1.3 Nursing information technology: Classifications and management

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 65, Issue , 2002, Pages 21-44

  Saba, Virginia K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH; REVIEW; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN NURSES' ASSOCIATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH; REFERENCE STANDARDS; UNITED STATES; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 3242724403     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-909-7-21     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Saba, VK, A new nursing vision: The infonnation highway. Nursing Leadership Forum, (1995) 1 (2): 44-51.
2. Saba, VK, & McCormick, KA, Essentials of computers for nurses. NY: McGraw-Hill (1996).
3. van Bemmel, J. H, & Musen, MA, (Eds.). Handbook of medical informatics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag{1997).
4. Zielstorff, RD, Hudgings, CI, & Grobe, S. ]. Next-generation nursing infonnation systems: Essential characteristics for professional practice. Washington, DC: ANA (1993).
5. McCormick, KA, Lang, N, Zielstorff, R, MilhoUand, DK, Saba, VK, & Jacox, A. Toward standard classification schemes for nursing language; Recommendations of the American Nurses Association Steering Committee on Databases to Support Clinical Nursing Practice. JAMIA (1994) I: 422-427.
6. International Council of Nurses. The International Classification of Nursing Practice: A unifying framework. : The cdpha version. Geneva, Switzerland: ICN (1996).
7. ANA: Council on Computer Applications in Nursing (CCAIN). Report on the designation of Nursing Informatics as a nursing specialty Washington, DC: ANA (1992).
8. American Nurses Association. Standards of clinical nursing practice. Washington, DC: ANA (1991).
9. Lang, NM, et al. Toward a national database for nursing practice. In NM Lang, (Ed.) Nursing data. systems: The emerging framework (pp. 7-18). Washington, DC: ANA (1995).
10. Fitzpatrick, et al. Translating nursing diagnosis into ICD code. American Journal of Nursing, (1989) 89(4): 493-495.
11. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA). Taxonomy I: Revised 1990: With official nursing diagnoses. St. Louis: NANDA (1990).
12. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: Tenth revision: ICD-IO. GenQva, Switzerland: WHO (1992).
13. Zielstorff, RD, Lang, NM, Saba, VK, McCormick, KA, & Milholland, DK. Toward a uniform language for nursing in the US: Work of the American Nurses Association Steering Committee on Databases to Support Clinical Practice. In RA Greenes, HE Peterson, & DJ Protti, (Eds.). MEDINFO '95 Proceedings of 8&' World Congress IMIA (pp. 1362-1366). Amsterdam: North Holland (1995).
14. Werley, HH, & Lang, NM (Eds.). Identification of nursing minimum data set. New York: Springer Publishing (1988).
15. Werley, HH, Ryan, P, & Zom, CR. The nursing minimum data set (NMDS): A framework for the organization of nursing language. In NM Lang, (Ed) Nursing system data: The emerging framework {pp. 19-32). Washington, DC: ANA (1995).
16. Werley, HH Introduction to the nursing minimum data set and development. In HH Werley, & NM Lang, (Eds.). Identification of nursing minimum data set. Springer Publishing: NY (1988).
17. Leske, J S, & Werley, HH. Use of the minimum data set. Computers in Nursing, (1993) 10(6): 259-263.
18. Warren, JJ, & Hoskins, LM NANDA's nursing diagnosis taxonomy: A nursing database. In NM Lang, (Ed.). Nursing data systems: The emerging framework (pp. 49-59). ANA: Washington, DC: ANA (1995).
19. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. NANDA: Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions & classifications: 1995-1996. Philadelphia: NANDA (1994).
20. Martin, KS, & Sheet, NJ. 77? Omaha System: Applications for commimih' health nursing. Philadelphia: WB Saunders (1992).
21. Martin, KS, & Sheet, NJ. The Omaha System: Nursing diagnoses, interventions, and client outcomes. In NM. Lang, (Ed.). Nursing data systems: Tfie emerging framework, (pp. 105-113). Washington, DC: ANA (1995).
22. Bulecheck, GM, & McCloskey, JC, Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC): A language to describe nursing treatments. In NM Lang, (Ed.). Nursing system data: The emerging framework (pp. 19-32). Washington, DC: ANA (1995).
23. McClosky, JC, & Bulecheck, GM (Eds). Iowa Interyention Project. Nursing intervention classification. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book (1992).
24. Maas, ML, Johnson, M., & Moorhead, S. Image: Joinmal of Nursing Scholarship (1996) 28,(4): 295-30L
25. Daly, JM, Mass, ML, & Johnson, M. Nursing Outcomes Classification: An essential in data sets for nursing and health care effectiveness. Computers in Nursing, (1997) 15 (2 S): S82-S86.
26. Saba, VK. Home Health Care Classification (HHCCs): Nursing Diagnoses and Nursing Interventions. In NM. Lang (Ed.). Nursing system data: The emerging framework {pp. 6\-\04). Washington, DC: ANA (1995).
27. Saba, VK. Why the Home Health Care Classification is a recognized nursing nomenclature. Computers in Nursing, (1997) 15 (2S): S69-S76.
28. Ozbolt, JR. From minimum data to maximum impact: Using clinical data to strengthen patient care. Advanced Practice Nursing Quarterly, (1996) 1, (4): 62-69.
29. Grobe, SJ. Nursing intervention lexicon and taxonomy (NILT). In NM Lang, (Ed.). Nursing system data: The emerging framework {pp. 169-176). Washington, DC: ANA (1995).
30. Humphreys, BL, Lindberg, AB, Schoolman, HM, & Bamett, O. The Unified Medical Language System: An informatics research collaboration. JAMIA, (1998) 5( 1): 1-11.
