Monocular Transparency and unpaired stereopsis (DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.006);Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1695-1705

  Grove, Philip M ^a   Brooks, Kevin R ^a   Anderson, Barton L ^a   Gillam, Barbara J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Contrast polarity; Monocular gap stereopsis; Monocular occlusion; Stereopsis; Transparency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 31344433518     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.05.003     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. B.L. Anderson The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis Nature 367 1994 365 368
2. B.L. Anderson Stereoscopic surface perception Neuron 24 1999 919 928
3. B.L. Anderson The role of occlusion in the perception of depth, lightness, and opacity Psychological Review 110 2003 762 784
4. B.L. Anderson, and B. Julesz A theoretical analysis of illusory contour formation in stereopsis Psychological Review 102 1995 705 743
5. B.A. Bacon, and P. Mamassian A modal completion and the perception of depth without binocular correspondence Perception 31 2002 1037 1045
6. D.H. Brainard The psychophysics toolbox Spatial Vision 10 1997 437 442
7. Brooks, K. R., & Gillam, B. J. (2005). Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage. Vision Research.
8. A.I. Cogan, L.L. Kontsevich, A.J. Lomakin, D.L. Halpern, and R. Blake Binocular disparity processing with opposite-contrast stimuli Perception 24 1995 33 47
9. A.I. Cogan, A.J. Lomakin, and A.F. Rossi Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: Effects of spatial density and interocular delay Vision Research 33 1993 1959 1975
10. M. Cook, and B.J. Gillam Depth of monocular elements in a binocular scene: The conditions for da Vinci stereopsis Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 2004 92 103
11. B.G. Cumming, and A.J. Parker Response of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception Nature 389 1997 280 283
12. G.C. DeAngelis, I. Ohzawa, and R.D. Freeman Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure Nature 352 1991 156 159
13. da Vinci, L. (ca. 1508). Manuscript D. (Available in the Bibliotheque de l'institute de France, Paris).
14. J. Forte, J.W. Peirce, and P. Lennie Binocular integration of partially occluded surfaces Vision Research 42 2002 1225 1235
15. B.J. Gillam Matching needed for stereopsis Nature 373 1995 202 203
16. B.J. Gillam, S. Blackburn, and K. Nakayama Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: Metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours Vision Research 39 1999 493 502
17. B.J. Gillam, and E. Borsting The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays Perception 17 1988 603 608
18. B.J. Gillam, M. Cook, and S. Blackburn Monocular discs in the occlusion zones of binocular surfaces do not have quantitative depth-a comparison with Panum's limiting case Perception 32 2003 1009 1019
19. B.J. Gillam, and K. Nakayama Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone Vision Research 39 1999 109 112
20. P.M. Grove, B.J. Gillam, and H. Ono Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms Vision Research 42 2002 1859 1870
21. P.M. Grove, and H. Ono Ecologically invalid monocular texture leads to longer perceptual latencies in random dot stereograms Perception 28 1999 627 640
22. J. Häkkinen, and Nyman Depth asymmetry in da Vinci stereopsis Vision Research 36 1996 3815 3819
23. I.P. Howard, and P.A. Duke Monocular transparency generates quantitative depth Vision Research 43 2003 2615 2621
24. I.P. Howard, and B.J. Rogers Seeing in depth, volume 2: Depth perception 2002 I Porteous Toronto
25. M.M. Levy, and R.B. Lawson Stereopsis and binocular rivalry from dichoptic stereograms Vision Research 18 1978 239 246
26. L Liu, S.B. Stevenson, and C.M. Schor Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence Nature 367 1994 66 68
27. L Liu, S.B. Stevenson, and C.M. Schor Binocular matching of dissimilar features in phantom stereopsis Vision Research 37 1997 633 644
28. J. Malik, B.L. Anderson, and C.E. Charowhas Stereoscopic occlusion junctions Nature Neuroscience 2 1999 840 843
29. R. Maske, S. Yamane, and P.O. Bishop End stopped cells and binocular depth discrimination in the striate cortex of cats Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 299 1986 257 276
30. F Metelli The perception of transparency Scientific American 230 1974 90 98
31. K. Nakayama, and S. Shimojo Da Vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points Vision Research 30 1990 1811 1825
32. M.J. Pianta, and B.J. Gillam Monocular gap stereopsis: Manipulation of the outer edge disparity and the shape of the gap Vision Research 43 2003 1937 1950
33. M.J. Pianta, and B.J. Gillam Paired and unpaired features can be equally effective in human depth perception Vision Research 43 2003 1 6
34. D.R. Pope, M Edwards, and C. Schor Extraction of depth from opposite-contrast stimuli: Transient system can, sustained system can't Vision Research 39 1999 4010 4017
35. S. Shimojo, and K. Nakayama Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry Vision Research 30 1990 69 80
36. D.R. Simmons, and F.A.A. Kingdom Differences between stereopsis with isoluminant and isochromatic stimuli Journal of the Optical Society of America 12 1995 2094 2104
37. M. Singh, and B.L. Anderson Toward a perceptual theory of transparency Psychological Review 109 2002 492 519
38. T. Watanabe, and P. Cavanagh Transparent surfaces defined by implicit × junctions Vision Research 33 1993 2339 2346
39. C. Wheatstone Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part of the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 128 1838 371 394
40. Whittle, P. (1963) Binocular rivalry. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.