Simultaneous aerodynamic analysis and design optimization (SAADO) for a 3-D flexible wing

39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages

  Gumbert, Clyde R ^a   Hou, Gene J W ^b   Newman, Perry A ^a  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Old Dominion University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; COMPUTATIONAL EXPENSE; CONVENTIONAL OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; ITS APPLICATIONS; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION METHOD;

AERODYNAMICS; AEROSPACE ENGINEERING; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84897585617     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Newman, P. A., Hou, G. J.-W., and Taylor III A. C., Observations Regarding Use of Advanced CFD Analysis, Sensitivity Analysis, and Design Codes in MDO, in Ref. 3, pp. 263-279; also ICASE Report 96-16, NASA CR 198293, (available electronically at www.icase.edu).
2. Newman, III J. C., Taylor, III, A. C. Barnwell, R. W. Newman, P. A., and Hou, G. J.-W., Overview of Sensitivity Analysis and Shape Optimization for Complex Aerodynamic Configurations, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1999, pp. 87-96.
3. Alexandrov, N. M., and Hussaini, M. Y., Eds., Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art, SI AM Proceedings Series, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1997.
4. Ghattas, O. and Orozco, C. E., A Parallel Reduced Hessian SQP Method for Shape Optimization, in Ref. 3, pp. 133-152.
5. Hou, G. J.-W., Taylor, III A. C., Mani, S. V., and Newman P. A., Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization, Abstracts from 2nd U.S. National Congress on Computational Mechanics, Washington, DC, Aug., 1993, pp. 130.
6. Mani, S. V., Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization, M. S. Thesis, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, Dec. 1993.
7. Hou, G. J.-W., Korivi, V. M., Taylor, III, A. C. Maroju V., and Newman P. A., Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization (SAADO) of a Turbulent Transonic Airfoil Using a Navier-Stokes Code With Automatic Differentiation (ADIFOR), Computational Aerosciences Workshop 95, edited by W. J. Feiereisen, and A. K. Lacer, NASA CD CP-20010, Jan. 1996, pp. 82-85.
8. Gumbert, C. R., Hou, G.J.-W., and Newman, P. A., Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization (SAADO) of a 3-D Rigid Wing, Proceedings, J4' AlAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, June 1999, pp. 402-418;also AIAA Paper 99-3296.
9. Haftka, R. T., Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., and Padula, S. L., On Options for Interdisciplinary Analysis and Design Optimization, Structural Optimization, Vol. 4, 1992, pp. 65-74.
10. Shubin, G. R., Application of Alternative Multidisciplinary Optimization Formulations to a Model Problem for Static Aeroelasticity. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 118, No. 1, 1995, pp. 73-85.
11. Arian, E., Analysis of the Hessian for Aeroelastic Optimization, ICASE Report No. 95-84, NASA CR 198245, Dec. 1995.
12. Walsh, J. L., Townsend, J. C, Salas, A. O., Samareh, J. A., Mukhopadhyay, V., and Barthelemy, J.-F., Multidisciplinary High-Fidelity Analysis and Optimization of Aerospace Vehicles, Part 1: Formulation, AIAA Paper 2000-0418, Jan. 2000.
13. Walsh, J. L., Weston, R. P., Samareh, J. A., Mason, B. H., Green, L. L., and Biedron, R. T., Multidisciplinary High-Fidelity Analysis and Optimization of Aerospace Vehicles, Part 2: Preliminary Results, AIAA Paper 2000-0419, Jan. 2000.
14. Reuther, J. J., Alonso, J. J., Martins, J. R., and Smith, S. C., A Coupled Aero-Structural Optimization Method for Complete Aircraft Configurations, AIAA Paper 99-0187, Jan. 1999.
15. Kapania, R. K., Eldred, L. B., and Barthelemy, J., Sensitivity Analysis of a Wing Aeroelastic Response, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1993, pp. 496-504; also AIAA Paper 91-1103, Apr. 1991.
16. th AIAA/USAF/NASA/fSSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City Beach, FL, Sept. 1994, pp. 1286-1300; also AIAA Paper 94-4400 CP.
17. Giunta, A. A., and Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., Progress Toward Using Sensitivity Derivatives in a High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Analysis of a Supersonic Transport, 7' AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO, Sept. 1998, pp. 441-453; also AIAA Paper 98-4763 CP
