Classifying nursing-sensitive patient outcomes

Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 295-302

  Maas, Meridean L ^a   Johnson, Marion ^a   Moorhead, Sue ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Effectiveness; Nursing sensitive outcomes; Standardized language

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; HUMAN; INFANT; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CHILD; HUMANS; INFANT; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING RECORDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 0030337508     PISSN: 15276546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1996.tb00377.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). (1991). Report to congress: The feasibility of linking research-related data bases to federal and non-federal medical administrative data bases (AHCPR Pub. No. 91-0003). Rockville, MD: Author.
2. Aiken, L. (1988). Assuring the delivery of quality patient care. Nursing resources and the delivery of patient care. (NIH Publication No. 893008, pp. 3-10). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
3. Aydelotte, M. (1962). The use of patient welfare as a criterion measure. Nursing Research, 11, 10-14.
4. Bond, S., & Thomas, L.H. (1991). Issues in measuring outcomes on nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16, 1492-1502.
5. Cohen, M.Z., Kruckeberg, T., McCloskey, J., Bulechek, G., Craft, M.J., Crossley, J., Denehy, J., Glick, O., Maas, M., Prophet, C., Tripp-Reimer, T., Carlson, D., Wyman, M., & Titler, M. (1991). Inductive methodology and a research team. Nursing Outlook, 39(4), 162-165.
6. Daubert, E. (1979). Patient classification system and outcome criteria. Nursing Outlook, 27, 450-454.
7. Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44(3 Part Two), 166-206.
8. Douglas, D., & Robb, A. (1995). Clarifying outcomes in clinical practice. Nursing Standard, 9(24), 29-30.
9. Duggar, B., DeLozier, J., Goldenberg, D., Palmer, R.H., Lawthers, A.G., Banks, N.J., Kurland, D., Hargraves, J.L., & Peterson, L. (1995). Understanding and choosing clinical performance measures for quality improvement: Development of a typology (Contract No. 282-92-0038). Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy Research.
10. Erben, R., Franzkowiak, P., & Wenzel, E. (1992). Assessment of the outcomes of health intervention. Social Science Medicine, 35(4), 359-365.
11. Fehring, R.J. (1987). Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart & Lung, 16(6), 625-629.
12. Gibbs, J. (1972). Sociological theory construction, 312. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
13. Heater, B.S., Becker, A.M., & Olson, R.K. (1988). Nursing interventions and patient outcomes: A meta-analysis of studies. Nursing Research, 37, 303-307.
14. Hegyvary, S.T. (1991). Issues in outcomes research. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance, 5(2), 1-6.
15. Horn, B.J., & Swain, M.A. (1978). Criterion measures of nursing care (DHEW Pub. No. PHS78-3187). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Services Research.
16. Hover, J., & Zimmer, M. (1978). Nursing quality assurance: The Wisconsin System. Nursing Outlook, 26, 242-248.
17. Institute of Medicine. (1991). The computer-based patient record: An essential technology for health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. McCloskey, J.C., & Bulechek, G.M. (Eds.). (1992). Iowa Interventions Project. Nursing interventions classification (NIC). St. Louis: Mosby Year Book.
19. Jennings, B.M. (1991). Patient outcomes research: Seizing the opportunity. Advances in Nursing Science, 14(2), 59-72.
20. Johnson, M., & McCloskey, J.C. (1992). Quality in the nineties. In M. Johnson (Ed.), Series on nursing administration, Vol. 3, The delivery of quality health care (59-68). St. Louis: Mosby.
21. Kritek, P.B. (1989). An introduction to the science and art of taxonomy. Classification systems for describing nursing practice (working papers, 6-12). Kansas City, KS: American Nurses' Association.
22. Lang, N.M., & Clinton, J.F. (1984). Assessment of quality of nursing care. In H.H. Werley & J.J. Fitzpatrick (Eds.). Annual Review of Nursing Research, 2, 135-163, New York: Springer Publishing Co.
23. Madden, D.L. (1990). Health groups, payers develop own "outcomes" program. The Internist, 31(1), 8.
24. Majesky, S.J., Brester, M.H., & Nishio, K.T. (1978). Development of a research tool. Nursing Research, 27, 365-371.
25. Mallison, M.B. (1990). Editorial: Access to invisible expressways. American Journal of Nursing, 90(9), 7.
26. Marek, K.D. (1989). Outcome measurement in nursing. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance, 4(1), 1-9.
27. Martin, K.S., & Scheet, N.J. (1992). The Omaha System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
28. McCormick, K.A. (1991). Future data needs for quality of care monitoring, DRG considerations, reimbursement, and outcome measurement. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(1), 29-32.
29. McDaniel, C., & Nash, J. (1990). Compendium of instruments measuring patient satisfaction with nursing care. Quality Review Bulletin, 16, 182-188.
30. Nadzam, D.M. (1991). The agenda for change: Update on indicator development and possible implications for the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance, 5, (2), 18-22.
31. National Center for Nursing Research (NCNR), (1991). Patient outcomes research: Examining the effectiveness of nursing practice. A state of the science conference. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health.
32. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA). (1994). NANDA nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification 1994-1995. Philadelphia: Author.
33. Rinke, L. (1988). Outcome measures in homecare (Vol. 3). New York: National League for Nursing.
34. Saba, V.K. (1992). The classification of home health care nursing diagnoses and interventions. Caring, 11(3), 50-57.
35. Salive, M.E., Mayfield, J.A., & Weissman, N.W. (1990). Patient outcomes research teams and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Health Services Research, 25, 697-708.
36. Stewart, B.J., & Archbold, P.G. (1992). Nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: Part one. Research in Nursing and Health, 15, 477-481.
37. Stewart, B.J., & Archbold, P.G. (1993). Nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: Part two. Research in Nursing and Health, 16, 77-81.
38. Suppe, F., & Jacox, A.R. (1985). Philosophy of science and the development of nursing theory. In H. Werey & J. Fitzpatrick, (Eds.), Annual review of nursing research (Vol. 3, 241-267). New York: Springer.
39. Tarlov, A.R., Ware, J.E., Greenfield, S., Nelson, E.C., Perrin, E., & Zubkoff, M. (1989). The medical outcomes study: An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 262, 925-930.
40. US General Accounting Office. (1991). Medical ADP systems: Automated medical records hold promise to improve patient care. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office.
41. Walizer, M.H., & Wienir, P.L. (1978). Research methods and analysis: Searching for relationships (37). New York: Harper & Row.
42. Waltz, C.G., Strickland, O.L., & Lenz, E.R. (1991). Measurement in nursing research. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
43. Werley, H.H., & Lang, N.M. (Eds.). (1988). Identification of the nursing minimum data set. New York: Springer.
44. Zielstorff, R.D. (1995). Capturing and using clinical outcome data: Implications for information systems design. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2(3), 191-196.