Fast learning variations of back-propagations: an empirical Proc. 1988 Consectionist Models Summer School, 38-51, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, California, USA.
13. Fernando, D., Achela, K. & Jayawardena, A. W. (1998) Runoff forecasting using RBF networks with OLS algorithm J. Hydrol. Engng ASCE 3(3), 203-209.
14. German, S., Bienenstock, E. & Doursart, R. (1992) Neural networks and the bias/variance, dilemma. Neural Comp. 4, 1-58.
15. Green, W. H. & Ampt, G. A. (1911) Studies in soil physics. I. Flow of air and water through soils. J. Agric. Sci. 4, 1-24.
16. Hanson, S. J., Cowan, J. D. & Giles, C. L. (1993) Advances In Neural Information Systems, vol. 5. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, California, USA.
17. Harden, C. P. & Scruggs, P. D. (2003) Infiltration on mountain slopes: a comparison of three environments. Geomorphol. 55, 5-24.
18. Horton, R. E. (1933) The role of infiltration in the hydrological cycle. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 14, 446-460.
19. Horton, R. E. (1940) An approach toward a physical interpretation of infiltrationt capacity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 5, 399-417.
20. Islam, S. & Kothari R. (2000) Artificial neural networks in remote sensing of hydrologic processes. J. Hydrol. Engng ASCE 5(2), 138-144.
21. Klute, A. (1986) Methods of Soil Analysis; Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods (second edn). American Soc. of Agron., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
22. Kostiakov, A. N. (1932) On the dynamics of the coefficient of water-perccolation in soils and on the necessity of studying it forn a dynamic point of view far purposes of amelioration. Trans. Sixth Comm. ofthe Int. Soc. of Soil Sci., Part A, 17-31.
23. LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Orr, G. B. & Müller, K. R. (1998) Efficient back Prop. In Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade (ed. by G. B. Orr & K. R. Müller), 9-53. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
24. Maier, H. R. & Dandy, G. C. (1998) Understanding the behavior and optimising the performance of back-propagation neural networks: an empirical study. Envir. Mudell. Software 13, 179-191.
25. Maier, H. R. & Dandy, G. C. (2001) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications, Envir. Modell. Software 15, 101-124.
26. Martin, D. A. & Moody, J. A. (2001) Comparison of soil infiltration rates in burned and unburned mountainous watersheds. Hydrol. Processes 15, 2893-2903.
27. Minns, A. W. & Hall, M. J. (1996) Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol. Sci. J. 41(3), 399-417.
28. Mishra, S. K, Tyagi, J. V. & Singh, V. P. (2003) Comparison of infiltration models. Hydrol. Processes 17, 2629-2652.
29. Orr. G. B. & Müller, K. R. (1998) (eds) Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
30. Philip, J. R. (1957) Theory of Infilltration. Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, Australia.
31. Principe, J. C., Euliano, N. R. & Lefebvre, W. C. (2000) Neural and Adaptive Systems: Fundamentals through Simulations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.
32. Rajurkar, M. P., Kothyari, U. C. & Chaube, U. C. (2004) Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network. J. Hydrol. 285, 96-113.
33. Rawls, W. J., Ahuja, L. R., Brakensiek, D. J. & Shirmohammadi A. (1993) Infiltration and soil water movement Chapter 5 in: Handbook of Hydrology (ed. by D. R. Maidment), McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, USA.
34. Richards, L. A. (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics 1, 318-333.
35. Shin, H. S. & Salas, J. D. (2000) Regional drought analysis based an neural networks. J. Hydrol. Engng ASCE 5(2), 145-155.
36. Sudheer, K. P. & Jain, S. K. (2003) Radial basis function neural network for modeling rating curves. J. Hydrol. Engng ASCES 8(3), 161-164.
37. Sudheer, K. P., Gossin, A. K. & Rangan, D. M. (2002) A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol. Processes 16, 1325-1330,
38. Suen, J. P. & Eheart, J. W. (2003) Evaluation of neural networks far modeling nitrate concentration in rivers. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage 129(6), 505-510.
39. Sy, N. L. (2004) Artificial neural network modeling of infiltration from plot-scale rainfall simulator data. Hydroinformatics (ed. by S.Y. Liong K. K. Phoon & V. Babovic) (Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. on Hydroinformatics, June 2004), 1433-1440. World Scientific Publishing Co., Pte. Ltd., Singapore.
40. Sy, N. L. & Calo, E T. (2001) Utilization of the USC-CED field rainfall simulator as a research tool for understanding the infiltration process of the hydrologic cycle. In:Proc. Fourth National Civil Engng Education Congress (De La Salle Univ., Manila, Philippines, 2-4 May 2001). De La Salle Univ. Press, Manila, Philippines.
41. Tokar, A. S. & Momcilo, M. (2000) Precipitation-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks and conceptual models, J. Hydrol. Engng ASCE 5(20), 156-161.
42. Trajkovic, S., Todorovic, B. & Stankovic, M. (2003) Forecasting of reference evapotranspiration by artificial neural networks. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. ASCE 128(6), 454-457.
43. Zapranis, A. & Refenes, A. P. (1999) Principles of Neural Model Identification, Selection and Adequacy with Application to Financial Econometrics Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
44. Zhang, B. & Govindaraju, R. S. (2003) Geomorphology-based artificial neural networks (GANN) far estimation of direct runoff over watershed, J. Hydrol. 273, 18-34.