31. Lindberg, DB, & Humphreys, BL. The UMLS knowledge sources: Tools for building better user interfaces. In RA, Miller, (Ed.). Proceedings of the 14th Annual SCAMC: Standards in medical informatics (pp. 121-125). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press (1990).
32. National Library of Medicine. Unified medical language system: UMLS: knowledge sources (7''' Experimental Ed. }. Bethesda, MD, NLM (1996).
33. National Library of Medicine. Medical Subject Headings (Mesh). Bethesda, MD: NLM (1995).
34. Clark, J. & Lang, NM. Nursing's next advance: An Intemational classification for nursing practice. International Nursing Review, (1992) 3(4): 109-112.
35. International Council of Nurses. Nursing next advance: An International Classification of Nursing Practice (ICNP): A working paper. Geneva, Switzerland: ICN (1993).
36. Mortensen, RA, & Nielsen, GH. Classification of Nursing Phenomena Influencing Health Status. Geneva, Switzerland: ICN (1996).
37. Nielsen, GH. TELENURSE Introduction to ICNP. In RA Mortensen (Ed.). The International Classificationfor Nursing Practice: ICNP (pp. 17-21). Copenhagen, Denmark: The Danish Institute for Health and Nursing Research (1996).
38. Mortensen, RA, et al., Telematics for health care in the European Union. In SJ Grobe; & ESP Pluyetr-Wenting (Eds.). Nursing informatics: An international overview for nursing in a technological era (pp. 750-752). NY: Elsevier (1994).
39. Lange, LL. Representation of everyday clinical nursing language in UMLS and SNOMED. In JJ. Cimino (Ed.). Proceedings ofI996AMIA (140-144). Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus (1996).
40. Henry, SB, Holzmer, WL, Reilly, CA, & Campbell, KE. Terms used by nurses to describe patients problems: Can SNOMED III represent concepts in the patient record? JAMIA, (1994) 1(1): 61-74.
41. Zielstorff, RD, et al. Representation of nursing terminology in the UMLS Metathesaurus: A pilot study. In C. Safi-an. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1 Annual SCAMC (pp. 392-396). NY: McGraw Hill (1993)
42. Warren, J J et al. Analysis of thi-ee coding schemes: Can they capture nursing care plans concepts? In JG, Ozbolt (Ed.). Proceedings of the 18&' Annual SCAMC (p. 962). Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus (1994).
43. Hardiker, NH & Rector, AL, Modeling nursing terminology using the GRAIL representation language. JAMIA, (1998) 5(1): 120-128.
44. Henry, SB, & Mead, CN. Nursing classification systems: necessary but not sufficient for representing &what nurses do& for inclusion in computer-based patient record systems. JAMIA, (1997) 4: 222-232.
45. Parlocha, PK, & Henry, SB. The usefulness of the Georgetown Home Health Care Classification System for coding patient problems and nursing interventions in psychiatric home care. Computers in Nursing, (1998)16 (l):45-52.
46. Hammond, WE. The role of standards in creating a health infonnafion infrastructure. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, (1994) 34: 29-44.
47. American Nurses Association. NIDSEC: Nursing information & data set evaluation center: Standards and scoring guidelines. Washington, DC: ANA (1997).
48. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases: Ninth Revision: ICD-9. Geneva, witzeriand: WHO (1975)
49. Health Care Financing Administration. The International Classification of Diseases: Ninth Revision: Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM): Volumes 1-3. Washington, DC: HCFA (1980).
50. Lambert, H. & Wood, M. (Eds.). International Classification of Primary Care: ICPC. NY: Oxford University Press (1987).
51. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-III-R), 3& Ed. Revised. Washington, DC: APA (1989).
52. American Medical Association. Physicians current procedural terminology: Fourth Edition: CPT. Chicago, AMA( 1996).
53. College of American Pathologists. SNOMED Introduction: The systematized nomenclature of himian and veterinary medicine. Northfield, IL: SNOMED (1993)
54. Bamet, DE. (Ed.). Sharing information: Key issues for the nursing profession. (Vol. 1). (INFOrmed Touch Series). Lincolnshire, England: British Computer Society (1997).
55. Read, JD; Sanderson, HE, & Drennan, YM. Terming, encoding, and grouping. In RA, Greenes, HE. Peterson, & D. Protti (Eds.). MEDINFO'95: Proceeding of the Eighth World Congress on Medical informatics (56-59). NY: North-Holland (1995).
56. Casey, A. The nursing terms project: progress and results. In DE. Bamett (Ed.). Sharing information: Key issues for the nursing profession (pp. 34-40). (Volume 1: INFOrmed Touch Series). Lincolnshire, England: Brotish Computer Society (1997).
57. American National Standards Institute. Report of the ANSI HISB Secretary to the June 12-13th, 1997 HISB Meeting. (HISB 47). NY: ANSI-HISB (1997).
58. ASTM Committee (E31). Medical computing standards: A review of published standards and current projects. ASTM: Philadelphia, PA: ASTM (1992).
59. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Current activities of selected Healthcare Informatics Standards Organizations. Rockville, MD: AHCPR (1997).
60. Hovenga, EJS. Health information technology (IT) standards: The need for an IT policy and strategy. In EJ Hovenga, & GK Whymark (Eds.). HIC '93: Health informatics into the twenty first centuiy (pp. 294-299). Melboume, Australia: Health Informatics Society of Australia (1993).
61. McCormick, KA. et al. The federal and private sector roles in the development of minimum data sets and core health data elements. Computers in Nursing, (1997) 15(2 Supplement): 523-532.
62. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Report: Core health data elements. Washington, DC: GPO Publ No 1996-722-677/83245 (1996).
63. National Association of Home Care. Uniform data set for home care and hospice. Washington, DC: NAHC(1993).