A coupled aero-structural optimization method for complete aircraft configurations

37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages

  Reuther, James J ^a,c   Alonso, Juan J ^b   Martins, Joaquim R R A ^b   Smith, Stephen C ^c  

^a MCAT Institute   (United States)

^b 496 Lomita Mall   (United States)

^c NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; AIRCRAFT; HEAT TRANSFER; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS;

AERO-STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATIONS; HIGH FIDELITY MODELS; INFORMATION EXCHANGES; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATIONS; PARALLEL IMPLEMENTATIONS; REYNOLDS - AVERAGED NAVIER-STOKES; STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS;

STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84982318332     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1999-187     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski and R. T. Haftka. Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimiza-tion: Survey ofrecent developments. AIAA paper 96-0711, 34th Aeospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1996.
2. S. Wakayama. Lifting surface design using mul-tidisciplinary optimization. Ph. D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA1 December 1994.
3. S. R. Wakayama and I. M. Kroo. A method for lifting surface design using nonlinear optimization. Dayton, OH, Sept. 1990. AIAA Paper 903120. AIAA/AHS/ASEE Aircraft Design Systems and Operations Conference.
4. J. W. Gallman. Structural and Aerodynamic Optimization of Joined- Wing Aircraft. Ph.d. dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA1 June 1992.
5. J. J. Reuther, A. Jameson, J. J. Alonsol M. Rimlinger, and D. Saunders. Constrained multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using an adjoint formulation and parallel computers: PartI. Journal of Aircraft, 1998. Accepted for publication.
6. J. J. Reuther, A. Jameson, J. J. Alonso, M. Rimlinger, and D. Saunders. Constrained multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using an adjoint formulation and parallel computers: Part II. Journal ofAircraft, 1998. Accepted for publication.
7. J. Reuther, Á. Jameson, J. Farmer, L. Mar-_ tineUi, and D. Saunders. Aerodynamic shape optimization of complex aircraft configurations via an adjoint formulation. AIAA paper 960094, 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1996.
8. J. Reuther, A. Jameson, J. J. Alonso, M. J. Rimlinger, and D. Saunders. Constrained multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using an adjoint formulation and parallel computers. AIAA paper 97-0103, 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno1 Nevada, January 1997.
9. J. Reuther, J. J. Alonso, J. C. Vassberg, A. Jameson, and L. Martinelli. An efficient multiblock method for aerodynamic analysis and design on distributed memory systems. AIAA paper 97-1893, June 1997.
10. A Jameson, N Pierce and L Martinelli. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA paper 97-0101, 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1997.
11. A. Jameson. Re-engineering the design process through computation. AIAA paper 97-0641, 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1997.
12. J. Reuther and A. Jameson. Aerodynamic shape optimization of wing and wing-body configurations using control theory. AIAA paper 95-0123, 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1995.
13. A. Jameson. Automatic design oftransonic airfoils to reduce the shock induced pressure drag. In Proceedings of the 31st Israel Annual Conference on Aviation and Aeronautics, Tel Aviv, pages 5-17, February 1990.
14. A. Jameson. Aerodynamic design via control theory. Journal ofScientific Computing, 3:233-260, 1988.
15. I. M. Kroo. Decomposition and collaborative optimization for large scale aerospace design. In N. Alexandrov and M. Y. Hussaini, editors, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art. SIAM, 1996.
16. R. Braun, P. Gage, I. Kroo, and I. Sobieski. Implementation and performance issues in collaborative optimization. AIAA paper 96-4017, 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, September 1996.
17. A. Jameson and J J. Alonso. Automatic aerodynamic optimization on distributed memory architectures. AIAA paper 96-0409, 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1996.
18. A… A. Giunta, V. Balabanov, D. Haim, B. Grossman, W. H. Mason, and L T Watson. Wing design for a high-speed civil transport using a design ofexperiments methodology. AIAA paper 96-4001, 6th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, September 1996.
19. R. S. Sellar and S. M. Batill. Concurrent subspace optimization using gradient-enhanced neural network approximations. AIAA paper 96-4019, 6th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, September 1996.
20. S. A. Brown. Displacement extrapolation for CFD+CSM aeroelastic analysis. AIAA paper 97-1090, 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1997.
21. M Holden. Optimizationofdyiiamicsystems using collocation methods. Ph. D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, February 1999.
22. R. Jiaimes. CAPRI: Computational Analysis PRogramming Interface. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March 1998.
23. R. M. Hicks and P. A. Henne. Wing design by numerical optimization. Journal of Aircraft, 15:407-412, 1978.
24. R. Kennelly. Improved method for transonic airfoil design-by-optimization. AIAA paper 831-864, AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Danvers, Massachusetts, July 1983.
25. G- W. Burgreen and O. Baysal. Three-dimensional aerodynamic shape optimization of wings using sensitivity analysis. AIAA paper 94-0094, 32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1994.
26. H. M. Adelman and Raphael T. Haftka. Sensitivity analysis of discrete structural systems. AIAA Journal, 24:823-832, 1986.
27. J. Gallman, J. J. Alonso, J. Reuther, and M. Lessoine. Multi-disciplinary optimization using computational fluid dynamics (cfd). Topic Area Number 29: BAA 98-04-PRK, Research Proposal Submitted to the Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Airforce Base, Dayton, Ohio, 1998.
28. M. Baker and J. Giesing. A practical approach to mdo and its application to an hsct aircraft. AIAA paper 95-3885, Ist AIAA Aircraft Engineering, Technology, and Operations Congress, Los Angeles, CA, September 1995.