A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? Report of the second year of the study

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-27

  Boyle, Bill ^a   Lamprianou, Iasonas ^a   Boyle, Trudy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32144463202     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09243450500114819     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arbaugh, F. (2003). Study groups as a form of professional development for secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 139-163.
2. Boyle, B., While, D., & Boyle, T. (2003). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
3. Caldwell, B. J. (2003). Mission impossible? A strategic view of efforts to lead the transformation of schools. Paper presented at 6th World Convention of the International Confederation of Principals, Edinburgh, UK.
4. Corcoran, T.B. (1995a). Transforming conceptions of professional learning. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp.185-201). New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Corcoran, T.B. (1995b). Transforming professional development for teachers: A guide for state policymakers. Washington, DC: National Governors' Association.
6. Corcoran, T. B., Shields, P. M., & Zucker, A. A. (1998). Evaluation of NSFs Statewide Systemic Initiatives (SSI) program: The SSIs and professional development for teachers. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
7. Cuban, L. (1990). How teachers taught. New York: Longman.
8. Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Changing conceptions of teaching and teacher development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 22(4), 9-26.
9. Fletcher, C. L., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2002). Evaluating professional development with student data: Challenges and successes for project ESTT. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
10. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimore, L., Birman, B., & Suk Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (4), 915-945.
11. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. G. (1992). Understanding teacher development. London: Cassell.
12. Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 3-19.
13. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. (2001). Schools Achieving Success. London: DfES.
14. Hustler, D., McNamara, O., Jarvis, J., Londra, M., Campbell, A., & Howson, J. (2003). Teachers. Perceptions of continuing professional development. DfES Research Brief 429, London.
15. Jeff, S., & Julie, N. (1991). Accuracy of self-reported course work and grade information of high school sophomores. American College Testing Research Report Series, REPORT_NO: ACT-RR-91-6.
16. Lambert, R. G. (2003). Considering purpose and intended use when making evaluations of assessments: A response to Dickinson. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 23-26.
17. Levin, B. B., & Rock, T. C. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 135-149.
18. Lieberman, A. (1996). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 185-201). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
20. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
21. Maxey, E. J., & Ormsby, V. J. (1971). The accuracy of self-report information collected on the ACT Test Battery: High school grades and items of nonacademic achievement. Research and Development Division, The American College Testing Program, REPORT_NO: ACT-RR-45.
22. Nasser, F. M., & Fresko, B. (2003). The contribution of completing degree studies to teachers' professional development in Israel. Educational Studies, 29(2/3), 179-193.
23. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1989). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession. Washington, DC: Author.
24. National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. (1996). Teachers take charge of their learning: Transforming professional development for student success. West Haven, CT: Author.
25. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2001). What schools for the future? Paris: Author.
26. Office for Standards in Education [Ofsted]. (2002a). Continuing professional development for teachers in schools. London: Author.
27. Ofsted. (2002b). Good teaching, effective departments. London: Author.
28. Porter, A. C. (2001). The condition of education. National Center for Education Statistics, reached at http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/quarterly/summer/ q1-2.asp.
29. Resnicow, K., Davis, M., Smith, M., Lazarus-Yaroch, A., Baranowski, T., Baranowski, J., Doyle, C., & Wang, D. T. (1998). How best to measure implementation of school health curricula: A comparison of three measures. Health Education Research: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 239-250.
30. Richardson, V. (Ed.). (1994). Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
31. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 905-947). New York: Macmillan.
32. Shields, P. M., Marsh, J.A., & Adelman, N. E. (1998). Evaluation of NSF.s Statewide Systemic Initiatives Program: The SSIs impact on classroom practice. Menlo Park, CA: SRI.
33. Shulman, L., & Sparks, D. (1992). Merging content knowledge and pedagogy: An interview with Lee Shulman. Journal of staff development, 13(1), 14-16.
34. Shymansky, J.A., Yore, L. D., Anderson, J.O., & Hand, B. M. (2001). Teacher beliefs about, perceived implementation of, and demonstration classroom use of science reform principles. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St Louis, MO.
35. th), Minneapolis, MN.
36. Stiles, K., Loucks-Horsley, S., & Hewson, P. (1996). Principles of professional development for mathematics and science education: A synthesis of standards. In NISE Brief (Vol. 1). Madison, WI: National Institutes for Science Education.
37. Taylor, P. J., Lamers, A., Vincent, M. P., & O'Driscoll, M. P. (1998). The validity of immediate and delayed self-reports in training evaluation: An exploratory field study. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47(4), 459-479.
38. Traub, R. E., & Weiss, J. (1982, March). The accuracy of teachers' self-reports: Evidence from an observational study of open education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
39. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Teacher quality. A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers (NCES 1999-080). Washington, DC: Author.
40. Weiss, I. R., Montgomery, D. L., Ridgeway, C.J., & Bond, S. L. (1998). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement: Year three cross-site report. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.