Depth asymmetry in da Vinci stereopsis

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 23, 1996, Pages 3815-3819

  Häkkinen, Jukka ^a   Nyman, Göte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Binocular monocular interaction; Da Vinci stereopsis; Depth perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0030560675     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00099-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson B.L., Nakayama K. Toward a general theory of stereopsis: Binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion. Psychological Review. 101:1994;414-445.
2. Burt P., Julesz B. A disparity gradient limit for binocular vision. Science. 208:1980;615-617.
3. Burt P., Julesz B. Modifications of the classical notion of Panum's fusional area. Perception. 9:1980;671-682.
4. Collet, T.S. (1985). Extrapolating and interpolating surfaces in depth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 224, 43-56.
5. Foley J.M., Richards W. Effects of voluntary eye movement and convergence on the binocular appreciation of depth. Perception and Psychophysics. 11:1972;423-427.
6. Frisby J.P., Mayhew J.E. The relationship between apparent depth and disparity in rivalrous-texture stereograms. Perception. 78:1978;661-678.
7. Gillam B., Borsting E. The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays. Perception. 19:1988;603-608.
8. Gogel W.C. The tendency to see objects as equidistant and its inverse relation to lateral separation. Psychological Monographs. 70:1956;1-17.
9. Harris J.P., Gregory R.L. Fusion and rivalry of illusory contours. Perception. 2:1973;235-247.
10. Julesz B. Binocular depth perception without familiarity cues. Science. 145:1964;356-362.
11. Lodge H., Wist E.R. The growth of equidistance tendency over time. Perception and Psychophysics. 3:1968;97-103.
12. Mitchison G.J., McKee S.P. The resolution of ambiguous stereoscopic matches by interpolation. Vision Research. 27:1987;285-294.
13. Mustillo P. Binocular mechanisms mediating crossed and uncrossed stereopsis. Psychological Bulletin. 97:1985;187-201.
14. Nakayama K., Shimojo S. Da Vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Research. 11:1990;1811-1825.
15. Nakayama K., Shimojo S. Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science. 257:1992;1357-1363.
16. Ramachandran V.S., Cavanagh P. Subjective contours capture stereopsis. Nature. 317:1985;527-530.
17. Richards W. Stereopsis and stereoblindness. Experimental Brain Research. 10:1970;380-388.
18. Richards W. Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 61:1971;410-414.
19. Shimojo S., Nakayama K. Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry. Vision Research. 30:1990;69-80.
20. Takeichi H., Watanabe T., Shimojo S. Illusory occluding contours and surface formation by depth propagation. Perception. 21:1992;177-184.