Cingulate cortical coding of context-dependent latent inhibition

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 119, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1524-1532

  Talk, Andrew ^a,b   Stoll, Elizabeth ^a   Gabriel, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Basolateral amygdala; Cingulate cortex; CS preexposure effect; Medial geniculate nucleus; Substantia nigra

Indexed keywords

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIPPOCAMPUS; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LATENT INHIBITION; MALE; MEDIAL GENICULATE BODY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; RABBIT; REINFORCEMENT; SHOCK; SUBSTANTIA NIGRA;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRAIN MAPPING; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; GYRUS CINGULI; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NEURONS; RABBITS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 31344454241     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.6.1524     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ackil, J. E., Mellgren, R. L., Halgren, C., & Frommer, G. P. (1969). Effects of CS preexposures on avoidance learning in rats with hippocampal lesions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 69, 739-747.
2. Baker, A. G., & Mercier, P. (1982). Extinction of the context and latent inhibition. Learning and Motivation, 13, 391-416.
3. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. [Review]. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
4. Brogden, W., & Culler, E. (1936). Device for the motor conditioning of small animals. Science, 83, 269-270.
5. Buchwald, J., Holstein, S. B., & Weber, D. S. (1973). Multiple unit recording: Technique, interpretation, and experimental applications. In R. F. Thompson & M. M. Patterson (Eds.), Bioelectric recording techniques. Part A: Cellular processes and brain potentials (pp. 202-242). New York: Academic Press.
6. Escobar, M., Arcediano, F., & Miller, R. R. (2002). Latent inhibition and contextual associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 123-136.
7. Fox, C. A., & Eichman, J. (1959). A rapid method for locating intracerebral electrode tracks. Stain Technology, 34, 39-42.
8. Gabriel, M. (1970). Intersession exposure to conditioning apparatus, avoidance extinction, and intertrial behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 72, 244-249.
9. Gabriel, M. (1993). Discriminative avoidance learning: A model system. In M. Gabriel & B. A. Vogt (Eds.), Neurobiology of cingulate cortex and limbic thalamus (pp. 478-523). Boston: Birkhäuser.
10. Gabriel, M., Burhans, L., Talk, A., & Scalf, P. (2002). The cingulate cortex. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.). Encyclopedia of the human brain (Vol. 1, pp. 775-791). New York: Academic Press.
11. Gabriel, M., Kubota, Y., Sparenborg, S., Straube, K., & Vogt, B. A. (1991). Effects of cingulate cortical lesions on avoidance learning and training-induced unit activity in rabbits. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 585-600.
12. Gabriel, M., Sparenborg, S., & Kubota, Y. (1989). Anterior and medial thalamic lesions, discriminative avoidance learning, and cingulate cortical neuronal activity in rabbits. Experimental Brain Research, 76, 441-457.
13. Gabriel, M., & Talk, A. C. (2001). A tale of two paradigms: Lessons learned from parallel studies of discriminative instrumental learning and classical eyeblink conditioning. In J. E. Steinmetz, M. A. Gluck, & P. R. Solomon (Eds.), Model systems and the neurobiology of associative learning: A festschrift in honor of professor Richard F. Thompson, (pp. 149-185). New York: Erlbaum.
14. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1997). Psychobiological models of hippocampal function in learning and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 481-514.
15. Grahame, N. J., Barnet, R. C., Günther, L. M., & Miller, R. R. (1994). Latent inhibition as a performance deficit resulting from CS-context associations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 395-408.
16. Holt, W., & Maren, S. (1999). Muscimol inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus impairs contextual retrieval of fear memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 9054-9062.
17. Honey, R. C., & Good, M. (1993). Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23-33.
18. Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69-82.
19. Kaye, H., & Pearce, J. M. (1987). Hippocampal lesions attenuate latent inhibition and the decline of orienting response in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 39(B), 107-125.
20. Kraemer, P. J., Randall, C. K., & Carbary, T. J. (1991). Release from latent inhibition with delayed testing. Animal Learning & Behavior, 19, 139-145.
21. Lovibond, P. F., Preston, G. C., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1984). Context specificity of conditioning, extinction, and latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 360-375.
22. Lubow, R. E., & Gewirtz, J. C. (1995). Latent inhibition in humans: Data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 87-103.
23. Lubow, R. E., & Moore, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditioned stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 415-419.
24. Lubow, R. E., Schnur, P., & Rifkin, B. (1976). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Beltavior Processes, 2, 163-174.
25. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
26. Miller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. Li G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 51-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Otto, T., Cousens, G., & Rajewski, K. (1997). Odor-guided fear conditioning in rats: I. Acquisition, retention, and latent inhibition. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 1257-1264.
28. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 82, 532-552.
29. Schmajuk, N. A. (2002). Latent inhibition and its neural basis. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
30. Schmajuk, N. A., Lam, Y. W., & Gray, J. A. (1996). Latent inhibition: A neural network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 321-349.
31. Smith, D. M., Monteverde, J., Schwartz, E., Freeman J. H., Jr., & Gabriel, M. (2001). Lesions in the central nucleus of the amygdala: Discriminative avoidance learning, discriminative approach learning, and cingulothalamic training-induced neuronal activity. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 76, 403-425.
32. Smith, D. M., Wakeman, D., Patel, J., & Gabriel, M. (2004). Fornix lesions impair context-related cingulothalamic neuronal patterns and concurrent discrimination learning in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Behavioral Neuroscience, 118, 1225-1239.
33. Solomon, P. R., Crider, A., Winkelman, J. W., Turi, A., Kamer, R. M., & Kaplan, L. J. (1981). Disrupted latent inhibition in the rat with chronic amphetamine or haloperidol-induced supersensitivity: Relationship to schizophrenic attention disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 16, 519-537.
34. Solomon, P. R., & Moore, J. W. (1975). Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89, 1192-1203.
35. Weiner, I. (1990). Neural substrates of latent inhibition: The switching model. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 442-461.
36. Weiner, I., & Feldon J. (1997). The switching model of latent inhibition: An update of neural substrates. Behavioural Brain Research, 88, 11-25.
37. Weiner, I., Feldon, J., & Katz, Y. (1987). Facilitation of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by haloperidol in rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 2, 241-246.
38. Weiner, I., Lubow, R. E., & Feldon, J. (1984). Abolition of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by chronic amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 83, 194-199.
39. Westbrook, R. F., Jones, M. L., Bailey, G. K., & Harris, J. A. (2000). Contextual control over conditioned responding in a latent inhibition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 157-173.
40. Winer, B. J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Yee, B. K., Feldon, J., & Rawlins, J. N. (1995). Latent inhibition in rats is abolished by NMDA-induced neuronal loss in the retrohippocampal region, but this lesion effect can be prevented by systemic haloperidol treatment. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 227-240.