A Schur-Newton-Krylov solver for steady-state aeroelastic analysis and design sensitivity analysis

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 195, Issue 17-18, 2006, Pages 2050-2069

  Barcelos, Manuel ^a   Bavestrello, Henri ^b   Maute, Kurt ^a  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Aeroelasticity; Design optimization; Sensitivity analysis; Three field formulation

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

AEROELASTIC SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; NEWTON-KRYLOV APPROACH; THREE FIELD FORMULATION;

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 32044474812     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. N. Alexandrov M.Y. Hussaini Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art 1997 SIAM Philadelphia
2. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski R.T. Haftka Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: Survey of recent developments Struct. Optim. 14 1997 1-23
3. C. Farhat P. Geuzaine G. Brown Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid-structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter Comput. Fluids 32 2003 3-29
4. J. Reuther, J. Alonso, J. Martins, S. Smith, A coupled aero-structural optimization method for complete aircraft configuration, AIAA 99-0187, 1999.
5. G.-W. Hou, A. Sathyanarayana, Analytical sensitivity analysis of a statical aeroelastic wing, in: AIAA 2000-4824, 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, September 6-8, 2000/Long Beach, CA, 2000.
6. K. Maute M. Nikbay C. Farhat Coupled analytical sensitivity analysis and optimization of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems AIAA J. 39 11 2001 2051-2061
7. E. Lund H. Møller L. Jakobsen Shape optimization of fluid-structure interaction problems with large displacements and two-equation turbulence models H.A. Mang F.G. Rammerstorfer J. Eberhardsteiner Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM V), July 7-12, 2002, Vienna, Austria 2002 Vienna University of Technology Austria 3-9501554-0-6 Available from:
8. E. Lund H. Moller L. Jakobsen Shape design optimization of stationary fluid-structure interaction problems with large displacements and turbulence Multidisciplin. Struct. Optim. 25 5-6 2003 383-392
9. K. Maute M. Nikbay C. Farhat Sensitivity analysis and design optimization of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems by the adjoint method Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 56 6 2003 911-933
10. K. Maute M. Allen Conceptual design of aeroelastic structures by topology optimization Multidisciplin. Struct. Optim. 27 2004 27-42
11. J. Martins, J. Alonso, High-fidelity aero-structural design optimization of a supersonic business jet, in: AIAA 2002-1483, 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, April 22-25, 2002, Denver, CO, 2002.
12. O. Ghattas X. Li Domain decomposition methods for sensitivity analysis of a nonlinear aeroelasticity problem Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dynam. 11 1998 112-130
13. Y. Saad M.H. Schultz GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 7 1986 856-869
14. M. Heil An efficient solver for the fully coupled solution of large-displacement fluid-structure interaction problems Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 193 2004 1-23
15. J.Y. Kim N.R. Aluru D.A. Tortorelli Improved multi-level Newton solvers for fully coupled multi-physics problems J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 58 2003 463-480
16. J. Gerbeau M. Vidrascu A quasi-Newton algorithm based on a reduced model for fluid-structure interaction problems in blood flows Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 37 4 2003 631-647
17. W. Egartner V. Schulz Partially reduced SQP methods for optimal turbine and compressor blade design Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications, ENUMATH 97 1998 World Scientific Publishing Singapore
18. C. Orozco O. Ghattas A reduced SAND method for optimal design of non-linear structures Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 40 1997 2759-2774
19. C. Gumbert, G.-W. Hou, P. Newman, Simultaneous aerodynamic analysis and design optimization (SAADO) for a 3D flexible wing, in: AIAA 2001-1107, 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 8-11, 2001, Reno, NV, 2001.
20. C. Farhat M. Lesoinne N. Maman Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: Three-field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 21 10 1995 807-835
21. C. Farhat M. Lesoinne P. LeTallec Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid-structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 157 1998 95-114
22. J.T. Batina Unsteady Euler algorithm with unstructured dynamic mesh for complex-aircraft aerodynamic analysis AIAA J. 29 3 1991 327-333
23. C. Degand C. Farhat A three-dimensional torsional spring analogy method for unstructured dynamic meshes Comput. Struct. 80 2002 305-316
24. J.M. Ortega W.C. Rheinboldt Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables 1970 Academic Press London
25. M.N. Vrahatis G.D. Magoulas V.P. Plagianakos From linear to nonlinear iterative methods Appl. Numer. Math. 45 2003 59-77
26. C.T. Kelley D.E. Keyes Convergence analysis of pseudo-transient continuation SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 2 1998 508-523
27. D.P. Mok, W.A. Wall, E. Ramm, Accelerated iterative substructure schemes for instationary fluid-structure interaction, in: First MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, 2001, pp. 1325-1328.
28. P. LeTallec J. Mouro Fluid structure interaction with large structural displacements Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190 2001 3039-3067
29. W. Wall, D. Mok, E. Ramm, Partitioned analysis approach of the transient coupled response of viscous fluids and flexible structures, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computational Mechanics, ECCM 99, September 1999, Munich, Germany, 1999.
30. L.B. Wigton, N.J. Yu, D.P. Young, GMRES acceleration of computational fluid dynamics codes, AIAA Technical Report, 1985, pp. 85-1494.
31. C. Michler, E. van Brummelen, R. de Borst, Subiteration-preconditioned GMRES for fluid-structure interaction, in: Proceedings of the 7th US National Congress on Computational Mechanics, July 27-31, 2003, Albuquerque, NM, 2003.
32. R. Dembo S. Eisenstat T. Steihaug Inexact Newton methods SIAM J. Number. Anal. 19 1982 400-408
33. S.C. Eisenstat H.F. Walker Choosing the forcing terms in an inexact Newton method SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 17 1996 16-32
34. C. Farhat M. Lesoinne Two efficient staggered algorithms for the serial and parallel solution of three-dimensional nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 182 2000 499-515
35. X.-C. Cai, C. Farhat, M. Sarkis, A minimum overlap restricted additive Schwarz preconditioner and applications in 3D flow simulations, in: X.-C.C.J. Mandel, C. Farhat (Eds.), The Tenth International Conference on Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 218, 1998.
36. G. Kreisselmeier R. Steinhauser Application of vector performance optimization to a robust control loop design for a fighter aircraft Int. J. Control 37 1983 251-284
37. M. Barcelos, H. Bavestrello, K. Maute, Efficient solution strategies for steady-state aeroelastic analysis and design sensitivity analysis, in: 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Optimization Conference, August 30-September 1, 2004, Albany, NY, 2004.
38. M. Sandford, D. Seidel, C. Eckstrom, C. Spain, Geometrical and structural properties of an aeroelastic research wing (ARW-2), NASA-TM-4110, 1989.
39. K.-U. Bletzinger S. Kimmich E. Ramm Efficient modeling in shape optimal design Comput. Syst. Engrg. 2 1991 483-495
40. K. Maute S. Schwarz E. Ramm Structural optimization - the interaction between form and mechanics J. Appl. Math. Mech. ZAMM 79 1999 651-673