A universal evolutionary index for amino acid changes

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1548-1556

  Tang, Hua ^a   Wyckoff, Gerald J ^b   Lu, Jian ^a   Wu, Chung I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amino acid change; Amino acid substitution; Genetic code; Protein evolution

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS; EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID BASE SUBSTITUTION; PRIMATE; RODENT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES PARADOXUS; YEAST;

AMINO ACIDS; ANIMALS; CODON; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; PRIMATES; RATS; YEASTS;

CERCOPITHECIDAE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS; MELANOGASTER; PRIMATES; RODENTIA; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES PARADOXUS;

EID: 3242768556     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh158     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Altschul, S. F., and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Protein database searches for multiple alignments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:5509-5513.
2. Bamshad, M., and S. P. Wooding. 2003. Signatures of natural selection in the human genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:99-111.
3. Bustamante, C. D., J. P. Townsend, and D. L. Hartl. 2000. Solvent accessibility and purifying selection within proteins of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:301-308.
4. Chasman, D., and R. M. Adams. 2001. Predicting the functional consequences of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms: structure-based assessment of amino acid variation. J. Mol. Biol. 307:683-706.
5. Dayhoff M.O., R. M. Schwartz, and B. C. Orcutt. 1978. Atlas of protein sequence and structure. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.
6. Doolittle, R. F. 1979. Protein evolution. Pp.1-118 in H. Neurath and R. L. Hill, eds. The proteins. Academic Press, New York.
7. Fay, J. C., G. J. Wyckoff, and C. I. Wu. 2001. Positive and negative selection on the human genome. Genetics 158:1227-1234.
8. -. 2002. Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila. Nature 415:1024-1026.
9. Fitch, W. M., R. M. Bush, C. A. Bender, and N. G. Cox. 1997. Long term trends in the evolution of H(3) HA1 human influenza type A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7712-7718.
10. Genetics Computer Group. 1999. The Wisconsin Package. Version 10.0. Madison, Wis.
11. Golding, G. B., and A. M. Dean. 1998. The structural basis of molecular adaptation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:355-369.
12. Goldman, N., and Z. Yang. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:725-736.
13. Grantham, R. 1974. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 185:862-864.
14. Graur, D. 1985. Amino acid composition and the evolutionary rates of protein-coding genes. J. Mol. Evol. 22:53-62.
15. Hellmann, I., S. Zollner, W. Enard, I. Ebersberg, B. Nickel, and S. Paabo. 2003. Selection on human genes as revealed by comparisons to chimpanzee cDNA. Genome Res. 13:831-837.
16. Henikoff, S., and J. G. Henikoff. 1993. Performance evaluation of amino acid substitution matrices. Proteins 17:49-61.
17. Hughes, A. L., and M. Nei. 1988. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature 335:167-170.
18. Kellis, M., N. Patterson, M. Endrizzi, B. Birren, and E. S. Lande. 2003. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423:241-254.
19. Li, W. H. 1993. Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution. J Mol Evol 36:96-99.
20. Li, W. H., C. I. Wu, and C. C. Luo. 1985. A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2:150-174.
21. Makalowski, W., and M. S. Boguski. 1998. Evolutionary parameters of the transcribed mammalian genome: an analysis of 2,820 orthologous rodent and human sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:9407-9412.
22. McDonald, J. H., and M. Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652-654.
23. Miyata, T., S. Miyazawa, and T. Yasunaga. 1979. Two types of amino acid substitutions in protein evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 12:219-236.
24. Muse, S. V., and B. S. Gaut. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:715-724.
25. Nei, M., and T. Gojobori. 1986. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:418-426.
26. Nielsen, R., and Z. Yang. 1998. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148:929-936.
27. Suzuki, Y., and T. Gojobori. 1999. A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1315-1328.
28. Wyckoff, G. J., W. Wang, and C. I. Wu. 2000. Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature 403:304-309.
29. Yang, Z., and R. Nielsen. 1998. Synonymous and nonsynonymous rate variation in nuclear genes of mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 46:409-418.
30. Yang, Z., R. Nielsen, N. Goldman, and A. M. Pedersen. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-449.
31. Yang, Z., R. Nielsen, and M. Hasegawa. 1998. Models of amino acid substitution and applications to mitochondrial protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1600-1611.
32. Yang, Z., and W. J. Swanson. 2002. Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:49-57.
33. Zhang, J. 2000. Rates of conservative and radical nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions in mammalian nuclear genes. J. Mol. Evol. 50:56-68.