18. Giunta, A. A., Sensitivity Analysis for Coupled Aero-Structural Systems, NASA/TM-1999-209367, Aug. 1999.
19. Newman, III J. C. Whitfield, D. L., and Anderson K. W., A Step-Size Independent Approach for Multidisciplinary Sensitivity Analysis and Design Optimization, J7 Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Norfolk, VA, June-July 1999, pp. 12-22; also AIAA Paper 99-3101.
20. Ghattas, O., and Li, X., Domain Decomposition Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of a Nonlinear Aeroelastic Problem, International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 11, 1998, pp. 113-130.
21. Moller, H. and Lund, E., Shape Sensitivity Analysis of Strongly Coupled Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems, AIAA Paper AIAA-2000-4823.
22. Maute, K., Nikbay, M. and Farhat, C., Analytical Based Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Nonlinear Aeroelastic Systems AIAA Paper AIAA-2000-4825.
23. Hou, G. and Satyanarayana, A., Analytical Sensitivity Analysis of a Static Aeroelastic Wing, AIAA Paper AIAA-2000-4824.
24. Biros, G. and Ghattas, O., Parallel Newton-Krylov Algorithms For PDE-Constrained Optimization Proceedings of Scientific Computing 99, Portland, OR, 1999.
25. Ghattas, O., and Bark, J.-H., Optimal Control of Two- and Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Flows, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.136, No. 2, 1997, pp. 231-244.
26. Rumsey, C., Biedron, R., and Thomas, J., CFL3D: Its History and Some Recent Applications, NASA TM-112861, May 1997.
27. Sherman, L., Taylor, III A., Green, L., Newman, P., Hou, G., and Korivi, M., First- and Second-Order Aerodynamic Sensitivity Derivatives via Automatic Differentiation with Incremental Iterative Methods, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.129, No. 2, 1996, pp. 307-336.
28. Bischof, C. H., Carle, A., Corliss, G. F., Griewank, A., and Hovland, P., ADIFOR: Generating Derivative Codes from Fortran Programs, Scientific Programming, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1992, pp. 1-29.
29. Bischof, C., and Griewank, A., ADIFOR: A Fortran System for Portable Automatic Differentiation, Proceedings, Fourth AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Cleveland, Sept. 1992, pp. 433-441; also AIAA Paper 92-4744 CP.
30. Taylor, III A. C, Oloso A., and Newman III J.C., CFL3D.ADII (Version 2.0): An Efficient, Accurate, General-Purpose Code for Flow Shape-Sensitivity Analysis, AIAA Paper 97-2204, June 1997.
31. Smith, R. E., Bloor, M. I. G., Wilson, M. J., and Thomas, A. T., Rapid Airplane Parametric Input Design (RAPID), Proceedings, 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, June 1995, pp. 452-462; also AIAA Paper 95-1687.
32. Jones, W. T., and Samareh-Abolhassani, J., A Grid Generation System for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, Proceedings, 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, June 1995, pp. 474-482; also AIAA Paper 95-1689.
33. Bischof, C., Jones, W. T., Samareh-Abolhassani, J., and Mauer, A., Experiences with the Application of the ADIC Automatic Differentiation Tool to the CSCMDO 3-D Volume Grid Generation Code, AIAA Paper 96-0716, Jan. 1996.
34. Vatsa, V. N., and Wedan, B. W., Effect of Sidewall Boundary Layer on a Wing in a Wind Tunnel, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1989, pp. 157-161; also AIAA Paper 88-1020, Jan. 1988.
35. Nguyen, D. T., Finite Element Software for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, Final Report, Old Dominion University Research Foundation, Contract NAS1 -19858, Task 69, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, Nov. 1995.
36. Hou, G., Arunkumar, S., and Tiwari, N. S., First- and Second-Order Sensitivity Analysis of Finite Element Equations via Automatic Differentiation, 7il!AIAA/USAF/NASA/1SSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO, Sept. 1998, pp. 454_464; also AIAA Paper 98-4764.
37. th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, Sept. 6-8, 2000.
38. Anon., DOT Users Manual: Version 4.20, Vanderplaats Research & Development, Inc., Colorado Springs, May 1995.
39. Ta'asan, S., Trends in Aerodynamic Design and Optimization: A Mathematical Viewpoint, Proceedings, 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, June 1995, pp. 961-970; also, AIAA Paper 95-1